JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1990 to 2013 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 300 €;
46 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros: size and weight, general yield, af very fast convenience of purchase
Cons:nothing
Opinion:I needed a good fix without spending a fortune. search and research I come across this lens, found used x 210 € equal to the new with its original hood (Canon EV-65) light dynamic, auto focus very fast.used on Canon 60D and I must say that the images are very sharp.lo I still have to squeeze properly but from the first tests I am very but very satisfied.
Pros: size and weight, general yield, af very fast convenience of purchase
Cons:nothing
Opinion:I needed a good fix without spending a fortune. search and research I come across this lens, found used x 210 € equal to the new with its original hood (Canon EV-65) light dynamic, auto focus very fast.used on Canon 60D and I must say that the images are very sharp.lo I still have to squeeze properly but from the first tests I am very but very satisfied.
Pros:Small and light, good quality for those who remember when shooting in analog with film. Excellent color rendering.
Cons:For now no one: I use this lens for photos where there is no hurry. In the portraits a little close even at full opening I like it a lot, At a distance a little less. The noise of the Af is part of a dated project.
Opinion:Very happy to have this lens. You can't compare it to the new 35L II, but it doesn't disappoint if the copy is still well maintained (I was lucky enough to find one from Foto Dotti) and will always stay with me! With the R6 I have to say that the yield of this 35 has even improved. It arouses curiosity among people who are now used to seeing "bazooca" in front of a camera!
Pros:size and weight, overall yield, convenience of purchase
Cons:project a bit dated, blurry of medium quality. Not suitable for particularly "stressful" uses.
Opinion:Two premises: I have it for a few years and it is my standard - along with the Canon 17-40 - on 7d and 40d; I have impressions from amateurs, not particularly evolved photographers. A lens of good quality that does not make you cry out for miracle, but there is no reason to complain about it either. The yield is generally good, with the characteristics and limitations of all normal range optics: the sharpness at the edges is not perfect (on APS-C the problem is reduced) and the best yield starts at least from f2.8. The most sore note is the blurring, which at maximum openings is decidedly nervous, perhaps because of the few slats of the diaphragm. Some of the most mentioned defects (noise, sometimes waveand slow AF) are consequential to the age of the project. In summary, it is an optic in my view conceived for purposes and well-defined applications: street, portrait set, landscape, travel reportage... It is an optic spree for a "quiet" use, away from the extreme conditions of speed, brightness or depth of field. If the bar of needs is not particularly high, if used for what is its optimum, giving it the right dose of light and time to do what it has to with the required calm, it provides solid and honest results, so much so that it still enjoys a very good reputation even among professionals. I use it mostly to medium or medium diaphragm and if there is little light it is on the tripod: I am fully satisfied and at its price I would buy it back immediately.
Pros:Small, light, discreet, very good image quality
Cons:AF slow and noisy, lacks the ability to manually correct focus without releasing the AF
Opinion:This 35 f2 offers a great compromise between brightness and size/weight, and makes you forgive some limits with a good optical yield. It is very small and discreet, and allows you to photograph without giving in the eye. The yield is overall satisfactory: already good at TA, better in this of the brother 50 1.8 old that instead softer part, becomes very good from f 2.8 to f 5.6. The newly opened ARSATs do not make you cry out for miracle, but working on it you understand that the detail is there, it just lacks a little microcontrast. With a minimum of sharpening adjustments the images become detailed in a similar way to the 50 1.8 (closed from 2.8 to 5.6), and not far from the 85 1.8 (which however does not require practically sharpening increments). Very correct, not distorting and vignette little, speeding up the work of pp. On the field the greatest limit is the first generation AF, noise (triiik triiik...) and not very fast, especially if the starting distance is quite different from that of focus, where it can happen that it also does one or two bottom run before "understanding" where to stop. On the other hand, the sealing is precise, and no one is thrown away because it is out of focus. Overall I like it and use it willingly, and in addition it cost little. I recommend it and as a vote I do 9.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
