|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Guglia72 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Guglia72  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R Pros: IQ, size and weight Cons: AF: Slow, noisy and inaccurate in low light, minimum high fire distance Opinion: The first thing that struck me, just pulled out of the box, is its weight that I imagined well higher. Mounted on my X-T2 immediately manifested its perhaps only negative aspect: the AF. It is particularly noisy and not too precise, especially in low light situations, rather slow and, evidently, old school (i.e. old tech). Too bad because the lens, which does not cost very little, then literally leaves you speechless for the quality of image it makes and for its now famous bokeh. Well balanced as size and weight, comfortable the wide dialing dial, as well as the diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm, is definitely a lens to promote even if it loses the praise because of the AF. Another small flaw is the excessive minimum focus distance. Perhaps a Mark II version could remedy these small gaps and bring a truly perfect lens to market (and in our bags). sent on December 04, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Aesthetics, price, file quality, ergonomics, colors, Fuji goals Cons: For now, no one Opinion: After falling in love with Fuji with an X100S, I sold all my Canon kit to take the X-T2, I was long undecided whether to take this or the X-T3, or an X-T20/30, but then, thanks to a very affordable price - even considering that it has been a long time coming Ita the X-T3 - I opted for the X-T2. In addition to the affordable price, I was convinced that the X-T2 files work perfectly with Lr6, not forcing me to a subscription with Adobe. The machine is beautiful, like all the other Fuji, certainly not a feather weight but comparable to the entry levels Canon (almost identical to my old 760D), but with a much higher quality and characteristics; excellent ergonomics, especially when compared to the X100 series, which are a bit small for my hands. Many customizable keys and the dials available. The strength of the Fuji system are definitely the files (especially the JPg SOOC) and the goals, all of a truly exceptional quality, although then the price goes up a little: forget the Canon goals from 100 euros or a little more (I think the excellent 50STM or 24STM) , but expect a quality comparable to Canon's L-series. I mean, i think the X-T2 is still a machine that I would recommend. sent on September 01, 2019 |
 | Canon 760D Pros: Lightweight and with a good grip, Excellent AF, Second ring and secondary display despite being an entry level, Excellent image quality at low ISO, Excellent wi-fi Cons: Noise from 1600 ISO, in movies the microphone records the sound of the AF (even with STM lenses), Battery life is not excellent, especially with live view activated, RAW + JPG saved fairly slow Opinion: I have long been undecided between the 70D and 760D to replace the beautiful 400D, and in the end I opted for the small 760D. Small, but with all the credentials to compete with even the biggest machines. perhaps because I do not have great ambitions (or ability) as a photographer, or perhaps because I can still be content, but I must say that the 760D is a great car. If you are aware of the limits (pentaspecchio in the first place) you will certainly be able to enjoy the advantages compared to the older sisters (reduced weight) .rnBut to be honest, it took me some time to find the feeling with this machine, perhaps too complex and full of options for those, like me, was used to the Spartan 400D. But just a little patience and practice and you find yourself with a machine perfectly adapted to your needs and always ready to wonderful shots (within the limits of the photographer's ability, of course) .rnBuilt with the 24 STM, now almost perpetually mounted on the 760D , diveborn a faithful companion for every trip, light exit, ride in motion, urban walk ... in short, for practically all occasions when weight becomes a factor that would make you leave the equipment at home. sent on January 26, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: weight, performance / price ratio, size, brightness, for FF and aps-c Cons: being a STM lens difficulty with the MF Opinion: It costs a little, weighs little, cluttered little, is bright, has a good image quality, on aps-c has a beautiful focal length (in fixed torque with 24 STM), on FF is the focal length par excellence. I think it's hard to find reasons why not buy this lens, unless you have needs (and availability) that can be met by an L series lens, but that's a whole other league! For those with more human needs, this lens is truly exceptional. And if you really regret the purchase, however, the investment has been minimal and the resale of the used is very high. sent on December 23, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: size and weight, price, IQ, focal length, aperture Cons: like all STMs difficult to use in MF, just aps-c Opinion: A fantastic lens, versatile, practically invisible (it does not weigh anything, it does not protrude from the body), plus it has an excellent opening, a fantastic focal, a fast AF. In short, the ideal lens for 90% of my photos, and that now remains virtually always glued to the body, except to leave room occasionally to the legendary 50ino. 24 + 50 is the winning combination also for traveling light and having 2 focal lengths (always on aps-c) that cover practically 100% of my needs. sent on December 23, 2017 |
 | Huawei P8 Lite (2017) Pros: Price, performance, battery life, Emui, dimensions, fast charge, only 16Gb version Cons: Camera, sharing slot for dual sim and memory card Opinion: Great cell phone with a quality / price ratio really among the best on the market. The excellent hardware makes it excellent for use even a little 'smaliziato (I do not express myself on the games because I do not use). Excellent customization Huawei (Emui 5.0.1) and excellent as always the operating system Android came to version 7.0. The battery lasts a lot, after a day of use "unscrupulous" will arrive safely in the evening with a good remaining charge.rnDa definitely improve the camera that returns very few files, but it is not a phone that you buy for that. The sensor impression is excellent but sometimes, especially with the hands a bit 'wet, does not recognize the fingerprints; nothing transcendental, but definitely worth mentioning. Another limit, perhaps this time more important, is the availability of only the 16Gb version. For storage memory there is a slot for an external memory card that shares with the slot of the second sim: thereforeyou have to choose between a second sim or more storage memory.rnAh I forgot, the whole part of the phone is manual (it takes almost everywhere), while for the data connection we are limited in 4G to 150 Mbps and the wifi has only one band at 2.4 GHz. Even here nothing transcendental, especially for the price range. sent on December 05, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: quality / price ratio, AF, weight and size, stabilizer Cons: Plastic Attack, lens hood is not included in the package Opinion: I bought this lens as a joke, pushed higher by the very low price (and cashback from Canon) that from my real need. Today I am particularly glad I bought it. The lens performs very well in all situations, and has focal hike would call generous; its value is definitely higher than its price. The stabilizer works wonders and the AF is excellent, in line with the latest Canon series STM objectives. Feather weight and compact dimensions complete the picture absolutely positivo.rnConsidero this lens by making a purchase regardless of the real needs, but at the right time we will be happy to have in your bag and give us beautiful shots. sent on February 28, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
