What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 31, 2025 (16:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alcenero, Claudio and Massimo, thanks a lot 
cheers
Antonello Alcenero, Claudio e Massimo, vi ringrazio tanto
Ciao
Antonello |
| sent on July 31, 2025 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great macro!
Happy WE!
Oleg. Ottima macro!
Buon WE!
Oleg. |
| sent on August 01, 2025 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A very nice and successful shot, congratulations Antonello!!
hello
Fabio Uno scatto molto simpatico e ben riuscito, complimenti Antonello!!
ciao
Fabio |
| sent on August 01, 2025 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oleg and Fabio, thank you so much 
cheers
Antonello Oleg e Fabio, grazie mille
Ciao
Antonello |
| sent on August 13, 2025 (12:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also like this photo: I find intention and posture excellent; I don't like the focus very much: the focus of the machines recognizes human eyes but unfortunately here, evidently, it did not recognize anything human and therefore it focused only on the nose of the insect:.... with a focus on the eyes it would have been a whole different matter; I also add that a greater depth of field would have been more appropriate: however, having a 24-120, to obtain a greater depth of field [if you intended to obtain it] , you would have had to stay on short focal lengths; shooting instead at one hundred and twenty the depth of field was reduced to a minimum..... Metto mi piace anche a questa foto: intenzione e postura li trovo ottimi; la messa a fuoco invece non mi piace granché: la messa a fuoco delle macchine riconosce gli occhi umani ma purtroppo qui, evidentemente, non ha riconosciuto niente di umano e pertanto ha messo a fuoco solo il naso dell'insetto:....con una messa a fuoco sugli occhi sarebbe stato tutto un altro paio di maniche; aggiungo inoltre che una maggiore profondità di campo sarebbe stata più opportuna: però, disponendo di un 24-120, per ottenere una maggiore profondità di campo [sempre che fosse tua intenzione ottenerla] , avresti dovuto stare su lunghezze focali corte; scattando invece qui, a centoventi, la profondità di campo si è ridotta al minimo..... |
| sent on August 13, 2025 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Merak, thank you very much for visiting and for the very welcome comment.
I'll tell you, I had focused manually because when I shoot close-up I always prefer to focus by hand, and here I preferred to leave the detail on the "nose" more readable than on the eyes; there would have been a focus-stacking but, while I ran to retrieve the tripod, the insect flew :-)
Regarding the focal length I used the 120 because the insect was very small (calculate that the plastic peg on which it is placed is about 1 cm wide), and only the 120 allowed me to reach a magnification sufficient to make it "visible".
Thank you very much again for visiting, have a nice evening.
Antonello Ciao Merak, grazie mille per la visita e per il graditissimo commento.
Ti dirò, avevo messo a fuoco manualmente perchè quando scatto close-up preferisco sempre focheggiare a mano, e qui ho preferito lasciare più leggibile il dettaglio sul "naso" rispetto agli occhi; ci sarebbe stato bene un focus-stacking ma, mentre sono andato di corsa a recuperare il treppiede, l'insettino si è involato
In merito alla focale ho usato i 120 perchè l'insetto era molto piccolo (calcola che il piolo in plastica su cui è posato e largo circa 1 cm), e solo i 120 mi permettevano di raggiungere un ingrandimento sufficiente per renderlo "visibile".
Grazie mille ancora per la visita, buona serata.
Antonello |
| sent on August 16, 2025 (22:01)
Five-star magnificence, congratulations and best regards |
| sent on August 17, 2025 (11:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Jacub, thank you so much Ciao Jacub, grazie mille |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
