RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Marco Persoglia
www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcoPersoglia



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Marco Persoglia


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_efs24stmCanon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM

Pros: Pocket, economic, sharpness, minimum focus distance

Cons: Difficult to change the lens with gloves, hood as an option to be purchased separately

Opinion: I took it as the only alternative to the Sigma 24 1.8 I need for macros acclimatized, I chose not to peck at the Canon Sigma defective. And 'unbeatable in APS-C unfortunately FF Canon EF-40 STM can not compete with Canon EF-S 24 STM seen the minimum distances setup fuoco.rnSul price, very convenient to buy it from the physical store because the product purchased online spending Shipping costs as a new store in the physical. It is not easy to change the lens with winter gloves due to their small size, so you risk to turn the focus.

sent on October 25, 2015


sony_rx100_ivSony RX100 IV

Pros: Compact, pocket-sized, bright optical, electronic viewfinder, flash, excellent image quality and video

Cons: Lacks the touchscreen, poor macro, serving a memory card for high-performance video capabilities, reduced battery capacity, lacks the external charger, instruction book paper not supplied, price

Opinion: I chose as a compact alternative to the SLR, I often find myself in situations where I can not bring SLR such as mountain hiking, walking in the city, sport, even if too little etc..rnIl sensor gave me the number of satisfactions, the image quality is comparable to the camera that allows a large recovery in highlights and shadows without compromising qualità.rnNon provides the most detailed instruction manual but can be downloaded from the internet and save on your smartphone, I wanted the printed manual from browse and study like the libro.rnE 'true that Sony RX-100 IV sucks your battery is essential to buy the external charger and an extra battery at 18 euro on Amazon. rnFate attention on the choice of an SD memory card, the recording of 4K video requires an SDXC 64GB and higher and the speed of Class 10 and Class 3 is required to speed UHS 3 to record up to 100 Mbps.

sent on September 27, 2015


manfrotto_410Manfrotto 410

Pros: solidity, very precise adjustments to the rack, perfect in macro

Cons: bulky, heavy, ill-suited for lightweight tripods

Opinion: Using Manfrotto 410 for photographing mainly macro, I was surprised, amazed by its robustness and practicality of correct shots to strong ingrandimenti.rnE 'built in a sturdy gear box to allow you to make adjustments of 3 movements: rotation, front tilt , tilt laterale.rnOgni position has two knobs that allow you to make adjustments and micrometer rapidi.rnDurante the first steps of using Manfrotto 410 can be complicated to use, find the perfect shot, but do not worry it takes a little practice. rnrnCosta about 200 euro, I highly recommend it for those who want to challenge themselves with the macro more thrust. Mount the plate type 410PL quick, the head has a lever for the quick attachment of the plate, another small lock lever.

sent on August 11, 2014


canon_100-400Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM

Pros: Autofocus, weight, size, versatility, optical quality, best tele-zoom in circulation

Cons: Dated and lack of tropicalization

Opinion: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM zoom is the only offer portability, optical quality and unrivaled 400mm. The 100-300mm and 400mm reach excellent sharpness lose a little, but it is still quite good, even in large printed dimensioni.rnTutto the merit of the exceptional relationship between weight / quality that ensures hiking in the mountains without difficulty, its compactness weight of 100-400 and allowed me to seize all the photographic opportunities in which I can not do that with the Canon EF 500mm f / 4 L IS USM.rnLa construction is good, however, the pump system is not very pleasant but over of the time you get used to it. Production since 1997, which is the lens dated sin, a price to pay for the stabilizer of the old generation and the lack of tropicalizzazione.rnAssolutamente recommended!

sent on December 18, 2011


sigma_1-4xSigma 1.4x EX DG

Pros: Compact, price

Cons: Lack of tropicalization

Opinion: I took the multiplier Sigma 1.4x EX DG to mount on both Sigma and Canon lenses. I've often used with Canon EF 500mm f / 4 L IS USM to get to 700mm, I compared it with the Canon EF 1.4x II provided by a friend, to my surprise I noticed that the photos remain substantially the same as sharpness. If you are looking for an excellent low price multiplier giving the tropicalization, Sigma 1.4x EX DG for you!

sent on October 01, 2011


canon_500_f4isCanon EF 500mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: Construction, capacity, comes easily in your hand luggage

Cons: Hood bulky, price

Opinion: Manageability freehand is pretty good even if the photographer is robust and able to do so. The building is at the top: solid as a rock. The temptation to multiply I think it's strong enough. Thanks to f / 4, you can multiply Canon EF 500mm f / 4 L IS USM with 1, 4x, which becomes a 700mm on APS-C in both cases retains the AF without any problems, great for birds particularly effective to capture distant subjects, small and elusive. It 'a very good supertele travel, you had no trouble bring your Canon EF 500mm f / 4 L IS USM as hand luggage or trolley.

sent on October 01, 2011


canon_24-105Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, versatility

Cons: Flare, poor macro, wide angle just in APS-C

Opinion: E 'an excellent all-rounder, is not bright considering the presence of an excellent stabilizer. I use it often use it directly mounted on APS-C and has always been my faithful travel companion. Canon EF 24-105mm f / 4 L IS USM has a quality? superb build and is weather sealed. The flare is the Achilles heel of the Canon EF 24-105mm f / 4 L IS USM, so be very careful, it reduces the battery life often using the LCD screen to check after each shot and take the picture again.

sent on October 01, 2011


tamron_60macroTamron SP 60mm f/2 Di II LD Macro

Pros: Construction very good, very nice design, AF internal price

Cons: Soft wide open, specifically for APS-C

Opinion: I chose this lens with the golden ring as a competitor of that just lacks micro Nikkor 60 house in Canon (EF-S 60 did not convince me). It 's my first Tamron lens, I must say I was not disappointed. I use it to make the macro a little more extreme, it is giving me good satisfaction and then still easily manageable by hand. The problem of filming with a 1:1 magnification ratio in most of the situations that require the use of a tripod. At full aperture f/2.0 is soft and when used for portraits leads to bohek unpleasant. The AF is fast enough and quiet. There is an error on the feature table above shows that the lens does not have the Full Time MF, confirm that the lens has Full Time MF and allows for manual focus in AF mode.

sent on September 29, 2011


canon_7dCanon 7D

Pros: AF, construction, operation speed, ergonomics, optical viewfinder, support UDMA, wireless flash control, video

Cons: Tropicalization not very strong, high quality with ISO not great, missing the lock button ring

Opinion: I have the 7D for about a year with satisfaction. The construction and ergonomics are at the top but I would have preferred a tropicalization robust. A perfect machine that anyone who loves wildlife, sport all about fast autofocus, high-performance and gust up to 8 frames per second. In my opinion is one of the 7D SLR market more complicated due to the sensor too thick. The RAW files at high ISO are not exceptional, they often require an experienced photographer working in Photoshop.

sent on September 04, 2011


canon_40dCanon 40D

Pros: Good burst, excellent 10.1 megapixel RAW well workable

Cons: AF little customizable, low-resolution display, does not support UDMA

Opinion: I put it in the drawer waiting to find a buyer since I bought the 7D. I have never been separated from the 40D, the 40D produces files that are better and easy to work without having to work hard on PP. The screen is low resolution, it lacks the fine correction of FA does not accept memory cards UDMA ... is for these reasons that many photographers have preferred to competition Nikon D300.

sent on July 07, 2011




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me