What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
fantastic fantastica |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful stupenda |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great show, you are blessed that you have lived .... grande spettacolo, beati voi che l'avete vissuto.... |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Entertainment in High Definition! but you have to say! :-D Spettacolo in alta definizione! ma che ti devo dire! |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Show!! I envy! managed benissimo.Complimenti wonderful situation.
hello. Spettacolo!!!! che invidia!!! splendida situazione gestita benissimo.Complimenti.
ciao. |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mom what colors! Spectacular. Excellent composition and also the bridge is illuminated an interesting subject. STe Mamma che colori!!! Spettacolare. Ottima composizione e anche il ponte illuminato è un soggetto interessante. STe |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular! Spettacolare!!! |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful.
Compliments. :-) Bellissima.
Complimenti.  |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
this is one of the things that you should see at least once in their lifetime.
compliments is just beautiful.
but added three shots had the same exposure? did not know this technique and the benefit it brings. questa è una delle cose che si dovrebbe ammirare almeno una volta nella vita.
complimenti è proprio bella.
ma i tre scatti sommati avevano la stessa esposizione?non conosco questa tecnica e il vantaggio che porta. |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really fantastic! Fantastica veramente! |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
what to say ...... to admire in silence convinced them to be.!
FDS? :-D che dire......da ammirare in silenzio convinti di essere li.!
F.D.S.? |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great show!
Beautiful!
Hello
Raffaele
Grande spettacolo!!!
Bellissima!!!
Ciao
Raffaele
|
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... no comment, and when the handle '... the handle! ... no comment, quando il manico e' ... il manico !! |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
oh Juza six inhuman oddio Juza sei disumano  |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations master. I 'happened to see pictures of dawn with different colors. The tone expressed by the vision and 'so throughout the year or varies according to the seasons or locations? A greeting. Complimenti maestro . Mi e' capitato di vedere foto dell'aurora con differenti colorazioni . La tonalità espressa dalla visione e' così tutto l'anno o varia in base alle stagioni o alle posizioni ? Un saluto . |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Four :-) Three exposures for the sky (2.5 "f/1.8 ISO 800) + exposure for the foreground (30" f/4.5 ISO 400) ... being processed four shows were "added" to accomplish this. If I had used a single long exposure times, the whole sky would look greenish - the aurora is moving very fast! „
Wait a minute, let me get this! It is clear to me the sum the sky on the first floor, but what you do with the SAME THREE exposures of the sky (all three with 2.5 ", 1.8 ISO800) ? If you were the same as exposure ... how (and why ') have the together? " Quattro :-) Tre esposizioni per il cielo (2.5" f/1.8 ISO 800) + un'esposizione per il primo piano (30" f/4.5 ISO 400)... in fase di elaborazione le quattro esposizioni sono state "sommate" per ottenere questo risultato. Se avessi usato una singola esposizione molto lunga, tutto il cielo sarebbe apparso verdastro - l'aurora si muove molto velocemente! "
Un attimo, fammi capire! Mi e'chiaro il sommare il cielo al primo piano, ma cosa hai fatto delle TRE esposizioni UGUALI del cielo (tutte e tre a 2.5", 1.8 ISO800)? Se erano uguali come esposizione... come (e perche') le hai unite? |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful ... stupenda... |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you again!
Shooting at f/4.5 is only used to get the foreground (the bridges) clearer (Sigma 20mm f/1.8 is the ugly :-))
The three shots f/1.8 allowed to block the movement of the dawn ... I'll explain: this picture shows a time span of 7.5 "(for the sky). During this time the aurora moved very quickly, moving in different portions of the sky, but if I had done in one take very long, appeared to "spread" over the entire surface. With three shots instead I captured so clearly separate the different positions and then I joined using the layer mask. Practically, this photo shows the car radio in different positions in about 7 seconds, but united in a single shot that shows them all at once. I hope I explained myself :-)
It 'a technique that is most often used in sports and action photos of an example: content.snapixel.com/serve-content/EBS0/ M_ibwphotography_c29ae7142/Photo-of-Mountain-Bike-Rider-360-BMX-Jump-Stunt.jpg (this bike is not mine, is the first example I found with google) Grazie ancora!
Lo scatto a f/4.5 serve unicamente ad avere il primo piano (i ponti) più nitido (a f/1.8 il Sigma 20mm è orrendo :-))
I tre scatti a f/1.8 hanno permesso di bloccare il movimento dell'aurora...mi spiego meglio: questa foto mostra un arco di tempo di 7.5" (per quanto riguarda il cielo). Durante questo tempo l'aurora si è mossa molto velocemente, spostandosi in diverse porzioni di cielo: se però avessi fatto un solo scatto molto lungo, sarebbe apparsa "spalmata" su tutta la superficie. Con tre scatti invece ho catturato in modo chiaramente separato le diverse posizioni e poi le ho unite usando la layer mask. In pratica questa foto mostra l'autora in diverse posizioni assunte nell'arco di circa 7 secondi, unite però in un singolo scatto che le mostra tutte contemporaneamente. Spero di essermi spiegato bene :-)
E' una tecnica che viene usata più spesso in foto di sport e azione, un esempio: content.snapixel.com/serve-content/EBS0/m_ibwphotography_c29ae7142/Pho (questa della bici non è mia, è il primo esempio che ho trovato con google) |
| sent on January 13, 2012 (17:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
meravigiliosa ...! wonderful ..! ... meravigiliosa...!stupenda..!... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
