What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 31, 2018 (23:15) | This comment has been translated
Thanks everyone for the comments! |
| sent on November 01, 2018 (10:50) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on November 11, 2018 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Exact essential and perfectly realized
great glance
compliments ;-) Esatto essenziale e perfettamente realizzato
Ottimo colpo d'occhio
Complimenti |
| sent on November 15, 2018 (14:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A magical background...... Wonderful....
Hello Raymond Un sottofondo magico…...STUPENDA….
Ciao Raimondo |
| sent on December 08, 2018 (16:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful Autumn image Bellissima immagine autunnale |
| sent on December 19, 2018 (8:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, beautiful colors Ottimo scatto, bei colori |
| sent on July 16, 2020 (8:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An intriguing photograph.
Amenically taken up from below, with an excellent frame and composition, personally I would not have succumbed to the temptation of use in TA but rather I would have closed a diaphragm, or even two, so as to have the whole family of mushrooms in focus.
I know that they are personal choices and as such are not discussed, but since the blurring of the background would have remained well accentuated, and therefore well present, better readability of the foreground I think would have benefited not a little.
In any case congratulations, it is a very successful photograph.
Hello, Paul. Una fotografia intrigante.
Ottimamente ripresa dal basso, con una inquadratuta e una composizione eccellenti, personalmente non avrei ceduto alla tentazione dell'uso a TA ma piuttosto avrei chiuso di un diaframma, o anche due, in modo da avere tutta la famigliola di funghetti a fuoco.
Lo so che sono scelte personali e in quanto tali non si discutono, ma dal momento che la sfocatura dello sfondo sarebbe rimasta comunque ben accentuata, e quindi ben presente, una migliore leggibilità del primo piano credo avrebbe giovato non poco.
In ogni caso complimenti, è una fotografia molto ben riuscita.
Ciao, Paolo. |
| sent on July 16, 2020 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to Paul's suggestion, I got caught up in the opportunity to take advantage of the opening of sigma 35A :-D
In fact, it was enough to close at f2.8 to get a right PDC!
I'm not 100% sure though maybe I have some photos of the same subject with different openings, I have to check in my archive :-) Grazie del suggerimento Paolo, mi sono fatto prendere la mano dalla possibilità di sfruttare l'apertura del sigma 35A
In effetti bastava chiudere a f2.8 per avere una giusta PDC!
Non sono sicuro al 100% però forse ho qualche foto dello stesso soggetto con aperture differenti, devo verificare nel mio archivio |
| sent on July 16, 2020 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I must say dear David that 35/1.4 is the only Art I have had the opportunity to try, at least so far, and everything good is said about it is deserved.
I have done the tests on the slide, and my impression is that although very high already in TA the sharpness still increases up to f 2.8 which, honestly, seems to me the best diaphragm even if in this case the difference is really minimal.
Good evening,
Paolo. Devo dire caro Davide che il 35/1,4 è l'unico Art che abbia avuto modo di provare, almeno finora, e tutto quanto di buono si dice di esso è strameritato.
Io le prove le ho fatte su diapositiva, e la mia impressione è che seppure altissima già a TA la nitidezza aumenti ancora fino a f 2,8 che, onestamente, mi sembra il diaframma migliore di questo obiettivo anche se in questo caso la differenza è davvero minima.
Buona serata,
Paolo. |
| sent on July 16, 2020 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The 35A is a gorgeous optics, probably the best I've ever had. At f2.8-4 it's really sharp from the center to the edges. Unfortunately I was forced to sell it to monetize, in a period of great expense due to an imminent transfer... In the future I could buy it again :-D Il 35A è un ottica stupenda, probabilmente la migliore che abbia mai avuto. A f2.8-4 è veramente nitidissimo dal centro fino ai bordi. Purtroppo sono stato costretto a venderlo per monetizzare, in un periodo di grosse spese a causa di un imminente trasferimento... In futuro potrei acquistarlo nuovamente |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
36.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
