What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 03, 2015 (14:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful !! amazing the momentowow! Bella!! stupendo il momento |
| sent on July 03, 2015 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Stefano really beautiful! :-P
Hello and congratulations,
Paul ;-) Davvero bella Stefano! 
Ciao e complimenti,
Paolo  |
| sent on July 03, 2015 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, Jordan!
Hello, Paul!
Thank you both!
Hello! Ciao, Giordano!
Ciao, Paolo!
Grazie ad entrambi!
Ciao! |
| sent on September 14, 2015 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful! Bella! |
| sent on September 15, 2015 (6:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! Grazie! |
| sent on November 24, 2015 (6:50)
very nice!, bravo |
| sent on November 25, 2015 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you!
Hello. Grazie!
Ciao. |
| sent on April 26, 2017 (7:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, Marcello.
Here I am, sorry.
My was born to film but it's autofocus (a bit slow), if closed to f8 on subjects within the 10 meters is sharp mum, but if it falls the light and you must open or lengthen the time between sharpness and shake-you lose a lot .
I have no experience on f8 lenses you mention, but I've never heard good, it might be interesting to the 300 f 5.6
My 200-400 him I paid € 150 but again it cost 800,000 pounds (almost a salary of those years).
Hoping to be helpful, I salute you. Ciao, Marcello.
Eccomi, scusa.
Il mio è nato per pellicola ma è comunque autofocus (un po lento), se chiuso a f8 su soggetti entro i 10 metri è nitidssimo, ma se cala la luce e devi aprire o allungare i tempi, fra nitidezza e micromosso si perde parecchio.
Non ho esperienza sulle lenti f8 che citi, però non ne ho mai sentito parlare bene, potrebbe essere interessante il 300 f 5.6
Il mio 200-400 lo ho pagato 150 € ma da nuovo costava 800000 lire (quasi uno stipendio di quegli anni).
Sperando di essere stato utile, ti saluto. |
| sent on November 02, 2019 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great catch, good time!!!! Ottima cattura, bel momento!!!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
...ed altri (ma a che distanza eri dai soggetti in quegli scatti nitidissimi ?! ) mentre ho notato una forte perdita di nitidezza in molte altre fatte...presumo..da piu' lontano 
e non mi ha colpito particolarmente quella alla Luna 
Marcello 