RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Di tutto in pò 2

View gallery (21 photos)

sent on October 21, 2012 (15:24) by Dominorosso. 93 comments, 11401 views.

, 6 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, hand held.


View High Resolution 3.9 MP  



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (15:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

one last thing .... a photo bad for you photographers can be good for the common people ... that does not look to force the technical aspects, but simply something that the photo had informed him at that moment a ... jury "photographers" shoot still photos to zero in on technically bad ... I know it well ... but this picture is attracting attention because "his way" something's got to say ... you can continue to arrovellarvi with disquisitions specialist accanirvi only ... to this photo because it is bad (only this one) but can not figure out who the photo should reach the public ... and not to the jury ... I do not do any competition.
Picasso was considered a goat among the artists of the time ... but then people loved it .... and it is a value that must like ... juries are always too critical ....
now this shot isbecome the scapegoat for all the horrible pictures that circulate in the forum ...
It served to something .... but please ... before you criticize without mercy .... look at all the pictures .... and watch your ... I only see spiders, insects, fungi, windows and portraits really sad .... and how life teaches .. the most ruthless were the ones who have nothing to say!
close
The Fo T or stoned ù br ut ta around the forums!! ok!!

user1166
avatar
sent on October 25, 2012 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Dominorosso, forgive me, but is not that the aesthetic sense is property of the photographers and the "common people" it is free! A photo ugly is ugly no matter ;-)
See, the development of taste and beauty requires, like many other things, a learning process, and if someone is looking something bad is probably because his aesthetic sense was not brought up.
I - who in all honesty, I feel more "ordinary people" who photographs - I do not see what the "something" that should say this photo in its own way or his way. Maybe we can tell you.
Personally, I find ugly in the same way that many other photos are bad, but this is not an issue. It will not be the worst ever, but produces little aesthetic impression gradevole.
I believe that each of us has taken pictures ugly. The important thing is to recognize and cestinarle (or keep them for themselves). If you post on a forum of photography come to wider audience. Public, not the jury. In the opinion of this audience I think is quite unique.

As for Picasso, I think that only the lack of knowledge allows to say that he was "considered a goat among the artists of the" wow! Picasso was a painter of the twentieth century by far the most celebrated in his own lifetime. With Matisse, for example, had an ongoing exchange of ideas and experiences, and is not that Matisse was just the latest addition to ... ;-)
Not to mention that Picasso could paint to draw perfectly in the traditional way. ;-)
As for the "common people", well, & egravand, that Picasso is at the top and "like very much" ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dominorosso, for your information, every time I have half an hour that I can stay on this forum (since they attend as well), I always try to comment on other photographs, writing advice, criticism and even compliments, where I think they are deserved.
So please, do not be beaten dog: it is very unlikely that any photograph posted on the forum is annotated by multiple users, so do not use this as an excuse to say that we are avid about you.
Surely, if I had not responded that way to constructive criticism, there would be so many comments and requests, and probably would have actually learned something new.

Finally, disturb [the] artists that will surely violently turn they will be in the coffin, it seems wrong and selfish.

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not to mention that Picasso could paint to draw perfectly in the traditional way.


In fact, only those who master the technique can experiment with real mastery.

Learn how to photograph the second very precise rules means learning to keep two cages close but separate, a lion and a tiger. When you experience the cages open, and you must continue to ensure that the two remain separate beasts. I hope makes the idea.

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

but this is a forum for philosophers ;-) since it is as bad as other photos are ugly .... please stop commenting ... and please ... go on to the THREE pictures .... and let's stop the professors just that ... we do not need to learn ... I need ... but I certainly do not think any of you to pretend that you know a person by one click ... ugly ugly it is and not looking at the other pictures he took ...
please .... avoid making judgments ... and learn to be more humble ...
are days when I say that the photo is bad but it is no longer the center of the discourse .... you who absolutely needs to prove to force your knowledge ... but no one at this point I asked her ... thanks ... I'm not afraid of losing people in the forum who just need to emerge 17.0000 ... we then take a trip somewhere else ... and now I will be evenand arrogant, but frankly you can not lose time to quibble botched snap ...

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (18:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not think any of you to pretend that you know a person by one click


Dominorosso, I understand that you feel the picture, but no one has it in for you. It is not that if someone tells you that the photo is shit, sucks, do you mean that you're an asshole. You were placed comments on the photo, not on your person. This is not the first time that I point out. People judge your photo, and not you. And if that bothers you all continue to comment, just remove that and everything will disappear by magic ;)


avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Photoshop retouching ... processing ... etc etc. .... Look, when there were no digital darkroom mica went there to ambush the photographers ... some of the greatest "effects" of today ... that allow you to recreate Photoshop or other insights are the result of (or sometimes errors) of photographers during shooting or development ....
Then how everything ... the use of post production must have a meaning and weight ....
Greetings

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello Dominirosso,
Sharpness first.
but 'the girl' cute!
and do not take it, go ahead, but 'trying to improve.

hello
paolo

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

but it does not bother me absolutely nothing .... but if you go on the forum and saw this picture and said "that process photos!" because then I want to force to give advice ... from a process nn pictures you can bring out anything ... do not ... do not understand why all puònmigliorare to say "maf pdc ... hdr pp .. etc. .. . "
when the page .... get naked in a vision ina 15 photos ... eccoo anvedi this ... that bad .... and this one ... ugly ... this other insignificant .... and this oddiiiioooooooooo with colorful cushions,,,,,,, is as bad as the other also more but I want to say to the one who took it that is bad and that he could focus his eyes ..... only this though!!
and then began to make flights of fancy ... philosophizing put tigers and lions ... close beaten dogs ....
Again, the picture remainsand you are free to say what you want ... God forbid ... if you want! Because ... wasting time to comment on my not seeing other nasties as to rise from the ashes ... I suggest if you want me ... and some of them on your galleries ...
Come on ... avoid saying banality!





avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (20:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think I understand, your was a publicity stunt.
You were a great, in a short time you were able to get half of the contacts that I have had in 6 months.
Otherwise can not be explained
Brilliant:-D:-D:-D

avatarjunior
sent on October 25, 2012 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-D:-D:-D come on! and Ridiamoci on ... if there is someone to target is in the midst of political surely ....
by I admit it ... The photo is KA KAR EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

user15009
avatar
sent on October 26, 2012 (0:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

IDOL ... THAT! This discussion is making me have fun too ... However, you are right to say that the site there are all right photos "isignificanti" (probably including mine) but we try to keep the high level forum. In other words, if someone writes a negative comment maybe there is a reason and if they are in many ... Probabilemte're getting all this attention simply because people want to have fun, a bit 'like walking around with a cow on the roof of the car, vol not say that you are to be admired but all you would look ...

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2012 (1:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... philosophizing put tigers and lions ... close beaten dogs ....


It was an example that I did understand the meaning of experience, to go outside the rules ... but perhaps I was wrong to riproportelo, it happens to all of overestimating.

Oh well, I'm not going to edit, but I change my response:

's photo sucks. So you feel say what you want and you are happy as well. :-D

a little 'how to get around with a cow on the roof of the car, vol not say that you are to be admired but all you would look ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2012 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dominorosso after all sti comments I still have not figured out if you're there or are you doing ...

In the second case you are an absolute legend: were you able to get 54 comments and over 3000 visits with a picture that is objectively shit! :-D

PS: I entered because intrigued by the number of messages and views, not in the photo ...

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2012 (9:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dominorosso screwed us all, with his way of responding in the forum kept us minutes and minutes to read and comment! :-P
Give me back my half an hour of life! :-D

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2012 (9:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thank you thank you and thank you ... really constructive comment:-D

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2012 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Although it is completely in accord with the post (even the critics) above, I just want to point out two flaws in my opinion very clear.
- The selection of the hair, especially at the top right, it is done in a very coarse.
- For the B / W would not have used the desaturation (darkens the skin), but a filtered red that would give a clearer and more harmonious result.

I'll leave you making you notice that, posting in a forum, photographers, critics are ruthless, but constructive.
I have a friend who publishes the photos only where he receives compliments, useful for self-esteem ... but not to improve.

PS
I answer for me and I will be completely honest ... I opened the photo because I like boobs girl:-D

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2012 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

yes, you too, good morafoto girl's boobs:-P

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2012 (19:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I add to visits and comments to confirm that the popularity of one unit does not depend in any way on its quality: I have opened a photo quite intrigued by how insignificant it may attract a lot of attention. And I found what I pensvo or controversy. But I do not think it's the fault of those who criticize the photo (because if one just wants compliments will then mail a little life ...). And on this I can only say "MAH". the words "not as important as it is spoken, it is important that we speak" is Goebbels, taken recently by Berlusconi ... decide if you really want to make it your own ... : D Good night and good light at all!

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2012 (19:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

(I add only that the shots are more interesting to children. Least in my opinion)




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me