grandfather but once they were really so .................., page 2

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Journalism/Street

grandfather but once they were really so .....................

16.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

vintage cars........... View gallery (19 photos)

grandfather but once they were really so .................. sent on July 30, 2015 (19:43) by Jerry Vacchieri. 25 comments, 1943 views.

at 16mm, 1/250 f/8.0, ISO 200, hand held.

parco del Gran Paradiso lago di ceresole...............

View High Resolution 16.0 MP

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Jerry Vacchieri

sent on August 02, 2015 (8:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Felix the 16-55 f / 2.8 is very good (maybe a little bit bigger) I took exchanging other optical ... but I think the 18-55 f2.8-4 series is just as good ... I do not am one who head the objectives maniacally and not a fan of extraluminose optical eye quality seems good for my esigenze.non are the best person to give a technical opinion as often change brands and equipment for ... if you look at pictures of my galleries you will be able to account for it (money permitting: -D: -D) and I do not get attached to various cameras and lenses. ;-)

a salute Jerry :-P

user62173

sent on August 02, 2015 (8:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm satisfied with both the XT1 is the 18-55,
maybe waiting for Adobe and Fuji put themselves agree to settle the issue in the best development Raw. :-)

I asked you because sooner or later step to 16-55.

Because I will not do often use stabilization 18:55
and against I would not mind at all having those 2mm more on brightness and wide angle f / 2.8 fixed.
Surely it is a little longer and bulky,
but I'm sure he'll be in the same bag where they are now and XT1 18-55 !!! 8-)

Let's say for the onset of autumn would pass.
Then just ... I do not think I'll do another for all annia come !!!

Wonderpig58

sent on August 03, 2015 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Formidable!
Hello
Paul

Alessio Del Frate

sent on August 18, 2015 (20:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful, ottim also the location !!

Jerry Vacchieri

sent on August 22, 2015 (10:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thank you

Paul :-)

Alessio :-)

hello Jerry :-P

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.