What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 05, 2014 (20:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gorgeous shot, detail from fear
hello
Danilo Splendido scatto,dettaglio da paura
ciao
Danilo |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful pictures :) just a question. Why 1/16000 and ISO 2000 and 1/8000 and 1000 iso or even better 1/4000 and ISO 500?
From my ignorance I believe that 1/4000 is enough to freeze even moving subjects. This then is also static.
Why that choice? Bellissima foto :) solo una domanda. Perchè 1/16000 e 2000 iso e non 1/8000 e 1000 iso o ancora meglio 1/4000 e 500 iso?
Dalla mia ignoranza credo che 1/4000 basti per congelare anche soggetti in movimento. Questo poi è pure statico.
Come mai quella scelta? |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really good, congratulations! Davvero ottima, complimenti! |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Matteo2191:
“ Why 1/16000 and ISO 2000 and 1/8000 and 1000 iso or even better 1/4000 and ISO 500?
From my ignorance I believe that 1/4000 is enough to freeze even moving subjects. This then is also static.
Why that choice? „
Why 1/16000 is a mistake and thanks for letting me know .... :-)
The Mark IV does not even at the time, comes to a maximum 8000sec., In the data there is a ZERO more ;-)
I also work in Manual with Auto ISO, I choose the time and the aperture, the camera sets the ISO them ...
As to the static nature of the subject and the time taken, you'll be in disagreement but the times that imposed, are designed to not have mecromosso (used for focal ...) and maybe find me ready for a possible shot, or dive out of the subject ;-)
Now I correct in the sixteen thousand six hundred ... :-D
Hello and thanks to you and the friends who left their mark ..!
@ Marco50:
“ subject 10
10 colors
Post Production 11 „
...... caxxo that report card ..!! Then you are promoted ...!! :-D
“ 9.99999 (because there are those who say that there is the out of focus) mahhhh! „
I'm sorry but have lost 0.00001 points for this "flaw" wow! :-D:-D
Thanks Marco and make good
Roby @Matteo2191:
" Perchè 1/16000 e 2000 iso e non 1/8000 e 1000 iso o ancora meglio 1/4000 e 500 iso?
Dalla mia ignoranza credo che 1/4000 basti per congelare anche soggetti in movimento. Questo poi è pure statico.
Come mai quella scelta?"
Perchè 1/16000 è un errore e grazie per avermelo fatto notare.... 
La Mark IV non arriva nemmeno a quel tempo, massimo arriva a un 8000sec., nei dati c'è uno ZERO di più 
Inoltre lavoro in Manuale con gli Iso Auto, mi scelgo il tempo e il diaframma, gli Iso li imposta la fotocamera...
In quanto alla staticità del soggetto e al tempo scelto, potrai essere in disaccordo ma i tempi che imposto, sono studiati per non avere micromosso (per le focali utilizzate...) e magari trovarmi pronto ad un eventuale scatto, partenza o tuffo del soggetto
Ora correggo il sedicimila in milleseicento... 
Ciao e grazie a te e agli amici che hanno lasciato un segno del loro passaggio..!!!
@Marco50:
" soggetto 10
cromie 10
Post Produzione 11"
...... caxxo che pagella..!!!! Allora sono promosso...!!!!
" 9,99999 (perché c'è chi dice che esiste il fuori fuoco) mahhhh!!!"
Mi dispiace però avere perso 0,00001 punti per questa "pecca" 
Grazie Marco e a buon rendere
Roby |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A here. 1/1600 has already been a more appropriate time ;-) I was not disagreeing with your time but with that 1/16000, in particular, that it seemed a bit strange. ;-) A ecco. 1/1600 è già un tempo più consono Non mi trovavo in disaccordo con i tuoi tempi ma con quel 1/16000 in particolare che mi sembrava un po strano. |
| sent on February 07, 2014 (20:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I join the chorus!
Top all ... Mi unisco al coro !
Top in tutto ... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
