|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tiziano_mohr www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tiziano_mohr  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Sharp, construction, AF, value for money. Cons: No Opinion: I was torn between the 100 and 90 tamron canon and luckily I opted to primo.rnSpesso the photographer a few cm from the subject and the AF interior alone is worth the price difference, plus the USM fast enough (if appropriately limited) also helps to use less convenzionali.rnLa optical quality does not want and is very crisp and clear TA.rnLo blurred it says that it is not the best, but I find it gradevole.rnLa quality of the construction is in line with the rest: excellent . rnQualche time I regret a greater detachment of the plans, characteristic of the lenses with longer focal length, but closer to the macro and the price at which it is proposed is a true affare.rnL 'I also preferred his older brother (100 L is USM) macro because if I do, I always go with the stand (so for me the stabilizer is "useless") and for any portraits because I preferred the openings 85 1.8. sent on March 13, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Sharpness, excellent price, AF Cons: AC Opinion: Caught again for 320euro, I do not know what to ask più.rnProduce sharp images and contrast even at room temperature, the AF system is performing and the usm is a godsend for corrections to "fly" the great sfocato.rnLe AC is correct PP.rnA well in my opinion is the objective to "have" in each kit canon, I consider it the "definitive" if you are not looking for the opening of the 1.2 L brother (but it costs six times as much). sent on March 10, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: 2.8, excellent sharpness, relationship qualitàprezzo eccezionale.rn Cons: AF, resistance to flare, maybe you mount, even on FF ... Opinion: Taken as the first lens after 18-55canon and the jump proved to be very impressive, resulting in joy for the occhi.rnDopo months of use I can only complain about a poorly performing AF especially in low light, but at this price you can not expect really better. (The ring for the focus wheel is approximate and less than 60 degrees). RnIl flare is present, but I was never disturbed over tanto.rnUsato indoors you notice distortion (at 17mm) really small and easily removed in PP. RNLA construction is not a problem, I also have the canon 85 and 100 macro and all 3 give a good impression of solidità.rnUn 'truly excellent optics which I can only confirm the excellent reputation pity that do not mount of FF, which makes it a little less "definitive." sent on February 15, 2013 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: Body (strength and excellent ergonomics), excellent quality-price, good burst. Cons: Micro absent, unacceptable noise after ISO 1250-1600 (but on the other hand is a aps-c), 10 MP a hair tight in the case of cut-outs. Opinion: Hold it in your hand is a gioia.rnPresa a year ago used to 350euro gave me and giving me great soddisfazioni.rnLa consider it a must for anyone who wants to start, but do not want to entrust to the entry-level bodies on mercato.rnSe you content of its simplicity (no video, no screens ultrfighi) you can save some money for a lens and have a body worthy of nota.rnPerfetta in esterno.rnIn inside the iso 1600 where it is still usable are tight, but then not I could ask for more from a aps-c 2007, for the rest there is no micro FF.rnLa me is slowing in the purchase of Sigma lenses. sent on February 14, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
