in arrivo la nuova fujifilm x-s20… varrà la pena l'upgrade dalla x-s10?

“
Il problema di Fuji comunque rimangono gli zoom che sono tendenzialmente vecchi. „

“ Sulla qualità molte lenti fuji sonos tate progettate per sensori da 16mpx e non rendono bene con i nuovi sensori da 40 mpx e nemmeno rendevano tanto bene con quello da 26 mpx. „

“ il 16-55 è ottimo (lato corto) ma con dimensioni e peso oramai non più attuali. „

“ Anticipo subito che se non sei d'accordo e gli zoom fuji per te vanno bene così non ho intenzione di polemizzare a ognuno le sue opioni. „

“ Much more problems you encounter when it comes to RAW files. The results are so high that it is obvious the constructors depended mainly on the software of the camera to correct the geometrical deformations of the lens. At 16 mm focal length the distortion reaches a huge level of ?5.59%. Fortunately it decreases very quickly with the increase of the focal length and at 23 mm it is just ?1.13%. Then it changes the sign immediately and already at 35 mm you deal with distinct pincushion deformations of +1.91%. Still it is only a prelude to the results you get at the maximum focal length where the “pincushion” increases to +3.07%.

The chart below shows clearly how unfavourably the Fujinon compares with its rivals in this category. Only the Sony keeps its company as it also had a high distortion level at the wide angle and, additionally, it was of the troublesome moustache variation. Still the Sony corrected that aberration better at the bigger focal lengths and the Fujinon didn't even try. Anyway a result of +3,07% is one of the highest pincushion distortion levels we've seen so far in our tests. „

“
Miky00 guarda che anche il 16-55 fuji è fortemente corretto „