What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 14, 2012 (22:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the shot is gorgeous! quoto Nintai on pp. lo scatto è stupendo! quoto nintai sulla pp. |
| sent on November 14, 2012 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Paradisiac by! stu-pen-da !!! |
| sent on November 15, 2012 (0:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, despite the resume point, anomalous, the shot is very nice, well-defined and illuminated, the moment caught is "different" from the usual ... good ciao, malgrado il punto di ripresa, anomalo, lo scatto è molto bello, ben definito ed illuminato, il momento colto è "diverso" dal solito... bravo |
| sent on November 15, 2012 (6:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
point ri recovery unfortunately forced by the fact that perches prepareto that I do not like is every day, but on a sprig on board the river, the banks are high, on pp. understand the doubts are unfortunately not very practical .... il punto ri ripresa purtroppo e obbligato dal fatto che i posatoi che gli ho prepareto non gli piacciono, viene tutti i giorni ma su un rametto a bordo fiume , gli argini sono alti,sulla pp capisco i dubbi purtroppo non sono praticissimo.... |
| sent on November 15, 2012 (10:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great pose and colors, but there is far too much noise reduction which takes away all the fine detail.
I suggest you take a look at this article to a reduction in noise more delicate! :-)
www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=it&article=23 Ottima posa e colori, ma c'è decisamente troppa riduzione rumore che toglie tutto il dettaglio fine. Ti consiglio di dare un'occhiata a questo articolo per fare una riduzione rumore più delicata! :-) www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=it&article=23 |
| sent on November 15, 2012 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo beautiful, apart from the detail lost on the red feathers, but the feathers and the background have a green emerald, I see it just me? Foto stupenda, a parte il dettaglio perso sulle piume color rosso, ma le penne e lo sfondo hanno una dominante verde smeraldo, la vedo solo io? |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (7:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great beautiful moment caught Gran bel momento colto |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (8:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Just gorgeous Semplicemente stupenda |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree that the photo is beautiful, colors and time to read. for the PP I mean Sepofa “ What they found in the PP some people wrong? it seems to me perfectly in that „ is known (although we do not have the high resolution version, which is worse) a great deal of noise reduction, which consequently impatato colors and therefore not helping much sharpness of forms and come off color (see the plumage and the beginning of the branch, which seem brushed with the watercolor). This added to a sharpen a little exaggeration has also created some halos and straight lines that did not exist in the real image, artifacts in general for short.
@ Nicola Paoloemilio Everything I repeat that excludes the beauty of the photos and read the time, we say that could beand even more beautiful. only our obsession with fix with software that actually sometimes is not adjustable but it is acceptable, or at least that is my thought See you soon and good light FABIO Sono d'accordo che la foto sia stupenda, per cromie e momento colto. per la PP mi riferisco a Sepofa " cosa hanno trovato nella PP alcuni utenti che non va ? a me pare perfetta anche in quella " , si nota (anche se non abbiamo la versione ad alta risoluzione, e questo è peggio) una grande dose di riduzione del rumore, che ha conseguentemente impatato i colori e quindi non aiutando molto la nitidezza delle forme e degli stacchi cromatici (vedi il piumaggio e l'inizio del ramo, che sembrano pennellati con l'aquerello). Questo sommato ad uno sharpen un po esagerato ha creato anche alcuni aloni e tratti rettilinei che nell'immagine reale non esistevano, artefatti in genere per farla breve. @Paoloemilio nicola Tutto ciò ribadisco che esclude la bellezza della foto e del momento colto, diciamo che potrebbe essere ancora più bella. è solo la nostra mania di voler aggiustare col software quello che in realtà a volte non è aggiustabile ma è accettabile, o almeno questo è il mio pensiero A presto e buona luce FABIO |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, great time hello Molto bella, ottimo momento ciao |
| sent on March 29, 2013 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with PP who recommended a more discreet and less invasive, the artifacts are several, in a fit that is very beautiful in color and attitude of the subject. see you soon Concordo con chi ha consigliato una PP più discreta e meno invasiva, gli artefatti sono parecchi, in uno scatto che è molto bello per colori ed atteggiamento del soggetto. a presto |
| sent on March 30, 2013 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |