What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 31, 2017 (2:15) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
| sent on March 08, 2018 (23:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Always make very beautiful photos, I'm honest, you're very good.
I ask you, if possible, to learn, why here you kept the diaphragm so closed, you did not need so much depth of field .. which forced you to shoot at 1/4, with some risk of blur (which in reality there is not). Fai sempre foto molto belle, sono sincero, sei bravissimo.
Ti chiedo, se possibile, per imparare, come mai qui hai tenuto il diaframma così chiuso, non avevi bisogno di tanta profondità di campo.. cosa che ti ha obbligato a scattare a 1/4, con qualche rischio di mosso (che in realtà non c'è). |
| sent on March 08, 2018 (23:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks ... I obviously tried the blur and I entered 1/4 with VC 15 mm allows me to stand still, then I entered 100 ISO x the maximum quality / range, the result x correct exposure was f18 ... f18 was not a choice but a consequence of the first two variables ... after all if I kept 1/4 f5.6 for example, I would have to set 10 iso .. but there is 10 iso? maybe but unfortunately not! I hope I was clear ;-) thanks xi congratulations Grazie... Ho cercato ovviamente il mosso ed ho inserito 1/4 che con VC a 15 mm mi permette di stare ancora fermo, poi ho inserito 100 iso x il massimo della qualità / gamma, il risultato x una corretta esposizione é stato f18... f18 non è stata una scelta ma una conseguenza delle prime due variabili... del resto se mantenevo 1/4 f5.6 ad esempio, avrei dovuto impostare 10 iso.. ma esiste 10 iso? magari ma purtroppo no! spero di essere stato chiaro ;-) grazie ancora x i complimenti |
| sent on March 09, 2018 (1:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you for the explanation.
It's a bit like if you had worked on time priorities, but managed completely by yourself.
Thanks again. Grazie a te per la spiegazione.
E' un pò come se avessi lavorato in priorità di tempi, ma gestita da te completamente.
Grazie ancora. |
| sent on March 09, 2018 (9:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You can see it like that too ... I prioritize times have never used it ... :-) La puoi vedere anche così... io priorità di tempi non l'ho mai usata... :-) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
