RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Kingfisher

 
Kingfisher...

Uccelli

View gallery (6 photos)

Kingfisher sent on March 15, 2012 (22:16) by Antonio_1982. 23 comments, 2435 views.

1/2000 f/5.6, ISO 1600, Specie: Alcedo atthis


3 persons like it: Giorgio C., Paoloemilio Nicola, Runner


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user181
avatar
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice pose, shame about the head and eye shadow all in all a nice picture that could be better, but maybe next time ... ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The shadow was ... the alternative was not to take ...
Hello

user181
avatar
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The shadow was ... the alternative was not to take ...
Hello


I understand that, but if he had his head down would come better, that's all! Sooner or later you'll necessarily with the head properly exposed! :-)

avatarsupporter
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Sarah! add that with the command Shadow / lights PS you can improve.

avatarsenior
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

great compliments

avatarjunior
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarsupporter
sent on March 19, 2012 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

And 'generally recognized that direct sunlight is too harsh and it is difficult to domabile. It was more at the time of the film but also the sensors fail to register well both high lights that low. I tried to ritoccartela to see to improve it a little ... certain that the light was really hard. To be your first martin you were really good!



avatarjunior
sent on March 19, 2012 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarsupporter
sent on March 19, 2012 (22:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sometimes deepen and point out the flaws that you see does nothing but good author who urges us to do even better. I do not know, why do not you describe how you have taken, but also known a little slurred. A tripod is always recommended as well as a necessary correction in PP when resizing for the web is like the oil in the lumen sharpness. Here I have limited myself to correct a little bit the gap between light and shadow, and to decrease the saturation a bit part is because I saw too.

avatarsupporter
sent on March 19, 2012 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It should really be a problem resizing the detail a little mixed because I told you I tried to touch up again going to look for the hidden with a bit of sharpness MDC .... Judge for yourself!



avatarsenior
sent on March 19, 2012 (22:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The first is the first Martino Martino. Bravo for catching ... the quality is ... Although already shooting Rubacolor make another picture. Hello ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on March 19, 2012 (22:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarjunior
sent on March 19, 2012 (23:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

not bad!

avatarsenior
sent on March 19, 2012 (23:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I would say a good catch, the first is never forgotten .... and then comes the martinite .....
after surgery, and of course shooting migliorat, moreover, even if not as large alchemy gave us hands Rubacolor mica Kimera69 .....
by the next will be even more beautiful,
at room temperature've got too much,
now wait for the next.

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2012 (7:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Antonio: I do not believe he's a wizard on the PC. I only know a few basic steps to treat an image that is already well exposed because right (the wrong ones to fix the trash). So I would not know which program to advise the PP. However, everyone should have the control of the sharpen and that's where you have to act when you have resized to 1200px. There should then be a'' command'' but save for web ... repeat are not practical programs ritocco.Ricrdati then that, in general objectives at full aperture, in addition to having a reduced PDC also have a lower optical yield to other diaphragms up to f16

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2012 (10:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

installs ps and the world will change ... to be the first is too good, I close the aperture more, always, all the rest is ps, the rest when the subject is in focus and properly exposed there is not much more to , if you do not pull out a bit of detail from the raw which is very latent departure for the inability of the photographer but by nature of the drive and format. Hello

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2012 (13:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How true! Mimulinai!

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2012 (14:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The image is improved but still very nice compliments.

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2012 (15:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2012 (16:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

After all these comments very interesting good and you'll see that the next one will be even more enjoyable


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me