What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 19, 2016 (0:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
: -o Beautiful !! a salutone Stefano
Francis  bellissimo!! un salutone Stefano
francesco |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (0:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photo compliments Gran foto complimenti |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (7:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Applauses Applausi |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (7:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful realization and great detail.
Greetings, Loris. Bellissima realizzazione e grande dettaglio.
Un saluto, Loris. |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful light for a perfect picture, very good, congratulations Bellissima luce per un ritratto perfetto, bravissimo, complimenti |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Steff good, congratulations! :-or Ottima Steff, complimenti! |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Amazing ... really compliments. Straordinaria... complimenti davvero. |
| sent on April 19, 2016 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very very beautiful, great detail, light and composition. Compliments Molto molto bella, ottimo dettaglio, luce e composizione. Complimenti |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in fact it is stratospheric, but you want to bet that if the photographer
the warbler to 4.5m away with 7D II and 600 f4 with 1.4 the result is the same? :-D ;-)
Fabio in effetti è stratosferica, ma vuoi scommettere che se fotografo
l'occhiocotto a 4,5m di distanza con 7D II e 600 f4 con 1,4 il risultato è lo stesso?  
Fabio |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gorgeous.
hello Ale Bellissima.
Ciao Ale |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Truly a quality top. :-P Veramente una qualita al top. |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (13:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really beautiful shot around
Maximum Scatto veramente molto bello in tutto
Massimo |
| sent on April 20, 2016 (23:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ the warbler to 4.5m away with 7D II and 600 f4 with 1.4 the result is the same? „
Fabio, if you try the 5dsr then touches you spend, stay away :-D
1000 thanks to all! " l'occhiocotto a 4,5m di distanza con 7D II e 600 f4 con 1,4 il risultato è lo stesso?"
Fabio,se provi la 5dsr poi ti tocca spendere,stai alla larga
grazie 1000 a tutti! |
| sent on April 21, 2016 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Super female warbler Super femmina di occhiocotto |
| sent on April 26, 2016 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
seguo con interesse queste prove in quanto è una macchina che interesserebbe anche a me; da abbinare ad un 100/400II oppure al classico 400 f5,6 e non ad un super potente siluro tipo il 500.
ora sollevo un mio dubbio che forse è solo mio: ho l'impressione scattando in genere a soggetti molto vicini che tutte le macchine se correttamente settate non sbagliano la maf...oppure in pochi casi.
il grosso dubbio mi viene invece proprio sulla maf di soggetti piccoli o anche medi a distanza importante vedi 30/40 mt.
Ho paura che il limite non è costituito dalla qualità del file ma dal fatto che mettendo a fuoco con piu difficoltà (soggetto piccolo nel fotogramma, elementi di disturbo presenti rametti etc etc) quello sia il vero tendine di achille! Piccole imprecisioni che magari fanno perdere di qualità, che poi ritagliando si percepisce.
Ed interessante sarebbe spingere verso i 1600 iso (con espo corretta comunque) per capire meglio.
Cmq grazie steff per la condivisione!! |
| sent on May 21, 2016 (7:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
: -o: -o This is really the space .....
roby questa è davvero spaziale.....
roby |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
