The aqueduct of Segovia, page 2

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape with human elements

22.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Spagna 2021 View gallery (28 photos)

The aqueduct of Segovia sent on October 17, 2021 (19:16) by Juza. 23 comments, 5455 views.

, 1.3 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod. Segovia, Spain.

View High Resolution 22.9 MP Buy Usage License

123 persons like it: 1niko, Agaler Layenel, Alan Ford, Albi, Albieri Sergio, Aleicos, Alessandro Callea, Alessandro Maggiore, Alessandro57, Alessio Palazzolo, Andrea Maioglio, Andrea Rossetti, Anelanna1970, Anouk, Antonio Fabbian, Antonio Parrucci, Ardos, Aringhe Blu, Arvina, Arx, Attila Birta, Bo Larkeed, Brièxit, Bruno Cesena, Capex, Carlo Gandolfo - Spinotto, Carlo OZ, Carlogreg, Caterina Bruzzone, Ciriaco Capobianco, Cirillo Donelli, Claudio Cozzani, Claudiosquarc, Cola, Corallo, Cristiano Marchisio, Dal Cero Filippo, Daniel Florea, Diamante_P, Donna, Emilio Paolo, Enrico De Capitani, Ezio Mapelli, Fabio F77, Federico Guiati, Federico56, Fernando Vendittelli, Fiorenzo Fiorenza, Fiorenzofanton, ForeverYoung, Francesco Sartori, Francesco Verolino, Franco B, Franco Pastorino, Francofish, Fulvio Gioria, Gabribocc, Gabriele Castellari, Gabriele Cavagna, Gaia Alessandro , Giorgio Occhipinti, Giovanni e Davide, Giovanni Riccardi, Giuliano75, Gpierocompostela, Imax48, Jeant, Kalos, Kermit58, Lamahd, Lberetta69, Lince, Luca Questa, Lucaluca, Lucimast, Lukeskywalker, Lully, MadEmilio, Mafo50, Marco Riccardi, Marco50, Mario Zaramella, Mario_61, Marklevinson76, Marmor, Marzio Bambini, Matt Winston, Maurizio Cascone, Maxviii, Mnardell, Nicola1201, Nordend4612, Perseforo, Pezzatarossa, Photorick66, Pinitti, Puppodums, Quellolà, Raffaele1978, Rivo50, Roberto Degli Uomini, Roberto Tamanza, Robis di Vittorio, Roccia, Rosamaria Bidoli, Rush00, Sasha73, Scosso, Seimejotex, Sergik, Sergio Bartolomeo, Silvio Maccario, Sittar, Soriana, Star Trek, Stefania Saffioti, Supercecc56, Taranis, TheBlackbird, Tiber, w900cat, Wells, _Axl_

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Nino.ulissi

sent on October 21, 2021 (0:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As for the lamppost, I agree with Robis: it makes the postcard a little worse...

Leonardo Priami

sent on June 24, 2022 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful photo! A neophyte question... because you shot at 1.3 seconds at f/11 and 100 ISO with tripod, when maybe you could do it without a tripod ... I don't know... for example at f/3.5 and 200 ISO. To have maximum depth of fire? Thank you!

Juza

sent on June 24, 2022 (18:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all for the comments :-)

“ because you shot at 1.3 seconds at f/11 and 100 ISO with tripod, when maybe you could do it without a tripod ... I don't know... for example at f/3.5 and 200 ISO „

A f/3.5 and 200 ISO would have been slightly noisier and the depth of field would not have been enough to have everything in focus from the foreground to the background ;-)
In addition, most lenses give maximum sharpness around f/8 (in this case I closed further, at f/11, for greater depth of field).

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.