What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 17, 2024 (11:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ But how does the AF of the gfx dynamically behave? „
The first impression is positive, but I have to try it longer to give a reliable rating.
“ I beg your pardon, but how do you try a 500mm in portraiture? „
It was a hands-on of a few hours and I had no chance to photograph other subjects; probably in some future trip I will try it in the field of birds and animals.
“ In landscape photos, viewing only on a monitor (4 K) would you tangibly appreciate the difference compared to a FF BigMpx? „
If you mean looking at the whole photo, no, you can only see the difference if you zoom in, at least on a 4K screen. I think you would start to see the differences on screens at least 6K from 27" upwards, or in huge prints. " Ma l'AF delle gfx dinamicamente come si comporta?"
la prima impressione è positiva, ma devo provarla più a lungo per dare una valutazione affidabile.
" Chiedo venia ma come si fa a provare un 500 mm in ritrattistica?"
si è trattato di un hands-on di poche ore e non avevo possibilità di fotografare altri soggetti; probabilmente in qualche futuro viaggio lo proverò in ambito avifauna e animali.
" In foto di paesaggio, visualizzando solo a monitor (4 K) si apprezzerebbe tangibilmente la differenza rispetto a una FF BigMpx?"
Se intendi guardando la foto intera, no, la differenza si vede solo se vai a ingrandire, perlomeno su uno schermo 4K. Penso che si comincerebbero a vedere le differenze su schermi almeno 6K da 27" in su, o in stampe enormi. |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ If you mean looking at the whole photo, no, the difference is only visible if you zoom in, at least on a 4K screen. I think you'd start to see the differences on screens at least 6K from 27" upwards, or in huge prints. „
Thank you! " Se intendi guardando la foto intera, no, la differenza si vede solo se vai a ingrandire, perlomeno su uno schermo 4K. Penso che si comincerebbero a vedere le differenze su schermi almeno 6K da 27" in su, o in stampe enormi."
Grazie! |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (11:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Looking at the 4K monitor you can see the view outside the window reflected in the iris, Bombesca !! Guardando sul monitor 4K si vede il panorama fuori della finestra riflessa nell'iride, Bombesca !!! |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Eye and lip detail... mom mom :-) Dettaglio occhi, labbra... mamma mamma  |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (12:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The detail that can be captured doesn't surprise me too much: now big-megapixels, with the right optics, offer plenty even on smaller formats.
What I like about the performance of "large" sensors is the naturalness that you get in the results. Often with small formats (from APSC downwards) my impression, very personal, is that the yield is more "forced". I don't know how to describe it better, it's just an overall aesthetic pleasantness, which I like better if the sensor that took the image is 36x24 or higher.
Anyway, thanks Juza for sharing! Il dettaglio che si riesce a catturare non mi stupisce più di tanto: ormai le big-megapixel, con le ottiche giuste, ne offrono in abbondanza anche su formati inferiori.
Quello che mi piace nella resa di sensori "grandi" è la naturalezza che si ottiene nei risultati. Spesso con formati piccini (da APSC in giù) la mia impressione, personalissima, è che la resa sia più "forzata". Non so come descriverlo meglio, è proprio una gradevolezza estetica globale, che mi piace di più se il sensore che ha ripreso l'immagine è 36x24 o superiore.
Comunque, grazie Juza per la condivisione! |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (12:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
deadly...
Micidiale... |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (13:54) | This comment has been translated
Impressive! |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (15:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ilaria is always a guarantee of soap & water.
La Ilaria è sempre una garanZia anche acqua & sapone.
|
| sent on May 17, 2024 (18:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular!!!
Nothing that doesn't have this level of detail can be called Photography anymore.
Spettacolare!!!
Niente che non abbia questo livello di dettaglio si può più chiamare Fotografia.
|
| sent on May 17, 2024 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I hope Juza will post more photos taken with this fantastic medium format. Spero che Juza voglia pubblicare ulteriori foto scattate con questa fantastica medio formato. |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've published two more of the model (Simon) and tomorrow I'll publish the dedicated article! :-)
I have other photos of Ilaria but they are taken with the X-T50 and at the moment ACR doesn't support RAW, and I don't get along with JPEG ;-) Ne ho pubblicate altre due del modello (Simon) e domani pubblicherò l'articolo dedicato! :-)
Di Ilaria ho altre foto ma sono scattate con la X-T50 e al momento ACR non ne supporta i RAW, e con in JPEG vado poco daccordo ;-) |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (23:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really impressive. Davvero impressionante. |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (8:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The first impression is positive, but I have to try it longer to give a reliable rating.
I look forward to your final impressions..
P.s you should correct the characteristics of the 500gf because the stabilization is present ;-) la prima impressione è positiva, ma devo provarla più a lungo per dare una valutazione affidabile.
Attendo le tue impressioni definitive ..
P.s dovresti correggere le caratteristiche del 500gf perche la stabilizzazione è presente |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ P.s you should correct the characteristics of the 500gf because the stabilization is present ;-) „ Ah well, it seemed strange to me that it wasn't there...... " P.s dovresti correggere le caratteristiche del 500gf perche la stabilizzazione è presente;-)" Ah ecco, mi sembrava strano non ci fosse...... |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've corrected it :-) Ho corretto:-) |
| sent on May 21, 2024 (23:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Even the detail of the lips
with that realistic complexion, is no joke! Anche il dettaglio delle labbra
con quell'incarnato realistico, non scherza mica! |
| sent on May 23, 2024 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would like to ask @juza if this AF has taken a step forward enough to justify buying the new one at the expense of the previous 100s, considering that mine, with the 80 1.7 with a non-linear moving subject, shoots out of focus 4 out of 6 photos. Thank you Vorrei chiedere a @juza se questo AF ha fatto un passo avanti tale da giustificare l'acquisto della nuova a scapito della precedente 100s, considerando che la mia, con l'80 1.7 con un soggetto in movimento non lineare, scatti fuori fuoco 4 su 6 foto. Grazie |
| sent on May 23, 2024 (21:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think it depends on the genre of photography you intend to practice.
For example, in this case, it's a static portrait, and not an action-pic ;-) Credo che dipenda dal genere fotografico che si intende praticare.
Ad esempio, in questo caso, si tratta di un ritratto statico, e non di una action-pic |
| sent on May 23, 2024 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
X-ray of the eye. The detail is really good. Radiografia all'occhio. Veramente ottimo il dettaglio. |
| sent on May 23, 2024 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What's
the point of highlighting the detail of a frame?
What is the purpose, net of simple astonishment, of those who express this type of comment?
In my opinion, a new photographic section should be introduced, dedicated exclusively to the performance of the tools used.
IMHO, I'll make it clear,
otherwise a forty-eight will be unleashed here, guagliò! Che poi,
che senso ha, mettere in evidenza la dettagliatura di un fotogramma?
Quale è la finalità, al netto del semplice stupore, di chi esprime questo tipo di commento?
Secondo me dovrebbe essere introdotta una nuova sezione fotografica, dedicata esclusivamente alle prestazioni degli strumenti utilizzati.
IMHO, lo chiarisco,
altrimenti qui si scatena un quarantotto, guagliò! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
103.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
