What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 16, 2023 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good morning Silvio, superb shot! Please, is there in your gallery some shots with the binomial Canon ef 400 f5.6 + Canon ef 12 II? Thank you! Buongiorno Silvio, scatto superbo! Cortesemente, c'è nella tua galleria qualche scatto con il binomio Canon ef 400 f5.6 + Canon ef 12 II? Grazie! |
| sent on April 16, 2023 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good morning Giovanna, I can not be precise in answering your question,
indicatively all the photos that are reported as shots in the garden and have aperture less than 8 could fall into the casuistry.
If you shoot with 400 + many 1.4x on the 5dmark3 you remain active the central point and the 4 adjacent
if you can make the microadjustment of the lens I would advise you to stop reading and start shooting which remains the best way to realize the situation ;-)
greetings :-) buongiorno Giovanna,non riesco ad essere preciso nel rispondere alla tua domanda,
indicativamente tutte le foto che vengono segnalate come scatti in giardino e hanno diaframma inferiore a 8 potrebbero rientrare nella casistica.
se scatti con 400 +molti 1,4x sulla 5dmark3 ti resta attivo il punto centrale e i 4 adiacenti
se riesci a effettuare la microregolazione della lente ti consiglierei di smettere di leggere e cominciare a scattare che resta il modo migliore per rendersi conto della situazione
salutoni |
| sent on April 16, 2023 (11:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Actually I was referring to your indication about the Canon 12 II (I can not see what it would give rise to mounted on the 400). Thank you and have a good Sunday! Veramente mi riferivo alla tua indicazione in merito al Canon 12 II (non riesco a visualizzare a cosa darebbe origine montato sul 400).Grazie e buona Domenica! |
| sent on April 16, 2023 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
buongiono Giovanna, the
400 5.6 Canon focuses from 3.5 meters to infinity, mounting the canon 12 II you get a focus from m 2.90 to about m 15.00, this involves being able to shoot subjects between m 2.9 and m3.5.è useful especially for small subjects, I did not want to confuse the ideas.
Hello and good Sunday buongiono Giovanna,
il 400 5,6 di Canon mette a fuoco da metri 3,5 a infinito,montandoci il canon 12 II si ottiene una messa a fuoco da m 2,90 a circa m 15,00,questo comporta il poter scattare a soggetti compresi fra m 2,9 e m3,5.è utile soprattutto per soggett di piccola taglia,non volevo confonderti le idee.
ciao e buona domenica |
| sent on April 19, 2023 (11:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good morning Silvio, thank you. Buongiorno Silvio, ti ringrazio. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
