What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 29, 2014 (7:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh yes ..... purtroppo.I Fuji colors are meglio.Lo try with xt-1, however, will be a 420mm ...... Eh si.....purtroppo.I colori Fuji sono meglio.Lo proverò con la xt-1, però sarà un 420mm...... |
| sent on November 29, 2014 (7:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Is said to be the top in terms of sharpness ..... at mondiale.Sicuramente the best that Leica has managed fare.Si talk of more than 450 l / mm.
The contrast is outstanding and is the only goal that gives the maximum TA.Già to 5.6 begins to peggiorare.Ne have built 2,000 pieces.
Mine is 1996. Si dice che sia il top in quanto a nitidezza.....a livello mondiale.Sicuramente il meglio che Leica abbia saputo fare.Si parla di oltre 450 l/mm.
Il contrasto è eccezionale ed è l'unico obiettivo che dà il massimo a TA.Già a 5.6 comincia a peggiorare.Ne hanno costruiti 2000 pezzi.
Il mio è del 1996. |
user46920 | sent on November 29, 2014 (8:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thought you had already had, or maybe I get confused with the 2.8 ...
You did well to take it, is "deadly" !!! Pensavo che l'avevi già avuto, o forse mi confondo col 2.8 ...
Hai fatto bene a prenderlo, è "micidiale" !!! |
| sent on November 29, 2014 (8:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had the 2.8. From 1985 to 2013.Poi I sold it, unfortunately, for trouble focusing with 5Dmk3.
With 6D I was well again and I decided to take the 4.0.
Unfortunately does a bang and is one of the few cases where the costs considerably less bright than most .....
The quality is there, no doubt.
This means that you can use it wide open with no problems. Ho avuto il 2,8. Dal 1985 al 2013.Poi lo vendetti ,malauguratamente, per problemi di messa a fuoco con la 5Dmk3.
Con la 6D mi sono trovato di nuovo bene ed ho deciso di prendere il 4,0.
Purtoppo costa un botto ed è uno dei pochi casi dove il meno luminoso costa notevolmente di più.....
La qualità c'è ,indubbiamente.
Questo sì che puoi usarlo a tutta apertura senza problemi. |
user46920 | sent on November 29, 2014 (9:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe it is also good to take the view:-P wide open, so for something different;-) Magari è anche ottima per scattare dei Panorami  a tutta apertura, così per qualcosa di diverso  |
user2290 | sent on November 29, 2014 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great pics
I seem to touch for so are three-dimensional and real
Foto stupende
Mi sembra di toccare con mano da tanto sono tridimensionali e reali
|
| sent on November 29, 2014 (13:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mario !!!
Hello
Julian Grazie Mario!!!
Ciao
Giuliano |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
