What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 13, 2025 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Dmo Davide- for me the 100 mm focal length to my taste is short, 150 mm is better. For very small subjects, such as lycaenids, I am sometimes forced to remove the lens hood because it shadows them. For the manual maf I find no differences; Sharp they are both in the same way, perhaps a little better the 100 mm at the extreme edges. I took the 100 mm because autofocus in view of focus stacking that I have not yet deepened. Pawel Nicola- You're right, I hadn't noticed it; there's even a speck of dust that escaped me :-D. Daniele Lucio- it's a matter of taste :-) My area is quite flat and backgrounds are often a problem. I greet you and thank you all @ Dmo Davide- per me la focale 100 mm a mio gusto è corta, 150 mm è meglio. Per soggetti molto piccoli, tipo licenidi talvolta sono costretto a togliere il paraluce perché gli fa ombra. Per la maf manuale non ci trovo differenze; taglienti lo sono entrambi alla stessa maniera, forse un filino meglio il 100 mm ai bordi estremi. Il 100 mm l'ho preso perché autofocus in vista di focus stacking che non ho ancora approfondito. Pawel Nicola- hai ragione, non lo avevo notato; c'è pure un puntino di polvere che m'è sfuggito. l'età che avanza Daniele Lucio- é questione di gusti la mia zona è parecchio piatta e gli sfondi sono spesso un problema. Vi saluto e vi ringrazio Tutti |
| sent on October 13, 2025 (22:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Gandino, thank you very much for the useful information and considerations. I'll wait a little longer to get more feedback about the new Sony 100mm macro and then I'll decide whether to opt for the expensive Sony or Irix. The cost differences are certainly not trivial, but that lens and its possible use intrigue me. A cordial greeting, Davide Ciao Gandino, grazie mille per le utili informazioni e considerazioni. Attenderò ancora un po' per avere maggiori riscontri riguardo al nuovo macro Sony 100 mm e poi deciderò se optare per il costoso Sony o per Irix. Le differenze di costo certo non sono banali, ma quell'obiettivo e il suo possibile utilizzo mi incuriosiscono. Un cordiale saluto, Davide |
| sent on October 14, 2025 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Always fabulous work! Sempre lavori favolosi! |
| sent on October 16, 2025 (17:13) | This comment has been translated
Amazing! |
| sent on October 17, 2025 (0:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a delicacy. Che delicatezza. |
| sent on October 17, 2025 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition and colors, congratulations. Composizione e colori bellissimi, complimenti. |
| sent on October 17, 2025 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
She may be a Cinderella, but she looks royal. Very elegant and delicate image like embroidery. :-P stunning! Greetings. Susy Sarà anche una cenerentola, ma ha un aspetto regale. Immagine elegantissima e delicata come un ricamo. Splendida! Un saluto. Susy |
| sent on November 01, 2025 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a show, fantastic shot, always very good! Hi, Mary Che spettacolo, scatto fantastico, sempre bravissimo! Ciao, Mary |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |