RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » Curves # 1

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



CURVES SERIES

View gallery (21 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user


PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on November 23, 2015 (8:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Apart from the usual arguments I personally do not bother me. The male nude are centuries that there is art that I know see sculpture, photography etc. (perhaps sooner than the female)
Always personally in this type of nude photos I would prefer the two side lights that sculpt perhaps better body.
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1584224&l=it
in the picture of this link left hand part of the model disappear not creating a pleasing to the eye.
In this I see a cut too, net of side profiles, which always do not agree, but maybe it was a choice of the author but not a bad picture for me ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on November 23, 2015 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

it is useless to represent the male nude is a statement a little too risky because already examples of male nude are everywhere, both in pictures and sculpture. what puzzles me in the whole series is the excessive use of masking that makes unnatural all the work. say that the best of 24-70 55-250 .. work ... is like the statement of the futility of the male taste.

specifically, I find that it is a photo that without the use of the masking and without the use of harsh lights, which are not handled with caution at the time of recovery but in post, would have little to tell even if resumption a female body. If evaluated within the other shots in the series it has its own path.

friendliness
fabio



avatarsenior
sent on November 23, 2015 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

On this site there are pictures of naked women poor, close-ups of a vagina meaningless, compositions and poor lighting poor, yet they take those pictures "like" as well as a string of comments from the bar.

However, if one placed a nude male then shouts to crap, even if the photo is objectively very good.

I'm disgusted.

user26730
avatar
sent on November 23, 2015 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Amen!
Max

avatarjunior
sent on November 23, 2015 (22:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Splash, is so ridiculous your comment that I find an answer is suitable. So much so, you would not understand if you did not understand a picture like that. Opnione staff course. Hello.

avatarsenior
sent on November 25, 2015 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Even splash as jumor73 will be "banned" from other comments? I would like to read their answers .....

avatarjunior
sent on November 26, 2015 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sunblack, I do not support people rude, really. So the answer is you =)
I know it's bad block a user, but it is my page and it seems right to do if it bothers me. I mean, I do not mind if someone criticizes me in a "negative" or says it's not like my pictures or who is hurt, etc., but does say that ship is moving please ...

avatarsenior
sent on December 05, 2015 (9:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not think the solution is to ban.
Of course if you become insistent and pedantic you could get, but for comment
Direct you can not immediately ban.
At the bottom of your shot he has somehow involved in good and evil.
One that says "crap" (which certainly do not think is the case) is something certainly was hit, and the problem, if there is,
evidentemnte is his.
Then ban those who remain involved also "negatively" I do not think it is producing for a photographer.
For my part, I find the photos applicable (pass me the term) in a context like advertising:
model with nice body, equipped, well photographed, and a PP pesantuccia.
A photo that alone says little,testualizzandola might have a reason.

avatarjunior
sent on December 05, 2015 (16:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Splash van good only women so you can masturbate on the photos?

user26730
avatar
sent on December 05, 2015 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Samy!
Max

avatarsenior
sent on December 05, 2015 (19:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

With this photo (not because of him) opened na polemicuccia bar: fconfuso:
pity

avatarjunior
sent on December 08, 2015 (12:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

haha you Xaw, opened a polemicuccia =)
however I appreciate that you have commented on was positive with the comment ...
I hope to have more photos with other controversies =)

avatarjunior
sent on December 28, 2015 (0:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm a super amateur, yet little technique I understand and I rely on the comments of those who understand more trying to learn. I have never competed in the nude, and I do not know if I ever will because I do not feel able. But one thing I can say .. I laugh for such comments sucks .. The male nude you can see .. The penis in sight is vulgar ... well as for other subjects and genres I like to see the works of the great Cartier Bresson and say .. Or McCurry likewise for male nudes I appreciated the madness jobs Mappletorpe I was lucky enough to see live. Seen those, read why photographed smile to hear that the sculpture is another thing.
That said Alison me your photographs like, obviously some more some less and more I have to say that in a gallery of naked're the 'only to post nude photos maschile and this is about and honor.

PS in all pictures of female nudes are too many comments and vulgar barracks which also give enough nuisance ... Models are beautiful ... beautiful .. NOT are neither objects of pleasure it's all prostitutes ....

avatarjunior
sent on January 05, 2016 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Frankly I do not understand all this debate (NO ... NO DEBATE!) On this photo.

A draft of Mapplethorpe. A photo useless, that adds nothing to the already seen. A photo which in a few weeks all will be forgotten.


user26730
avatar
sent on January 06, 2016 (16:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'd like to know which is the yardstick to tag a photo as "useless" ???? However, coming from someone who does not even post a photo to put into play to prevent and deal with others ......... dear Nino.ulissi here is of no use just your unfortunate and unhappy comment!
Max

avatarjunior
sent on January 08, 2016 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm not a photographer, I'm an editor and I repeat that in this photo as they are already 'seen hundreds, a more' adds nothing

avatarjunior
sent on March 30, 2017 (20:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Kudos is very elegant!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me