JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies Customize Refuse Cookies
RCE Foto






Login Logout Join JuzaPhoto!


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » hook up
 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Dick Story

View gallery (2 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on 24 Aprile 2016 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

But it is not a social art photography?

avatarjunior
sent on 24 Aprile 2016 (21:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

To move to the "birds" section ... :-D

avatarsenior
sent on 25 Aprile 2016 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

and to me this was censored ..
[URL =] www.flickr.com/photos/falenafoto/10222731485/in/album-7215763684193133
because it was considered pesantaemente explicit and vapid.
but I agree that my project was proposed too soon ... if I knew that it came to this now I could propose.
the acceptance or rejection of a shot is often subordinated to its limitation culturale..spesso justified in defining the atrui work as obscene or qunt'altro.
shame on my theme I wanted to continue, but be content to others that demonstrate more consistent in mindset.
I see that there is only one woman comentare very bad .... I would say ...

avatarsenior
sent on 25 Aprile 2016 (13:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

This gentleman mail this shot of the c ... or just to be talked about, it's best to ignore it, not to comment on these shots of the c ... or, 's the last time I make a comment on these photos of c. ..or, I swear

avatarsenior
sent on 25 Aprile 2016 (15:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

But we are talking of Photography or sexual preferences?
As for the shot I find it very well executed, cut, light and framing are interesting and the male subject stressed and "celebrated."
If we speak of sexual preferences I fear that so many comments praising pornography are more dictated by the goose with envy for a nice male physique, proportionate and toned!

avatarjunior
sent on 25 Aprile 2016 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

but it was not a social artistic photos?

avatarsenior
sent on 25 Aprile 2016 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

not comment on these shots or the c ...

Pier Mario six limitato..non understand a c .... or. ;-) You are the problem not who triggered ........

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (8:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

No no the problem are those that giving positive feedback to these obrobri, Fale hello and good day, and now at work

avatarsupporter
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (8:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Honestly I find it inappropriate to your comment Pier Mario seems to me that the most vulgar and infastidente photo .... Good Light

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (9:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Pier Mario then talk about what you comment?

[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1801048&l=it

[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1773840&l=it

[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1708082&l=it


A minimum of coherence, this is done benequelle are pathetic comments yet positively, let's not be hypocrites about.

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (10:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Labirint, those are photos of spirits have a laugh, this no, the Loganetti answers questions while this author no, if you ask the meaning of this picture Mica tells you

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

So those are not pictures, do not light management, the installation, nothing, no spirits.
this author has mastery of light and composition that if you deign to observe you would notice some care.
If we want to see sense you can throw the naked gallery because I want to see how many respond with a concept and not with: I wanted to represent beauty, plasticity, a body etc .. but with an idea of ??a real project.
It makes sense related to a project or is it just cosmetic? This will tell if the author wants, certainly as he admitted is influenced by Giampaolo Barbieri and tell you that if you go and see photos of Dark Memories we see the strong appeal and maybe you realize that crap are those of others and not these.

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (10:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Hello Labirint no offense greetings and good day, fine thread, for Mario, now I have to work

avatarjunior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (11:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

I am very worried.
This and the other two images that Francis Sestili shows how blatant examples of bad taste, it is the recent pictures that I find most interesting.
Also, while other times I do not share the opinion of Labirint, this time I agree with him.
This means that my situation is really serious.
Greetings to all
BDM

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

this time I agree with him

What about ... it had to happen sooner or later: -D: -D: -D

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (13:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

6ograve; in the afternoon; I'm sorry for you but you can not not from entering comments :-D.

avatarsupporter
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (13:47)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ma voi i fotografi famosi non li guardate mai? Come in tutta l'arte si dovrebbero conoscere molto bene quelli che hanno segnato un percorso.. Anche nel nudo maschile... Mi pare che ci si scandalizzi perché si vede un membro in erezione ( per cortesia evitare la parola c.. Stiamo parlano do fotografia) come se fosse una cosa da non vedere, beh mi pare un po sessista ehehehe. Mi fa sorridere l' accanimento nel capire cosa voleva dire l'autore, allora vale per tutti, in ogni foto andrà dichiarato cosa si voleva rappresentare. Il discorso si fa più ampio in relazione non alla specifica foto ma a ciò che sia la libertà di rappresentazione. Aggiungo e non me ne stancherò mai.. leggere commenti sia che siano foto maschili che femminili relative alla bellezza o meno del soggetto, o peggio commenti volgare soprattutto su fotomodelle lo trovo degradante, quello sì per chi scrive quelle cose. Ma mai nessuno si è fatto avanti a dire che scrivere certe cose è indegno di chi fa della fotografia la propria passione.    


avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (14:42)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


veramente io mi chiedo, perché vi mette così a disagio un pene eretto di un ragazzo e non un c**o di una donna pronta per una colonscopia, o una vagina pronta per una visita ginecologica?
Siamo veramente così indietro, veramente il nostro pensiero è così retrogrado?
Veramente così suscettibili allo scandalo per cose tutto sommato naturali?


Concordo, mi chiedo se siamo qui per valutare "la foto" o "il soggetto della foto", nel primo caso dovremmo osservarla con occhio imparziale, nel secondo mi chiedo come mai non siano intervenute fotografe di sesso femminile.

Vengono postate alcune foto di nudo al femminile che tecnicamente non meriterebbero la minima approvazione eppure riscuotono consensi, bisogna ritenere a questo punto che si valuta la patata o la tetta invece del tecnicismo fotografico, l'abilità di colui che scatta e di posare del soggetto.

La foto in argomento: Buona nel complesso.    


avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (14:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

I think there is shocked because you see a member in erection (please avoid the word c .. We do talk about photography) as if it were a thing not to see, well it seems a little sexist ehehehe. It makes me smile the 'obstinacy in understanding what it meant to the author

Do not I think I agree that it's fine what you see and not good on what you call it (which still falls under the category of the vernacular that I do not appreciate). As for what it means to say that the author is essential; it does not, I could see in a picture what he has not seen, what he did not understand. Two possibilities; or unable to make themselves understood without speaking or from the opposite and then has to explain himself. In one way or another you have to get to what he had in his head otherwise wasted time and does spbear.

avatarsenior
sent on 26 Aprile 2016 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

I would say that at most is little innovative






RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me