RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Photos of tests, Canon 1DX to ISO 51200

 
Photos of tests, Canon 1DX to ISO 51200...

Varie

View gallery (59 photos)

Photos of tests, Canon 1DX to ISO 51200 sent on August 28, 2012 (9:34) by JuzaPhoto Samples. 26 comments, 18399 views. [retina]

con Canon EF 1.4x III, 1/6400 f/8.0, ISO 51200, hand held.




View High Resolution 17.9 MP  



PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on August 29, 2012 (9:50)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


" " La nikon ha anche riduzione rumore on-Chip o sbaglio? "

Questa penso che la usi qualsiasi marca, entro un certo limite.
"

Scriveveo dal cellulare e mi sono espresso male, mi sembra che Nikon applichi una leggera riduzione anche sul RAW e che quindi i dati non siano "grezzissimi"

"The nikon also has on-chip noise reduction is not it?"

I think this uses any brand, to a certain extent.

Scriveveo the phone and I expressed myself badly, I feel that Nikon applies a slight reduction even on RAW and then the data are not "grezzissimi"

avatarsupporter
sent on August 29, 2012 (15:21)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


esatto Barone.

exact Barone.

avatarsupporter
sent on September 01, 2012 (22:38)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


piu che altro mi domando come fai a recuperare cosi le foto senza perdere molti dettagli...

more than anything else I wonder how do you recover photos without losing so many details ...

avatarsenior
sent on September 02, 2012 (0:13)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ciao Barone,vorrei aggiungere una cosa riguardo ai raw nikon che dicono che non sono veri,però si dice che dopo il secondo di esposizione interviene un software esterno per la riduzione del rumore oltre quello della macchina,infatti in astronomia o almeno era sconsigliabile utilizzare i corpi nikon per appunto per il fatto che i raw non sono veri e dopo una lunga esposizione la riduzione del rumore cancellava le stelle più deboli!allora se andate a vedere le mie foto astronomiche non vedo assolutamente stelle cancellate e non voglio essere polemico, ma io non ci credo di questo fatto, e continuo felicemente a scattare ogni genere di foto e sono molto contento!!

Hello Baron, I would like to add something about the raw nikon who say that are not true, but it is said that after the second exposure involving an external software for noise reduction over that of the machine, in fact in astronomy or at least it was not advisable to use the nikon bodies for just for the fact that they are not real and raw after a long exposure noise reduction erased the fainter stars! then if you go to see my pictures I see absolutely astronomical star deleted and do not want to be argumentative, but I I do not believe this fact, and I continue to happily take all kinds of photos and I'm very happy!

avatarsenior
sent on September 02, 2012 (15:39)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Non metto in dubbio le tue foto anche perchè di Astrofotografia non me ne intendo, ma credo che se avesse cancellato qualche stella nelll'universo difficilmente te ne saresti accorto non trovi?
Comunque credo che sia una cosa abbastanza assodata, non è la prima volta che ne sento parlare e non credo sia una questione di campanilismo, ma diversa gestione del file nativo, ognuno applica i propri "trucchi" quel che conta è il risultato finale, infatti elaborando i RAW di D4 e 1DX si trovano risultati pressochè identici nonostante il rumore di partenza della 1DX sembri maggiore e nonostante le esposizioni non combacino perfettamente.

I do not doubt your own photos of Astrophotography also because I do not understand, but I think if he had deleted a few stars nelll'universo unlikely you would have noticed is not it?
However, I think it's a fairly well-founded, it is not the first time I've heard of and I do not think it's a matter of pride, but different native file management, each applies its own "tricks" that matters is the end result, it processing the RAW D4 and 1DX results are almost identical despite the noise of the departure of 1DX seems more and despite exposures do not fit perfectly.

avatarjunior
sent on September 18, 2013 (22:01)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Juza capisco che sei affezzionato a Canon ma credimi Nikon in fatto di qualità non è certo inferiore.

Juza I understand you're affezzionato but believe me Nikon to Canon in terms of quality is not inferior.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me