“ Finally someone who proposes a constructive comment and opens a discussion
. Alberto Oliviero "in particular, I find that the point of the recovery penalize considerably oltreciò known that the shades have been pulled a little beyond the limits ..."

To the point of shooting nothing to do MrGreenMrGreen since I found the subject along the banks of the lagoon with the concrete embankment, the city center. To open the shadows could not do otherwise because you would have noticed a black spot with the eye and the visible part of the body illuminated. With this subject in optimal light should underexpose because otherwise the plumage clear the burn forever, in this case the light is just the neck and seeing the shots above, during shooting, all burned, I had to underexpose by more & usevere. I have proposed in the discussion for lack of photos, but rather I have in abundance, and much more than this because the quality and everything but I like the very particular eye ball, thanks to the light, unfavorable to the rest of the subject, assumes the different colors making it alive and with three-dimensional effect and if we consider tripped with a 1000mm, it follows a PDC limited, to a subject in continuous movement that dived and re-emerging continuously, with the size of the head very small , the MAF is selective and precise. Succeed with a lens with which the duplicator and camera comes to approximately 70 cm in length with a diameter front over the 20 cm .. supported by a monopod, all cleared and standing on his knees .... this is the real challenge ;-)
Thanks
In „