What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 30, 2024 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very kind Merak, thank you so much! gentilissimo Merak, grazie mille! |
| sent on November 24, 2024 (9:01) | This comment has been translated
Nice shot! |
| sent on November 24, 2024 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much for visiting and commenting, Merak.dubhe! Grazie molte per visita e commento, Merak.dubhe! |
| sent on January 06, 2025 (0:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A truly evocative atmosphere, that thread of fog infuses a bit of mystery into an image that is splendid in terms of composition and colors. congratulations! Greetings, Marcello Atmosfera davvero suggestiva, quel filo di nebbia infonde un po' di mistero ad un'immagine splendida per composizione e colori. Complimenti! Un saluto, Marcello |
| sent on January 06, 2025 (1:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Truly remarkable. Elegant and impactful. With a remarkable geometric regularity of the lights. Orange yellow on cold gray is also beautiful. The only note I don't really understand the settings. 1/125 (freehand time) at iso 6400 and aperture open with the tripod? It gave noise, mellowness and avoidable artifacts, in that context... With the tripod you put ISO 100 and away with a long time (you are not photographing stars without wanting trails) and smaller aperture. In any case, the final result, unless you insist on looking at the pixel level, was not affected too much, it is beautiful. Veramente notevole. Elegante e d'impatto. Con una notevole regolarità geometrica delle luci. Bello anche il giallo arancio su grigio freddo. Unico appunto non capisco davvero i settaggi. 1/125 (tempo da mano libera) a iso 6400 e diaframma aperto col treppiede? Ha dato rumore, pastosità e artefatti evitabili, in quel contesto... col treppiede metti iso 100 e via di tempo lungo (non stai fotografando stelle senza volere le scie) e diaframma più chiuso. In ogni caso, il risultato finale, a meno di non insistere a guardare a livello pixel, non ne ha risentito troppo, è bella. |
| sent on January 06, 2025 (9:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marcello, thank you very much for the comment. It was in fact an evening when there was a mixture of rain and fog, which made the atmosphere more mysterious. Claudio, thank you very much for the visit and the comment, which is very right. I don't remember if I had actually used the tripod, but it's especially the high ISOs that don't really make sense. Consider that the photo is from 2017, among the first I posted, they are sins of youth ;-) . However, I am struck by the fact that despite these inconsistencies, the result is appreciated by many! Marcello, grazie mille per il commento. Era in effetti una serata in cui c'era un misto pioggia e nebbia, che ha reso l'atmosfera più misteriosa. Claudio, molte grazie per la visita e il commento, peraltro giustissimo. Non ricordo se avessi effettivamente usato il treppiede, ma sono soprattutto gli ISO così alti a non avere davvero senso. Considera che la foto é del 2017, tra le prime che ho postato, sono peccati di gioventù . Mi colpisce comunque il fatto che nonostante queste incongruenze, il risultato sia apprezzato da molti! |
| sent on January 06, 2025 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, very good subject and composition still "make" the photo, and compensate for the "technical" errors in large part. Si, soggetto e composizione molto validi "fanno" comunque la foto, e compensano gli errori "tecnici" in buona parte. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |