|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Estroverzia www.juzaphoto.com/p/Estroverzia  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 6D Pros: Value 'SENSOR / UNBEATABLE PRICE - Cons: NO JOYSTICK - SLOT MEMORY - SIGHT - FOCUS - METER DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND - KEY PDC unusable - MANY THEY BOUGHT STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT IN ADDITION TO MAKE HIS SENSOR "PHOTO" THEIR SHOTS Opinion: Before this camera had a 1D mark II, and was looking for the 1Ds Mark III, but are not able to find at reasonable prices (in my area) .rnTralascio to speak of the qualities of the sensor, which everyone knows to be on top, behind only the 1Dx home Canon, iso held very high, excellent cleaning image during long exposures. Good also the white balance automatically, marginal function for raw, but I stress that does not shoot at random as other cameras; different view however the exposure, which is why I started using all the settings in the manual (I had already begun with the 1d, actually) .rnPer can keep the price low, Canon has made some compromises: the viewfinder is not really suitable steps a 35 mm, pass the lateral points of 'af which are quite useless, moreover is not designed for the action, and the central works fine; but the memory slot is disturbing, both for construction and for the absence of the double slot, a semipro must have, exhaustive! Terrifying is also the pad / wheel to movepoints maf, unusable. rnAvrei much preferred slot and joy of 5D3, or a tiltable viewfinder, instead of wifi (one of the most useless things that are mounting cameras) and GPS, is useful, if not drank battery as a dodge charger.rnI problems found that all the construction / tropicalization, for now, after the desert, rain, snow, I found none, the question also user's attention ..... rnMacchina to take if you want one offering, or a full frame sensor ISO 6400 for use (I use it without hesitation even at 12000), using glass series L superbright, if you want to feel, speed, accuracy, eternity, the council 1Ds 3.rnPresa with approximately 1600 shots in assets, warranty remaining three years and half amateur photographer, to 1200 € sull'unghia.rnrn sent on December 23, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 391 RC2 Pros: Well built by counting the very low price. Cons: the z-axis (the vertical / horizontal plate) is a bit 'mushy, or hard to shake, take your pick - a bit' pesantuccia and little 'awkward when you want to be fast and lightweight, but it is a 3-head movements, so ... Opinion: It 's the head that I use currently, with me for 3 years, and has suffered from beatings on the rocks all over Europe, but it still works perfectly except for the scratches. The z-axis of the plate, it locks very easily, if you pressure tends to loosen, and for vertical shots where you need maximum alignment, you have to lose a bit 'of time to fix it for good. 3 rnEssendo movement is awkward because, in fact, we have 3 axes (to be adjusted as opposed to a sphere that are immediate, more is added to the quick release plate that if appoggiaste the tripod on my shoulder, I remember everything that falls :) . rnUna ball is the most comfortable and lightweight for strictly landscape, panoramic anything though, and I'm looking for a down to tile. rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn sent on September 05, 2014 |
 | Canon 1D Mark II Pros: CONSTRUCTION AND ERGONOMICS FOR SERIES 1 - GUST - FOCUS - NOW BECOME THE ECONOMY - ALL SUBSTANCE Cons: FEW MEGAPIXEL - ISO GOOD ONLY UP TO 800 - TINY DISPLAY - SETTING BUTTON CONFIGURATION OF DIFFICULT Opinion: All the cons listed, are in line with the cameras of the time, only the sister 1ds mk2 had 16 good megapixels and ISO up to 1600, in fact it is a super car! But in Working status with today's generation, in some circumstances it may make people feel. the buttons have the configuration that then canon intelligent thought, or to press 2 buttons simultaneously to enter the function, x prevent accidental clicks, less evil then they abandoned DrnComunque, if you need a machine gun economic, to accompany your ff, sec me is the ideal gust still at the top, and excellent af. To genres where it is needed most image quality, it is recommended that the sister of this generation, or the 1ds mk2 with its 16 MPs (ditto if you often crop or prints), but cmq, the virtually non-existent at low ISO noise filter, leaves much detail x an excellent recovery in ps, with the noise that is more like a film grain, although a bit dirty 'is not annoying. rnC'è then to consider that is a 1D, with tutto what follows from it: although dated, you have to hand you a professional, and you'll never want to go back perhaps even to a semipro: D I'm in love for example the lever behind the viewfinder x plug the eye, nothing more than a rubber stopper on the shoulder!! rnPer now I keep it, I have to go to Ireland in January, I need his seal watertight hehe then I'll change to a 1DS mk3 probably rnCONSIGLIATA .... ;-) sent on November 02, 2013 |
 | Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Pros: Versatility - A variation always come out with one goal Cons: Pitch dark in many situations, the great stabilizer does not work miracles - up from 200 the image quality becomes a mirage Opinion: When I took it seemed like a good choice, in hindsight ... is convenient because it allowed me many times to go out without purse, and switch to a landscape, to shoot a bird on a tree in 1 second, but the compromises are many: it is bright, with little light in my hand is almost always been impossible to take pictures freehand, l is is great, in my hand (very firm) compensates for 3 stops, but does not do miracles. The focus is lentina, but acceptable condition No normal, low-light and moving subjects (in particular the focal length of 200-270) is ... I would say eccentric ... because you never know who will combine. Until around 150 mm overall image quality (sharpness, vignettaura, distortion, the difference between corner and center, c) is more acceptable and less homogeneous, more and better standard of classical canon 18-55 etc. .... but above this focal the edges are impastatissimi, and dark, and also in the center, there is not much detail. IN CONCLUSION my first picture I made with him, but I do notadvice, take 2 lenses if you want a hike so great, canon 15-85 and 70-200 f4 if you want long distances, canon 10-22 and 24-105 if you love landscapes and reportage, or cm ², avoid long trips. sent on October 09, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Pros: zoom extremely light - price Cons: lack of sharpness - oxen Opinion: was in the kit with my first car, and honestly it was better if I took the only body on the web, rather than in the store. From the very beginning I did not like this lens, 55 mm in too short a zoom, not bright, 18 distorts and in the corners is not clear. If you want to st economic objectives x to start taking photos, we sincerely recommend a tamron or an old canon used, however, aim to war parties from friends, such as those on the beach is great! Far more than the 50 1.8 that many use to st purpose. sent on September 29, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: lightness - image quality - price Cons: absolutely none Opinion: I tried this lens a day on the streets of Florence, so I can not say too much, but certainly won me over, it will be my prox purchase. rnPreso in hand, turned out to be lighter than I thought, and the construction, size and nuts you do fall in the hand very well. The focus is fast and precise, perfect. The images are razor-sharp, even at the corners. I have not seen any particular decay, light and performance along the edges, both at 70 and 200. the price also makes it even more magnifico.E 'strange to see so much quality at such a low price (on ebay is located at 540 €) .... I can not help but recommend it! sent on September 28, 2013 |
 | Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Pros: Versatility - A variation always come out with one goal Cons: Pitch dark in many situations, the great stabilizer does not work miracles - up from 200 the image quality becomes a mirage Opinion: When I took it seemed like a good choice, in hindsight ... is convenient because it allowed me many times to go out without purse, and switch to a landscape, to shoot a bird on a tree in 1 second, but the compromises are many: it is bright, with little light in my hand is almost always been impossible to take pictures freehand, l is is great, in my hand (very firm) compensates for 3 stops, but does not do miracles. The focus is lentina, but acceptable condition No normal, low-light and moving subjects (in particular the focal length of 200-270) is ... I would say eccentric ... because you never know who will combine. Until around 150 mm overall image quality (sharpness, vignettaura, distortion, the difference between corner and center, c) is more acceptable and less homogeneous, more and better standard of classical canon 18-55 etc. .... but above this focal the edges are impastatissimi, and dark, and also in the center, there is not much dettaglio.rnIN CONCLUSION my first picture I made with him, but I would not lor advice, take 2 lenses if you want a hike so great, canon 15-85 and 70-200 f4 if you want long distances, canon 10-22 and 24-105 if you love landscapes and reportage, or cm ², avoid long trips. sent on September 13, 2013 |
 | Canon 500D Pros: Dimensions and Weight - Value for money Cons: For me only the high iso, 1600 and 3200, not so satisfactory, but cmq in line with other ASPC, and the exposure that sometimes no guesses at all. Opinion: My first camera, at the time had just come out, and I was convinced of her thanks to the size contenutissime, and the sensor shared with the 7d. A great car, if combined with good lenses, you can do any kind photographic image quality with excellent results. I compared APSC outputs later, as the 600d and 60d, honestly I have not seen differences, try that now all the APSC also are excellent entry level machines. He has a problem logically, also involving the strip market is dv, which are the focus, side steps I have never given security and in fact nn never use them, use the center cross, that I was disappointed only a few times (the kind my photographic help me, landscapes street portraits reportage architecture), and the ISO, the sensor fault also reduced, in 1600, the noise will always be present, it bothers me because I do a lot of night photos and high ISO are obliged to use them but peace. In my opinion also the reading skills of the exposure automatically, as well as the white, leave much to be desired, but interventionendo manually risolve.rnIN CONCLUSION I like it and I was disappointed a few times, I am aware of its limits, but I would consigliarvela only if you find it at a good price, otherwise there are many exits after APSC, which have all of the improvements , even if minimal. sent on September 13, 2013 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Sharpness - Lightweight - Price - Brightness Cons: Construction - Focus Opinion: I have comparison shots with the Canon 70-200 f4 L lent, the quality of the images was very similar, this would be enough to say that x has a great glass! A 2.8 is a bit 'soft but perhaps already at 3.5 is absurd, great sharpness, the blade can do the strett x, xi and blurred portraits, also has good quality close-up. His problems are unfortunately the building, which is a bit plasticky, I'm afraid x the sand, even if until now he has not happened, and the focus, not absolutely precise! CONCLUSION rnih but against the two lists do not give a damn, they are forced choices x keep down the price and weight, and it sn happy, my photographic style is fairly static, I wanted sharpness el've had it!! To be taken into consideration if you have a small budget :) sent on September 13, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Lightness - Brightness - Price Cons: When focusing is very fast and accurate Opinion: I was looking for a lens street, to use in my many outputs "unpretentious", use the + zoom does not satisfy the same way. I waited for the release of the new version, but when I saw it was with the is, and that cost a fortune (in my opinion too, little more x L is used), I took it immediately before they were stocks, 270 euro new. The building is certainly not super, but it is light, and just to be careful, the ring maf I like, did not give me any problems yet. A ta is not sublime, but the photos in low light is not a problem, since 3.5 I like the most, the edges will improve significantly, sticker underneath and has little sharpness in the center instead is always very sharp, very good glass, and in fact there is only one. The focus in normal light is fast and fairly accurate in low light, well it is better to give him a hand in the manual if potete.rnIN CONCLUSION I like the little I paid, and I think I'll keep it x so long, I advice :) sent on September 13, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price - Brightness - Lightweight Cons: Focus Opinion: I've had it a year, and it was my first drive. The construction is what it is, is a bunch of plastic, if it falls probably crumble, but thanks to this canon is one of the lightest, so it is not a defect. Globally has good sharpness, lose a little 'more to Diaf closed (if you compare it to the 18-55 lens kit type etc. there cmq history, another category). A 1.8 is a bit 'soft, I prefer a little close to having one less fuzzy "knead everything." Closing again, it becomes a good blade for street and reportage. The little light does not make him afraid, and shooting handheld with low iso 100-400.Non has ever given me problems flare, cmq a rubber lens hood costs € 7.'s Af is its Achilles' heel : it is slow, low light and / or moving subject takes a lifetime to engage, and not always focus where you want voi.Cmq, even when fast, this does not imply that it was also preciso.La ring for manual is dimenticare.rnCONCLUSIONI: 100 EUR, either, then buy it, the quality of the lenses is very good, and take the darkness taking and making portraits is a piacere.farete then the brother up to 1.4, which is better in everything, but it costs 3 times tanto.Personalmente, gave me lots of good shots ;) sent on December 06, 2012 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Aperture 2.8 - Construction - AF System-MAF Cons: Excursion reduced Opinion: I've had this lens for a year, and I bought it mainly for the diaphragm 2.8. How to Build quality is very good, is solid and not at all plasticky (even if this is done), it was on the beach (the legs of the tripod were in the water) in the desert without suffering at all. The aperture 2.8 allows you to use it without any problems even in low light freehand with a tripod is perfect, it also allows some creative shooting. To get sharper images, especially at the corners (where cartoon) you have to close some stop and everything improves, often use between f8-f11, however it has an excellent sharpness and I'm satisfied. The af is fine, quite fast and accurate, however, shoot in manual mode is easy, just pull the piston ring to the body and turn a few millimeters (good solution). The flare does not digest very well, but if you use the lens hood (with internal anti-reflection), pp is not difficult to remedy. It weighs a bit ', but it is natural avendo diameter filters 77 and being a 2.8. The front lens is extended only a few mm (1-2) making possible the application of filtri.Di against the excursion has reduced (that one puts into account when buy it), which effectively turns it into 2 fixed, one to 11mm and a 16mm, competition and the same house provide more focal. A 11 distortion is very strong, so it is impossible to take a palace straight, to 16 improves a bit ', I personally like it, is a bit' signing grandangoli.rnrnCONCLUSIONE: objectively is a good goal, personally great, is well built, good sharpness, bright, and good (and functional) f; would recommend it to anyone looking for a 2.8 if he is willing to use it almost exclusively with the inevitable distortion at 11mm, otherwise there are 10-22 12-24 competition sigma and canon . On the web I paid about € 550. sent on December 05, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
