What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 21, 2014 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful panoramic, congratulations! Also excellent light moment where you took;-)
Hello, Ilaria Bellissima panoramica, complimenti! Ottimo anche il momento di luce in cui hai scattato
Ciao, Ilaria |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (1:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful. Congratulations! It will also be a classic, but always fascinating! Bravissimo!
Just one question! Why have you joined three shots identical? If they were different exposures understand each other, but because the same no ...
Congratulations again ...
See you soon:-P Bellissima. Complimenti! Sarà pure un classico, ma sempre affascinante! Bravissimo!
Solo una domanda! Perché hai unito tre scatti identici? Se fossero con esposizioni diverse capirsi, ma il perche identici no...
Complimenti di nuovo...
A presto  |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile, thanks to everyone.
Identical in the sense that they have the same exposure data. So as not to have problems mounting.
Hello Intanto grazie a tutti.
Identici nel senso che hanno gli stessi dati di esposizione. Così da non aver problemi di montaggio.
Ciao |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (9:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, I understand that they are identical. I do not understand why make three identical to unite them instead of one single shot and that's it. The result would not have been the same? Si, ho capito che sono identici. Non capisco il perche farne tre identici per unirli anziché uno scatto singolo e basta. Il risultato non sarebbe stato identico? |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (9:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hours fantastic blue .... And great view ... Fantastica blue Hours.... E ottimo panorama... |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (10:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very beautiful, spectacular sky. Giuliano:-P molto bella, cielo spettacolare. Giuliano |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But I'm three shots together into a panoramic. They are made in vertical order not to lose detail and to make a correct fitting without distortion. Ma sono tre scatti uniti in panoramica. Sono fatti in verticale per non perdere dettaglio e per fare un montaggio corretto senza distorsione. |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (15:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Aaaahhhh, now I understand ... I understand by way of triple exposure, that's why I did not understand ... I'm a little melted probably:-D Aaaahhhh, adesso ho capito... Avevo capito a mo di tripla esposizione, ecco perché non capivo... Sono un po fuso probabilmente |
| sent on August 22, 2014 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would not have said !!
Io non lo ho detto!!
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
