JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies Customize Refuse Cookies
RCE Foto






Login Logout Join JuzaPhoto!


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Astrophotography
  4. » large floor - Castelluccio of Norcia - Milky Way
 
large floor - Castelluccio of Norcia - Milky Way

Paesaggi : Castelluccio di Norcia

View gallery (5 photos)

large floor - Castelluccio of Norcia - Milky Way sent on 27 Febbraio 2012 (17:21) by Pasquale Giovine. 12 comments, 1899 views.

at 18mm, 15 sec f/3.5, ISO 3200, tripod. Castelluccio di Norcia, Italy.

pian grande - castelluccio di norcia - via lattea - Canon eos 550d, canon ef/s 18 55 is, 15" f3.5, iso 3200, treppiede #NightPhotos #Notturno






What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2012 (14:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

nice but you would probably have lessened the iso (and noise) to increase the shutter speed because if you shot at 18 you still had a few seconds ...

avatarjunior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2012 (16:28)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


ho fatto altre prove infatti, ma a 25 o 30 secondi era molto evidente il "mosso" , grazie del consiglio comunque Sorriso    


avatarsenior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2012 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

you should have 32 seconds .......
you pass the formula, errors, to calculate the time safeguards to prevent the blur of the stars
3000:1,6: FOCAL USED: 3.16

avatarjunior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2012 (19:09)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


grazie per la formula, la prossima occasione che mi capita la utilizzerò a dovere!    


avatarsenior
sent on 28 Febbraio 2012 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

imagine, it is not mine. and 'a member of the forum but I do not remember who had developed ....

user684
avatar
sent on 29 Febbraio 2012 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

I remember 550/mm focal used and should avre the maximum time for pinpoint stars

avatarjunior
sent on 29 Febbraio 2012 (19:31)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


una dice 32 l'altra 30 secondi...alla fine non cambierebbe quasi nulla, credo che oltre i 25 30 secondi vedendo una foto con angolo lungo di 1200p si noti il mosso, inoltre in questa foto avevo il problema luce, perchè il sole era tramontato da poco più di un ora...avendo fatto anche altre prove, credo che questa con questi tempi/ISO sia quella uscita meglio...sarà per la prossima foto! Sorriso    


avatarjunior
sent on 05 Marzo 2012 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

and 'may be slightly out of focus? you decide how to focus when you are at night?

avatarjunior
sent on 05 Marzo 2012 (19:51)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


credo sia impossibile. è a fuoco, però ho dovuto mettere un po di noise red. .. la messa a fuoco è su infinito, cioè a infinito il 18 55 non ha a fuoco un bel niente :) quindi ho messo a fuoco le luci di castelluccio che distavano da me diversi km, considera che dopo 10 mt, in genere è tutto a fuoco, almeno con un 18mm    


avatarjunior
sent on 07 Marzo 2012 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

Coprolog here it is, if you put 18mm to 3.5 you will see that the hyperfocal distance with a 550d (T2i) is 5.09 meters
www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on 08 Marzo 2012 (18:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

thanks for the site

avatarjunior
sent on 08 Marzo 2012 (19:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)    

than nothing ;)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me