What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 18, 2024 (16:29) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (16:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
When I enter this gallery I can't help but look back at the ones made with the SL3 :-o Quando entro in questa galleria non posso fare a meno di riguardare quelle fatte con la SL3  |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (17:10) | This comment has been translated
Very nice portrait |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (17:38) | This comment has been translated
Excellent portrait, congratulations! |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (18:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Decidedly undigital image, really remarkable. Immagine decisamente poco digitale, davvero notevole. |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of the three, it's the one I prefer.
Delle tre è quella che preferisco
Bellissimo sguardo
Ciao, Renato |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (19:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Amazing
Sharpness Beautiful
Mat Incredibile nitidezza
Bellissima
Mat |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (20:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A blur that to call terrible is to pay him a compliment... Uno sfocato che definire terribile è fargli un complimento... |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (21:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Btiziano91 how I understand you.
What a top camera! Btiziano91 come ti capisco.
Che fotocamera top! |
| sent on June 18, 2024 (23:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This is also thanks to the optics. Il merito è anche dell'ottica. |
| sent on June 19, 2024 (0:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Stunning portrait with stunning selective MaF.
Greetings.
Nicholas Splendido ritratto con una straordinaria MaF selettiva.
Un saluto.
Nicola |
| sent on June 19, 2024 (5:25) | This comment has been translated
Fantastic! |
| sent on June 19, 2024 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fantastic photo, but it just seems to me that the eye is not perfectly in focus?! In focus they seem to me to be the eyelashes foto fantastica, ma sembra solo a me che l'occhio non sia perfettamente a fuoco?! a fuoco mi sembrano le ciglia |
| sent on June 20, 2024 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm a beginner, I admit, so I'd like to understand why you all say it's a great photo... As far as I know of technique, shooting at 1.2 was not indicated here since the left eye is not in focus. Also the light seems very bad to me, it should have been diffused better, or I think you could have shot by closing the aperture a little (or lowering the ISO if the 1.2 was really necessary) also to reduce the amount of light and then recover the shadows in post, or simply you could have done a better post-production... As it stands, the histogram should show clipping in the white area, because the exposure is incorrect... Or at least that's what I think. I'm eager to learn, you tell me Sono un principiante, lo ammetto, per cui vorrei capire perché dite tutti che è una bella foto... Da quel che so di tecnica qui non era indicato scattare a 1.2 visto che l'occhio a sinistra non è a fuoco. Inoltre la luce mi pare pessima, andava diffusa meglio, o credo si potesse scattare chiudendo un po' il diaframma (o abbassando gli ISO se l'1.2 era proprio necessario) anche per ridurre la quantità di luce e poi recuperare le ombre in post, o semplicemente si poteva fare una miglior post-produzione... così com'è l'istogramma dovrebbe mostrare del clipping nella zona del bianco, perché l'esposizione non è corretta... O almeno è quel che credo. Sono ansioso di imparare, ditemi voi |
| sent on December 07, 2024 (22:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To be able to open the diaphragm so wide, how far away do you stand from the subject? Per poter aprire così tanto il diaframma a che distanza ci si pone dal soggetto? |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
