What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a
photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto.
With more than 259000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
|
|
sent on 06 Aprile 2012 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Irruenteee! ... But if as I imagine you have taken during the day ... because 400 iso? Irruenteee!!!...ma se come immagino l'hai scattata di giorno...perchè 400 iso? |
|
|
sent on 07 Aprile 2012 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella, you finally see a picture with turbulent waters!
I do not like the silky water, makes it all too muffled.
Hello, congratulations Bella, finalmente si vede una foto con acque tumultuose!
Neanche a me piace l'acqua setosa, rende tutto troppo ovattato.
Ciao, complimenti |
|
|
sent on 07 Aprile 2012 (19:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Will .. I always use the lowest ISO to 100 (of course if there is no light) ....
For me it is only a matter of short time .. (?)
PS I also fascinating waters silky ... evoke images and different suggestions .. as opposed to rushing water. ..sarà che io uso gli iso sempre bassi a 100 (naturalmente se c'è luce)....
Per me è solo questione di tempi ridotti..(??)
P.S. trovo affascinanti anche le acque setose...evocano immagini e suggestioni diverse..in contrapposizione dell'acqua impetuosa. |
|
|
sent on 06 Maggio 2012 (17:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice effect that iso or iso! good ;-) che bell'effetto iso o non iso!!ottima |
|
|
sent on 08 Maggio 2012 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Do you know what's happening to me?
Guess the photo even before you take it, then I try to set the machine for the shot and start to click, but in all cases the result almost never satisfy me, I think I still do a lot of exercise ....
:-P noise I see really obvious cmq thanks! Sai cosa mi sta succedendo?
Immagino la foto prima ancora di averla scattata, poi provo a impostare la macchina per lo scatto e inizio a cliccare, ma in tutti i casi il risultato quasi mai mi soddisfa, credo che devo fare ancora molto esercizio....
 il rumore lo vedo davvero evidente cmq grazie ! |
|
|
sent on 13 Maggio 2012 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
probably the 1000D at 400 iso 'already' problems 'noise'
I'm here to point you could dare to ISO 100, or 4.5 f.3.5 and the shutter speed.
hello and good photos
free probabilmente la 1000D a 400 iso da' gia' problemi di "rumore"
a sto punto qui potevi osare ISO 100, f.3.5 o 4.5 e stesso tempo di scatto.
ciao e buone foto
franco |
|
|
sent on 28 Giugno 2012 (8:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it because for this type of subject or the silky blur would not have the same performance ... maybe stay with that lens f5.6-f6.3 around would give the same effect at lower ISO. In the end you would have taken at ISO 200 with more or less the same time. But for the diaphragm, not knowing how far away you were, I do not know if the depth of field would be sufficient.
Unusual and beautiful because then the noise is removed with DPP, just fiddling around 'with the parameters not to make too plasticky the photos (unfortunately I know about):-D
Mi piace perchè per questo tipo di soggetto la setosità o il mosso non avrebbero avuto la stessa resa... con quella lente forse rimanere intorno a f5.6-f6.3 avrebbe dato lo stesso effetto ad iso più bassi. A conti fatti avresti scattato a iso 200 più o meno con lo stesso tempo. Però per quel diaframma, non conoscendo a che distanza ti trovavi, non so se la profondità di campo sarebbe stata sufficiente.
Bella perchè inusuale e poi il rumore si toglie anche con DPP, basta giocherellare un po' con i parametri per non rendere troppo plasticosa la foto (purtroppo ne so qualcosa) 
|
|
|
sent on 15 Novembre 2017 (18:06) | This comment has been translated
Nice shot! |
|
|
sent on 15 Novembre 2017 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it, congratulations! Mi piace, complimenti! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
