What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 29, 2023 (19:13) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on November 01, 2023 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a beautiful futugraphy che bela futugrafia |
| sent on January 06, 2024 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot. It conveys the dynamism of the real scene with excellent photo quality. Congratulations, but... I need to get rid of a doubt, since I would like to buy my first Sony camera... I would like to take the A6700 which is an APSC (multiplication factor for full frame lenses equal to 1.5), and I was wondering if the aperture, in addition to the focal length, should also be multiplied by 1.5? That is, the exif data of the shot says f/5.6 at 284mm, but really it would be an f/8.4 at 426mm ??? Or am I wrong in my calculation? Thank you for your time. Hello Bellissimo scatto. Trasmette il dinamismo della scena reale con un'ottima qualità fotografica. Complimenti, ma... ho bisogno di togliermi un dubbio, visto che vorrei acquistare la mia prima fotocamera Sony... Vorrei prendere proprio la A6700 che però è un APSC (fattore di moltiplicazione per le lenti full frame uguale a 1,5), e mi chiedevo se anche l'apertura del diaframma, oltre che alla lunghezza focale, debba essere moltiplicata per 1,5? Cioè, i dati exif dello scatto dicono f/5.6 a 284mm, ma realmente sarebbe un f/8.4 a 426mm ??? Oppure sbaglio nella considerazione? Grazie per il tempo che vorrai dedicarmi. Ciao |
| sent on January 06, 2024 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you I answer you about it, as you said you would have an equivalent 426 mm as magnification, but not the same angle of view and pdc of the 284 mounted on ff, on the other hand the diaphragm remains identical, in practice you with apsc use only the central area of the lens, a crop. Greetings Grazie Ti rispondo in merito,come hai detto avresti un 426 mm equivalente come ingrandimento,ma non lo stesso angolo di campo e pdc del 284 montato su ff,di contro il diaframma rimane identico,in pratica tu con apsc utilizzi la sola zona centrale dell ottica,un ritaglio. un saluto |
| sent on January 06, 2024 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Anto55: Thank you for your reply. Useful to bring order to the confusion I had in mind. Hello Anto55: Grazie per la risposta. Utile per mettere ordine alla confusione che avevo in mente. Ciao |
| sent on February 10, 2024 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
BEAUTIFUL BEAUTIFUL BEAUTIFUL BEAUTIFUL !!!!!!! BELLA BELLA BELLA BELLA BELLA !!!!!!!! |
| sent on February 10, 2024 (22:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful scene excellently shot. (Very nice whole gallery). Congratulations Antonio Bellissima scena ottimamente ripresa. (Molto bella tutta la galleria).Complimenti Antonio |
| sent on February 12, 2024 (8:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gion65 Pierdgius Greetings Grazie Gion65 Pierdgius Un saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |