JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies Customize Refuse Cookies
RCE Foto






Login Logout Join JuzaPhoto!


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape with human elements
  4. » Sunset at Castello del Boccale
 
Sunset at Castello del Boccale

Paesaggi: Italia, Varie 3

View gallery (60 photos)

Sunset at Castello del Boccale sent on 24 Maggio 2021 (8:33) by Juza. 34 comments, 6807 views.

, 1/2 f/16.0, ISO 100, tripod.




View High Resolution 90.5 MP   Buy Usage License  

161 persons like it: 1niko, 73Salva, Actionclick, Agaler Layenel, Agata Arezzo, Agostini Renzo, Aiacos, Akidelpre, Alba75, Albi, Albieri Sergio, Alesrog, Alessandro Callea, Alessandro57, Alexcir, Alfredo64, Andrea Casolin, Andrea Console, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Apollo79, Arbjon, Aringhe Blu, Arvina, Baribal, Biancoverde, Carlo Bassi, Carlo OZ, Caterina Bruzzone, Celine, Ciandy, Ciorciari Felice, Claudio Cozzani, Claudio Del Rio, Claudio Sciarra, Dariobenji, Davide Fusco, Dede66, Delphinus, Diamante_P, Dokker, Dome P, Donna, Duri, Ecka, Eddie6630, Elias Piccioni, Elis Bolis, Enrico De Capitani, Enrico Fulco, Eosman, Fabio Cammalleri, Fabrizio_p, Federico56, Fernando Deligia, Fonzie, Francesco Sartori, Francfava91, Franco B, Fulvio Gioria, Gabrielle Martin, Gaitan, Giacomo Feroldi, Giallo63, Gianfranco Mineri, Giion, Giordano Vergani, Giorgio Bertoletti, Giorgio Guarraia, Gios, Giuliano75, Henryp982, Herman, Hobbit, Il_mancini, Indaco, IvanT, Jonphoto, Jordan79, Kalos, Lauzib74, Lazza80, Lberetta69, Leonardo Nieri, Light_89, Liquide64, Luca Battocchio, Luca Monego, Luca Questa, LucaParizzi, M.ghise, MadEmilio, Mafo50, Magù, Marco La Rosa, Marco Neri, Marco Rebesco, Marcophotographer, Marcoss, MarcoVeronese76, Marlon, MarsCr, Mascellable, Massimo Trevaini, Matley Siena, Matteo T., Matteobelletti, MatteoBio, Mau.., Maurizio Attiani, Mauro Mendula, Maverok, Maxi_Bon_88, Maxmontella, Maxspin73, Michele Marini, Mirkbon, Mnardell, NadiaB, Nordend4612, Orsobrutto, P.a.t 62, Palmieri Raimondo, Panleo1, Paolo Gualandris, Paolo la Torre, Paolo56, Paolorossi, Patrick Chu, Peppe Cancellieri, Pietro22, Quellolà, Raffaele Raf., Rickynoise, Rivilli Antonio, Rosamaria Bidoli, Rufus68, Ruggero Bertarello, Samu71405, Savastano, Sbtutu, Seipuntozero, Serrim, Sgotti, Simone O., Stefania Saffioti, Supercecc56, The.serendipiter, Thierry Tronco, Vahid_st, Valerio Colantoni, Valerio Rossato, Vasile Gori, Vincenzo 1986, vWalter, Wells, XFleshcoated, Zamax, Zeta48, Zinder, Zolikron, Zuffra


PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on 26 Maggio 2021 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Definitely a photo with difficult light but the file to see it like this is very poor had posted it any user of the forum would have received a lot of criticism for the noise present ... and the poor quality although partly due to compression.

avatarsenior
sent on 27 Maggio 2021 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

In my opinion: ok, beautiful camera, beautiful optics, beautiful location
ma, above all, beautiful realization.
Congratulations Emanuele!

avatarjunior
sent on 27 Maggio 2021 (16:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

A studio machine made more portable. probably the autofocus for the landscape is more than enough... Is the optical body system easy to carry? Would you take her to the high mountains?

avataradmin
sent on 27 Maggio 2021 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

[QUOTAS] Is the optical body system easy to carry? Would you take her to the high mountains? [/QUOTAS]
The optics are quite voluminous, but still portable even for mountain turns (obviously giving up a little lightness).

avatarsenior
sent on 05 Giugno 2021 (10:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

beautiful shot beautiful place but I also expected less noise

avatarsupporter
sent on 27 Giugno 2021 (11:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Very nice location, I paused to look at the flow of water with 1/2 second, interesting, I did something similar to Pantelleria are the Sony rIV. I just wanted to ask you a question if you can answer me: I notice a little noise, the photo is posted as taken, without posts? Thank you.

avataradmin
sent on 27 Giugno 2021 (15:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

The noise is not in the original photo, what you see here is due purely to jpeg compression (inevitably a bit marked for photos with such high resolution).

avatarsenior
sent on 27 Giugno 2021 (15:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

damn compression not excessive because it is referred to as 90 mega photo

avataradmin
sent on 27 Giugno 2021 (15:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

You should not confuse megapixels with megabytes ;-) JPEG compression acts on megaBYTES, not megapixels (so you can have lots of megapixels but quite heavy jpeg compression).

avatarsenior
sent on 27 Giugno 2021 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Thank you juza hello

avatarjunior
sent on 28 Giugno 2021 (8:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Since Photoshop now supports it.. it would be interesting to try to publish with Jpeg2000.. MOlto more efficient and with much less annoying artifacts.

avataradmin
sent on 28 Giugno 2021 (8:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

No browser (except Safari) supports it, images in Jpeg2000 are unusable on the web :-/
(see caniuse.com/jpeg2000 )

avatarjunior
sent on 28 Giugno 2021 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Too bad... I did two tests.. with the same size the difference can be seen... Squeezing so much you don't see the square artifact.. it spatulas but holds up a little more.. Even old Indeo, in the video, used that base.. disappeared even that..

avatarsenior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2022 (9:45) | This comment has been translated    

Beautiful, congratulations!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me