RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » spring time

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



ritratti

View gallery (8 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on April 02, 2016 (23:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have not read any criticism.
Criticism is another thing, and usually shows positive or negative technical, cultural and knowledge of the author.
The opinions expressed by users do not contain elements of criticism by their nature, whether positive (nice picture, I love) or negative (bad picture, I do not like) objectively have no ability to enrich a discussion, and consequently leave the time they they find.

avatarsenior
sent on April 02, 2016 (23:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I state that I very rarely go into this section because the nude photos do not like as a photographic genre and a naked woman the much prefer to live ... but entered the home :-D appeared at the top (probably because filiberto being one mei of contacts, has written here) ..
I read the discussion and although the first Filiberto answer was very direct and not very explanatory, I'd say he later fully explained the reason for his "disgust" .. Personally I agree with what he said, but beyond this, if one then you take the trouble to give a criticism (much more useful than a "how beautiful" - although this may always give pleasure), I think is pretty ridiculous to talk about taxation when one of the defense lawyers are trying to impose their own appreciation.
Bitwell i say that filiberto is nobody has the comic. First of all for the expertise he has always shown in every forum speech .. Then well, the statistics speak for themselves and when these demonstrate the high regard of the "public" of the forum, which usually lie, I would say that we can not just add another except that Filiberto is a forum resource and that it is also an opportunity to receive a critique, even "fierce", for its part.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (0:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Oggettoindistruttibile:
To me it seems that Filiberto in his second intervention has expressed a precise and constructive criticism (and shareable for me). He talked about background, light, Model posture. He did it clearly and constructively (albeit with a blunt language). Therefore I do not share your statement. The second intervention of Filiberto the author can draw useful suggestions to improve his shots.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (0:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This picture seems to me: Cestinabile, Abominable, criticism, Agghiacciande (Count dixit), a little 'Ridiculous, execrable ... :-D :-D :-D (this is from week puzzles, let's see who guesses ...; -): cool :)

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (0:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Diego-v-73 the fact that you do not agree with my statement or even the entire speech is legitimate. Of course I do not pretend to have the unconditional sharing of anyone.
Unfortunately I stand by my idea. The criticism and the critics are another thing and express themselves with anything but the language and arguments.
I hope that you also recognize the legitimacy of my statements even if the share.
Coming to the photos of Braccio da Montone, of course it is not a picture to be displayed in an art gallery but has elements for evaluation and investigation
Braccio da Montone for those unfamiliar with him a sharp and provocative style, the disturbances are a constant presence in his photographs. in this case the adhesive tape, in cases other furnishings or drapes. These elements give his pictures a ricercata sloppiness (do not think that photography is only one coated) Typical suburban environments. Other times, however, is capable with the same elements to create more sophisticated situations, in short, has a style that you have to know to judge.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (5:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

to me just sorry for the lady ridiculed.

user39791
avatar
sent on April 03, 2016 (8:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The oggettoindistruttibile do not question whether or not that there is an aesthetic of ugliness (.....
a sought sloppiness
......), the less I consider to be a critic 'art. I also know little or nothing about the work of this author, I honestly do not think I pursue it, so my judgment is relative to this single photo. Photo that was published in a public forum, then in my view legitimately be criticized (carry-over from Wikipedia - for criticism means the activity consisting in the analysis and assessment of any situation in any context) for better or for worse. I rarely criticize a photo, but in this case I have not held back, not only because I consider it a nice picture but because I consider it demeaning towards the woman portrayed.A photo that tells me a great sadness, a kind of photos you do not expect to see me here published. For my part I close now hoping that my sincerity has not offended anyone, otherwise I apologize for the inadvertence of my act.

avatarsupporter
sent on April 03, 2016 (8:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Finmalmente returned Arm From Montone, you alone we present eros timeless engine that keeps us revved up for a lifetime. Graziexmille, Bravissimo-FB-

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (9:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Subject indestructible, however, I do not believe it is acceptable to take now as a defensive line that the author tries to respect evidence to convey the feeling of being in a country of the Soviet bloc in 1970. If this kind of photography is not for everyone, I think to be the author himself to explain the reason for these choices or at least decrease the observer in a given context. I'm not one of those fundamentalists who argue that a photo should not be explained, because behind questionable choices there are often specific reasons and the desire to create a stir. But it no longer makes sense, then, to add a caption? Who looks at a photo published in a public forum is not required to know all the work of one author.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (9:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The nude is not my thing and never comment. I found myself once again to criticize from the ram arm that was carrying out a project. In time, I like many others we realized that the arm with the images we was making a speech and that this narrative is revealed more and more interesting.
Before you judge positively or negatively expect the end of his speech.
There are pictures that can be judged by the sun. ..... But only from a technical point of view .... and projects that are taken as a whole. ...the
I think that photography is something broader than the single image.
A note to Arm is that it has removed the previous photo.

avatarsupporter
sent on April 03, 2016 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Andrea ... (Vulture) I happened to see the discussion ... I state that if I want to see pictures of naked technically sound
I look at other sites ....
The picture does not attract me technically ... but I think I also know the boy who posted ....
This picture does not studied by the idea of ??the woman who strips to the viewer in an intimate context without however
go over how you happened to see ..
Technically is not true, however sublime ......
OK massacratemi well :-D :-D
I just wrote what I perceived at a glance without analyzing lights, composition, golden mean ... I gave up also research non-trivial zeros of the function Z :-D :-D

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

and 'curious as if one receives a positive critical thank as he receives a negative ask to be ignored.
This is called the forum to grow together.



avatarsupporter
sent on April 03, 2016 (11:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Arm has its own very specific style, questionable, focused, rough, consistent, challenging, realistic, contemporary, irreverent, instinctive, low key.
And 'one of the few non-professional photographers I know who has very clear his "method", as opposed to many professional photographers who know that they try to get to where they can not try to be what they are not.

avatarjunior
sent on April 03, 2016 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

26quot; I want to clarify once again that the publication of all my photos is done with the full consent of the person portrayed.
- Grekon
I would love that the comments were "seasoned" with a touch of intellectual honesty. If you show me where and when I would have called the Cartier Bresson of the millennium promise that gate I immediately from the forum and run to get hospitalized in a nursing home.
- Paolomasct
Kudos to the fine humor and for the profound contribution that you have given to the discussion. I'd like some of those who have spoken here tell me how would reply to a comment like their own pictures.
Greetings to all
BDM

user39791
avatar
sent on April 03, 2016 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

While remaining absolutely my opinion makes me genuinely pleased for you that many users appreciate this photo. As I am very pleased to note that your photos are always published with the permission of the models. For this kind of picture is essential in my opinion.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion modest criticize is one thing (and there is also arrives without Wikipedia), is another offense, as unworthy to give a picture of naked in a bare section of a forum is inclined more toward the offense that critics .

Probably only an output of the unfortunate Filiberto estimated that in a previous post has already apologized if, unwittingly, had offended the author.

The game of all those who have taken on Arm elevating the "shield Filiberto" was rather childish.

Regarding the photos, I can only quote Million, with his analysis has kindly given us a complete reading and free from misconceptions.

user39791
avatar
sent on April 03, 2016 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Now really close, Nicola oh well the spirit social and political correctness, but do not say what you think for fear of offending I find it petty. The author can publish all the pictures you want, God forbid, but if a picture for me (beyond the good or the bad) is repeat myself:
demeaning towards women portrayed
I say regardless that like it or not. The author can get stuck and you can lose the esteem in my regard, all right is your right to do so. I repeat that I am happy for the author that the majority of users spoke about this photo thinks so completely different from what I think. Over and out!

user14286
avatar
sent on April 03, 2016 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

And anyway, dear Poison, has the most beautiful photo of "your". So has more right than you to a critical educated.

I have not read any "critical educated".
Leaving aside the first post, where there is even talk of "photo unworthy" ... type "outputs sorry for the lady ridiculed", "I find it demeaning for the lady" etc. not constructive criticism would call, but only attempts to impose their own taste as if it were the gold standard of artistic nude, so I do not see what kind of these "learned response" would claim to receive: ok, the photo makes you sick, you have He said, now get out of my c.oglioni. or we should also discuss your taste ???


avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (14:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you can justify anything and everything. without a shared framework, the discussion could go on forever. The photos frankly, is very mediocre. of course, just a bit 'of dialectics, you can weave an entire book of photographic criticism in favor of shooting the author, inventing meanings to us mere mortals will probably escape. however, I do not think that the author of the picture is known as an artist prominent in this field. I wish him best of luck, of course. the story is full of misunderstood artists. my two cents.

avatarsenior
sent on April 03, 2016 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Certain that dust this photo has risen so much, but it is not nice to turn the comments in quarrels, behave gentlemanly :-)

I think this photo is no worse than many and appreciated (excuse the vulgarity) crap that are in the nude section where the comments are very technical and like "what a beautiful potato" etc., etc., the author always in my humble opinion immortalized a woman when undressing, then, if your feet are not beautiful or has other defects, well then let's put it in writing: in the nude section will only accept perfect subject :-)
That said to me the photo like it because it tells a particular time

Greetings to all

Peace and Love



RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me