What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a
photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto.
With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
|
|
sent on 16 Settembre 2015 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent in all ... wow! Ottima in tutto... |
|
|
sent on 17 Settembre 2015 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks, Gary! ;-) Grazie, Gaetano! |
|
|
sent on 01 Febbraio 2016 (19:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations, perfect. Complimenti, perfetta. |
|
|
sent on 11 Agosto 2016 (17:51) | This comment has been translated
Nice shot! |
|
|
sent on 11 Agosto 2016 (19:10) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |
|
|
sent on 11 Agosto 2016 (19:54) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
|
|
sent on 11 Agosto 2016 (21:19) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
|
|
sent on 11 Agosto 2016 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The miniatures seem bellina ..
but opening up the huge HD two questions, I am reminded to do to the author, that is:
1) Why a HD so huge that highlights in a disproportionate way the shooting defects (ex. Digital noise)
2) Where is the focus on the subject, always in HD, it does not have the slightest MAF
I hope you will not hold it against me for the script but two flaws that apparent early on.
Greetings Robertino
La miniature sembrerebbe bellina..
ma aprendo l'enorme HD due domande mi sovvengono da fare all'autore e cioè:
1) Perché un HD così enorme che evidenzia in maniera così spropositata i difetti dello scatto (es. rumore digitale)
2) Dov'è la messa a fuoco sul soggetto che, sempre in HD, non presenta la benché minima MAF
Spero tu non me ne voglia per lo scritto ma sono due difetti che saltano immediatamente all'occhio.
Un saluto Robertino
|
|
|
sent on 12 Agosto 2016 (9:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all of the passage.
x Robertino: Thanks for the criticism. I have not delved even how to post the only miniature, comunque..per the first fault, the noise, I think, and I say that with modest equipment in my possession is not possible to do much better without sacrificing detail. Especially with little light as in this case.
For maf, the eye will not be perfect, but everything else does not seem blurry. perhaps not clear, for the noise above.
Ps: I saw your beautiful photos and I hope one day of power even bring their precision and cleanliness. :-P
Greetings! Grazie a tutti del passaggio.
x Robertino: Grazie per le critiche. Non ho approfondito ancora come postare la sola miniatura, comunque..per il primo difetto, quello del rumore, credo e dico credo, che con la modesta attrezzatura in mio possesso non sia possibile fare meglio senza sacrificare tanto dettaglio. Soprattutto con poca luce come in questo caso.
Per la maf, non sarà perfetto l'occhio, ma tutto il resto non mi sembra sfocato. Non nitido forse, per il rumore di cui sopra.
Ps: Ho visto le tue belle foto e spero un giorno di potere anche solo avvicinare la loro precisione e pulizia. 
Saluti! |
|
|
sent on 12 Agosto 2016 (14:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Rule number one: the eye must be in focus. Everything else can be discussed ... Regola numero uno: l'occhio deve essere a fuoco. Su tutto il resto si può discutere... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
15.9 MEGAPIXEL
