|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Zanini.m www.juzaphoto.com/p/Zanini.m  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Huawei Mate 10 Pro Pros: Excellent product quality, excellent screen, excellent autonomy, fast processor and non-hexose of resources, IP67 certification Cons: Missing Audio Jack, missing MicroSD slot (things you know) Opinion: I was looking for a replacement of my old but excellent Samsung Note 3 (a phone that after 4-5 years was still higher than some midrange that come out today, with 3 GB of Ram and 32 GB of storage, expandable to 64 GB with micro SD, and battery from 3200 mAh) , and after much reading I am directed on the Mate 10 Pro of Huawei, Dual Sim version found on offer in physical store (no Brand) to €550. The phone pack is very nice (it seems to buy a watch), the phone's equipment is complete with Fast charge charger with detachable cable (full charge in about one hour), earphones with USB-C connector and USB-C adapter ( Phone) to Audio Jack (the connector is not there, but they thus presell use of other headphones), manual, transparent back cover in Silicome that fits very well): compared to certain "scarce" packs of other Top of the range (including Iphone) a nice thing. We come on the phone, I was looking for something fast, with so much autonomy, with good camera and lots of memory, good screen (so also great, the Note 3 had it by 5.7 inches), and here I found everything. 6-inch screen, but almost without edges and therefore less cumbersome, excellent colors and visibility-brightness, fast processor, 6 GB of RAM that are so many really and 128GB of Momeria not expandable (making the Back-up of the content of the Notes 3 I have occupied about 30, So space still for many years), battery and consumption.. Spectacular!!! By now the notes were struggling to arrive at 23 p.m., with average low usage, at 12 a.m. was already at 70-75%, with battery compatible but new grip, while the Mate 10 Pro (with Battery 4000 mAh) at 12 still has about 92-93% , arriving at 11pm at night which is at 70% battery: I make a medium low use, if I listen to a lot of music or watch video The daily consumption surely would increase by 10%, but arrive at the evening of the 2nd day with still 25-30% residual autonomy for me is a grandis Sima thing. Definitely better Hardware, and new and optimized Android 8 system help (note 3 still had Android 5.1, and I think some new applications were not optimized for such old OS versions and consumed much battery). Photos: I have tried only a few, but I seem very valid, 2 rear lenses 12 MP in color and 20 B/n, the latter can work alone (for photos in B/n); or Affiance and interpolar with the 12 MP in color to increase detail, lights and contrast (in a "transparent" to the user who takes pictures), and also excellent the front camera (I'm not at all lover of self, so for me it is not important) flaws, as I was saying no Audio Jack and no SD card, but these things you know when you choose it, battery not replaceable (like almost all smartphones IP67 certified or 68); Also it is difficult to find protections valid for the screen: those in glass is never understood by the reviews if they are valid or not... The version for Sale Single SIM are almost all branded by operators in a very slight, type initial logo and 1-2 apps installed, nothing invasive or blocking (so stores and store online sell products TIM/VODAFONE/three-read well in the ESF purchase If Single-Sim is at 99% brand, some do not like the thing), Dual SIM version (mine) are instead free and directly sold by Huawei, very complete and with so many work of SIM management. Final judgement, rated 9, and I recommend this product sent on May 19, 2018 |
 | Canon 77D Pros: Sensor resolution, overall picture quality, manageability, features, touch screen with LV auto focus selection, pricing features Cons: Nothing serious, perhaps the size for those with big hands, lack of some finishes that are on the 80D. It is unclear whether it supports the SD Version II. Only the Canon batteries are seen by the system, and they are recharged from the original battery charger. For compatibles, you should buy their "charger". There is currently no Battery Grip, we hope Canon will produce it , Or at least some compatible (since even the 7xxD series has the BG) Opinion: The 7D had become somewhat unusual by the female part of the family (too much weight, size, and settings), I was looking for something manageable, but with several features of the 5D Mark III I used to be: Autofocus with so many points, good Iso sensitivity, a burst of at least 4-5 shots, commands in "canon" positions. RnrnAfter so much research I chose this 77D, which is basically a 80D in a slightly smaller body (just a sort of bridge between the 3 series 760D and 2D 70D and 80D series), great for both medium and small hands (less for me I feel good in hand from 80D to 5D): so many comfortable features of the new Canon series, photo output is good, But not excellent for those who are used to the FullFrame. It has the upper display to summarize some information, the Touch screen and twisted back, dual adjustment dial, integrated Wi-Fi and BT.rnMoving some cosines like the 80D, fine fire type setting, 1/8000 shutter, but Surely there are no features that you canThey are looking for you. It was used as a second body with 15-85 and flash EXX II for photographing communions and behaved in an excellent way, good quality (yes, there is a lack of detail, but the sensor and the " Optics are not really Professional) has brought home good shots and great shots.rnComodo the new autofocus with 45 points and the selection for Zone like the new Canon Reflex (remotely remember the poor 9-11 points or even the 19 Series Points earlier). Personally, I would have liked only 18MP, but an extra quality thread. The battery life looks good, tested on about 200-300 Photos with no obvious signs of downloading, also good buffering on a SD-HC 32GB Lexar 1000X, It has never saturated (ok, we are not talking about Avifauna, but ceremony). With the EF-S 15-85 objective slightly unbalanced towards the goal, the 18-135 is better from this point of view (it seems little , But also 100-120 Grams feel) but (apart from 18-55 F2.8) on APS-C on 15-85 isOne of the best in circulation: with the external flash weighs the weight, maybe it's perfect with a BG.rnrnTraining the conclusions as a second body, handy and portable, with good general features, I would say I found what I was looking for. A good Offer, at 850 €, I would say that it will be the "transport" Reflex for so many occasional photos sent on May 15, 2017 |
 | Sirui N2204 Pros: Lightness, quality, capacity, price, equipment Cons: Legs carbon without protective paint (at least it is not glossy, so you do not notice), rubber feet do not sublime (but also spiked metal); to close it completely at the minimum space necessary to remove the ball head Opinion: If interested I wrote a more detailed review, can be found here rnrn-- http://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=1209438 - rnrnComunque as value for money I think has few rivals, tripod with the plus Removable leg that acts as a monopod, bag and belt for the transport of equipment, various configuration possibilities, in conjunction with the heads Sirui K20-K30 xo-x with less than 2 KG have a stand that holds up well even Supertele, at least until 10 KG weight complessivornrnPs if you have to buy, look at the other Amazon Europe, often there are significant price differences sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Sirui K30x Pros: Solid, excellent build quality, well-made commands, Light weight, very affordable price Cons: For now, no one detected Opinion: Only taking it out of the box, you can see the care; there is a pocket of neoprene that prevents scratches, an Allen and instructions: and it is already quite a cominciare.rnil locking occurs gradually and is very stable, comfortable with the possibility of horizontal Pan indication of the degree, and truly stable the "taking" guaranteed by the support Arca Swiss. Maybe a little '"unnecessary" two bubbles on the plate, the mind is to appreciate the security system anti-slip plate, too bad that every home will use a different one and maybe not compatible: here there is a piston that comes out on the plate fixed and slide the movable plate up to a certain point; to release it fully, you have to press a button security. (Benro instead for example using two screws at the end of the plate) .rnPer now tested with 5D Mark III and standard lenses, but soon I test with a 500 F4, the head will be mounted on a tripod always Sirui, the model N- 2204X, of which I will be doing a review sent on February 10, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Zoom Versatile, good quality image if diaphragmed slightly, well built and solid, not too heavy, good hood and housing; zoom mechanism to pump handy once "learned" Cons: Lack tropicalization, is used almost always to 400mm, not 100mm F4; stabilizer a bit 'dated - only 2 Stop Opinion: I chased a long time and then bought to start making photo hunt, used a couple of times, and I was amazed a lot; Central with the 7D I did EXTREMELY sharp photos, using a short time returned sharpness that I did not expect to what I had read (it helps to hinder, my difficulty with the shake of the 7D). It is not too heavy for the type of zoom, I come from a 70-300 F4-5, 6 IS (not L series) and the difference is noticeable. For people like me who does not have very firm hand, maybe the new versions of stabilization from Stop 3-4 would help a lot, 400mm and freehand I can not always immobilize. I think the photo is the first animal to be taken zoom (in competition with fixed 400 F5, 6), and then decide if you are just 400mm, with a view to super telephoto focal sets. Excellent and recommended the riprenderei on the fly! sent on October 03, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: Focal Good coverage, size and weight, price (if KIT) Cons: Build quality mediocre zoom mechanism that extends itself if positioned downwards, sharpness only discrete Opinion: A decent all-round lens, taken with the 7D kit, for use with other Canon APS-C (7D deserves another). Good coverage of focal lengths from wide-angle to telephoto not pushed, my copy has a zoom mechanism very flaccid, but Canon said it's okay. Going back would take maybe a 18-200 which covers more focal with the same quality, it has the lock transport for zooming, and as a quality equivalent. Excellent for machine type 1100D and 600D, 60D and 7D I think of monsters its limits. The price is right for the type of lens if taken in KIT, purchased separately as I said better to invest 100-150 Euros more for the 18-200. sent on October 03, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
