What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 19, 2015 (12:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great scatto.wow! Rinaldo Ottimo scatto. Rinaldo |
| sent on November 20, 2015 (0:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for visiting Rinaldo, hello soon. Grazie della visita Rinaldo, ciao a presto. |
user35522 | sent on January 27, 2016 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But the oases are not so ........ these are prisons ...... Ma le oasi non sono così ........ queste sono carceri ...... |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (13:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too bad the pinched with high edge ... but it is still a fantastic first floor and very detailed! Compliments!! Hello ;-) Peccato la pizzicata con il bordo alto... ma rimane comunque un primo piano fantastico e dettagliatissimo! Complimenti!! Ciao |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (14:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Andrea I do not like your head half in half no fire captive the subject is still and does not move if you fail the photo you can try again because photographs at f4 and 100 iso? Mauritius ciao andrea non mi piace la testa mezza a fuoco mezza no in cattività il soggetto sta fermo e non si muove se si sbaglia la foto ci si può riprovare perché fotografare a f4 e 100 iso? maurizio |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (17:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Sepofa, the animal was photographed completely free and could leave if he wanted to, then it would be an endless discussion on methods starting from dogs and cats ........ I have not photographed no animals in cages. @ Joeb in fact the 'I cut so I' l 'original space wow! @ Maurizio I did a little 'of shots from 2.8 to 11, I'm not doing the birds' I played like a girl: -D and tried to highlight the eye, I af 11 shots where everything id fire but I preferred this.
Thank you all for your comments @ Sepofa, l'animale fotografato era completamente libero e poteva andarsene se avesse voluto, poi sui metodi sarebbe una discussione infinita partendo da cani e gatti........non ho fotografato nessun animale nelle gabbie. @ Joeb in effetti l' ho tagliata io cosi' l 'originale ha spazio @ Maurizio ho fatto un po' di scatti da 2,8 a 11, io non facendo avifauna l' ho interpretato come se fosse una ragazza e ho cercato di evidenziare l'occhio, ho gli scatti a f 11 dove ho tutto a fuoco ma ho preferito questa. Grazie a tutti per i commenti |
user35522 | sent on January 27, 2016 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Andrea: It was a falconer? @Andrea: non era di un falconiere ? |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (18:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, they were in open terrain and was placed on top of a pole and flew between 4 or 5 poles in this land, if he wished he could go was not tied, I agree with you on the animals in the cages, in fact I have many animals but no bird can not see them in a cage. All my animals including dogs and cats are free in the ground 24 hours a day. For me maybe a dog race held 23 hours a day in a house is in prison, but the dogs and cats can not say anything or I'll jump on him all at once ;-). Si, erano in un terreno aperto ed era posato in cima a un palo e volava tra 4 o 5 pali in questo terreno, se avesse voluto poteva andare via non era legato, concordo con te sugli animali nelle gabbie, infatti io ho molti animali ma nessun volatile non li posso vedere in gabbia. Tutti i miei animali compreso cane e gatto sono liberi nel terreno 24 ore al giorno. Per me un cane magari da corsa tenuto 23 ore al giorno in un abitazione è in prigione, ma sui cani e i gatti non si può dire nulla se no ti saltano addosso tutti subito . |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok thanks for the explanation :-P maybe it would be nice to see even those with the head all in focus Mauritius ok grazie per la spiegazione magari sarebbe bello vedere anche quelle con la testa tutta a fuoco maurizio |
user35522 | sent on January 27, 2016 (18:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
My intervention was to prevent the reader from what you wrote in the fall misunderstandings deleterious: the oases are something else, man's task in this is to preserve nature as Mom made without altering the same, no cages, falconry, food etc. etc. (Food only in winter) falconry, although it has a value in rare cases, it is a practice violent or animals are born in captivity or trained with laces, in both cases are not free to go wherever they want because they can not hunt (it's like if I brought in a forest of the Amazon and you .. what do you unleashed? go free and starve yourself or come back to me?) is this what you call freedom? you know that what you've photographed is a nocturnal bird of prey? the day sleeping .... That said everyone photographersConsider what he wants and how he wants falconry but are not free ....... Last there is a regulation of the forum and animals photographed in captivity or falconry must be clearly marked as such. Hello Lorenzo Il mio intervento era per evitare che chi legge quanto da te scritto cada in equivoci deleteri: le oasi sono altra cosa, compito dell'uomo in queste è conservare la natura come mamma l'ha fatta senza alterare la stessa, niente gabbie, falconeria, cibo etc. etc. ( cibo solo in inverno ) la falconeria, per quanto abbia una valenza in rari casi, è una pratica violenta: o sono animali nati in cattività o addestrati con lacci, in entrambi i casi non sono liberi di andare dove vogliono perché non sanno cacciare ( è come se ti portassi in una foresta dell'amazzonia e ti liberassi.. che fai ? vai libero e muori di fame o torni da me ? ) è questa quella che tu chiami libertà ? sai che quello che hai fotografato è un rapace notturno ? il giorno dorme.... Detto questo ognuno fotografi quello che vuole e consideri come vuole la falconeria ma non sono liberi....... Ultimo esiste un regolamento del forum e gli animali fotografati in cattività o falconeria devono essere chiaramente segnalati come tali. ciao lorenzo |
| sent on January 27, 2016 (18:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the info, hello Andrea Grazie delle info, ciao Andrea |
| sent on January 28, 2016 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good the maf, detailed and blur. You could leave more space above and desatuarre in a bit given the presence of greenish tint. I remind you that, as stated in the regulations, if the subject was taken up in a controlled environment, or is related to the world of falconry, is point you in the field caption 8-) hello, Lauro Buoni la maf, il dettaglio e lo sfocato. Si poteva lasciare più spazio sopra e desatuarre un pelino data la presenza di dominante verde. Ti ricordo che, come indicato dal regolamento, se il soggetto è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato o è legato al mondo della falconeria, è da indicarlo nel campo didascalia ciao, Lauro |
| sent on January 28, 2016 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lauro thanks for the visit and the details, hello soon Lauro grazie per la visita e le info, ciao a presto |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |