Cabbage, page 2 | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

16.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Foto macro 2025 View gallery (17 photos)

Cabbage sent on October 07, 2025 (21:29) by Gandy. 23 comments, 239 views.

, 1/5 f/13.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Un poca di visibilità anche alla cenerentola delle farfalle. Lo scatto è singolo, originale il posatoio e anche lo sfondo. Luce naturale. Vi saluto Tutti, gandy

View High Resolution 16.7 MP

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Gandy

sent on October 13, 2025 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Dmo
Davide- for me the 100 mm focal length to my taste is short, 150 mm is better. For very small subjects, such as lycaenids, I am sometimes forced to remove the lens hood because it shadows them. For the manual maf I find no differences; Sharp they are both in the same way, perhaps a little better the 100 mm at the extreme edges. I took the 100 mm because autofocus in view of focus stacking that I have not yet deepened.
Pawel
Nicola- You're right, I hadn't noticed it; there's even a speck of dust that escaped me :-D.
Daniele
Lucio- it's a matter of taste :-) My area is quite flat and backgrounds are often a problem.
I greet you and thank you all

Davcam

sent on October 13, 2025 (22:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Gandino, thank you very much for the useful information and considerations.
I'll wait a little longer to get more feedback about the new Sony 100mm macro and then I'll decide whether to opt for the expensive Sony or Irix. The cost differences are certainly not trivial, but that lens and its possible use intrigue me.
A cordial greeting,
Davide

XFleshcoated

sent on October 14, 2025 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Always fabulous work!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.