Castelvecchio Bridge, page 3

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape with human elements

Resize to fit window

Città d`arte View gallery (6 photos)

Castelvecchio Bridge sent on May 22, 2015 (10:50) by Ivan Gugole. 51 comments, 3156 views.

, 20 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod. Verona, Italy.

108 persons like it: Ahalm, Albe85, Alberto Sobrero, Albertopantellini, Albieri Sergio, Alepou, Alessandro Maggiore, Alessandro Traverso, Alessio Del Frate, Alessio Orlando, Alifax, Allmau, Alma Rey, Antoniomaggiore, Arvina, Astro68, Balotts, Bart La Gioia, Bljum, Ciotto, Cirillo Donelli, Claudio Cozzani, Cris1976, Dantes, Eddie85, Emiliano De Franceschi, Erpuglia, Fabrizio Ferri, Federico Bergamaschi, Fiorenzo Fiorenza, Flaber70, Florin, Fotoacrobata, Francesco Iafelice, Francescodeflorio, Fw190d, Gabriele Castellari, Geronimuss, Giagi17, GiamrIO, Gianni Aggravi, Ginno, Giovabubi, Giovanni Riccardi, Giovannini Italo, GiulianoStev, Guelfo, Guido Bianchimano, Jankoj, Jonathan68, Kermit58, Kernerit, Kikkiricky, Klikand, Luca Letta, Luca Monego, Luca Sberveglieri, Luca160, Lucapucci, LucianoSerra.d, Luigi Martano, Luigi Mossali, Lured60, Mallamaci Giovanni, Mamaroby, Manue'83, Marco Neri, Marco50, Marcof86, Massibi, Massimiliano Bianchini, Massimo Milioli, Mauro X, Maxt, Mazzerix, Melisseo67, Minotaurus, Movani, Mr Eko, Nicola Adami, Nonnachecca, Peter Pipistrello, Pier Luigi Ferrari, Pijei, Pm544, Raducan Gabriel, Rgb78, Riccardo Arena Trazzi, Riccardo Frontoni, Riccardoerre, Ricciulino, Ronda, Rosamaria Bidoli, Rubino232, Salvo L. G., Sballone, Scava 73, Sg67, Silvano Bossi, Siragusa.v, Stefano Tarabelli, Sukirno Maskur, Tiroby, Turibol, Uomoragno, Valentina72, Victor1982, Yuli74

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Ivan Gugole

sent on February 22, 2016 (10:07)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie Yari78 del passaggio.
Per la nitidezza "perdo" un pochino di tempo nelle impostazioni in fase di scatto, in pp di solito non ci passo molto tempo (non per la nitidezza almeno).
Un saluto, Ivan

Thanks Yari78 passage.
For clarity "lose" a little bit of time in the settings during shooting, pp usually does not take long step time (at least not for the sharpness).
Greetings, Ivan

Yari78

sent on February 22, 2016 (10:44)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ivan troppo nitida per non averci lavorato un po in PP.. soprattutto col 17-40 ;-)

Comunque ciò non toglie che il risultato finale è spettacolare! Sorriso

Ivan too sharp for not having worked a little PP .. especially with 17-40 ;-)
However the fact remains that the end result is spectacular! :-)

Ivan Gugole

sent on February 22, 2016 (14:56)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Beh, un pó è ovvio che la lavoro per quanto riguarda la nitidezza, si tratta in genere di modifiche ai selettori di chiarezza (che mi piace veramente molto per il risultato che rende) e nitidezza (che modifico pochissimo perché ha un effetto che mi piace molto poco), ma in tutto (per la nitidezza) ci passo solo qualche secondo in pp Sorriso

Dal tuo commento mi sembra di capire, ma forse mi sbaglio, che non sei proprio soddisfatto del 17-40.
Posso dirti che del mio sono veramente contento e reputo abbia una buonissima nitidezza, sono arrivato anche fino a f/16 ma di più per ora non oso, di certo non lo cambierei per il 16-35, a meno che qualche buona anima non me lo regalasse MrGreen

Grazie ancora del passaggio, ciao ciao ;-)

Ivan

Well, a little bit it is obvious that the work regarding the sharpness, it is usually to clear selectors changes (which I like very much to the result that makes) and sharpness (which I edit very little because it has an effect that I like very little), but in all (for sharpness) step there only a few seconds pp :-)
From your comments I understand, but maybe I'm wrong, that you're just not happy with the 17-40.
I can tell you that my'm really happy and I think has a very good sharpness, I even came up to f / 16, but more so for now I dare not, certainly I would not change it for the 16-35, unless some good soul I do not regalasse :-D
Thanks again pass, hello hello ;-)
Ivan

Yari78

sent on February 22, 2016 (21:30)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie per la delucidazione Ivan, devo dire che il 17-40 mi soddisfa ma non sui bordi, anche diaframmato tra f8 e f11 (miglior resa poi va in difrazione). Comunque amo i grandangolari e amo la loro deformazione prospettica che difatti correggo poco e niente MrGreen

ma se un giorno potrò, passerò al 16-35 IS che è su un altro livello ;-)

Thanks for the clarification Ivan, I have to say that the 17-40 satisfies me but not on the edges, even diaphragmed between f8 and f11 (better yield then goes into diffraction). Anyway I love the wide-angle and I love their perspective deformation which in fact I correct little or nothing :-D but if one day I can, I will pass to the 16-35 IS that's on another level ;-)

Mallamaci Giovanni

sent on June 23, 2016 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great nice shot and good accomplishment! Complimenti.Ciao :-)

Claudio Cozzani

sent on June 23, 2016 (23:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The Scaligero bridge, good night, good management of lights and great pdr, congratulations, 8-)

claudio c

Antoniomaggiore

sent on June 24, 2016 (14:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful shot and excellent post production.
Compliments.
AM

Ivan Gugole

sent on June 26, 2016 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Claudio and Antonio comments.
Greetings, Ivan ;-)

Marco Neri

sent on September 29, 2018 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations Ivan-you have a feeling for the long exposures and the incredible night. Great. :-P
at the cost of appearing trivial: all beautiful photos of your galleries...
Good we :-P
Mark

user81750

sent on December 06, 2018 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A night's splendor!
Ale

Giagi17

sent on April 15, 2023 (17:07) | This comment has been translated

Very nice!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.