What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 27, 2019 (11:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A test photo taken with the Fujifilm GFX 100, an average of 102 megapixels!
To dispel the myth that "big megapixels need astronomical computers," the photo was posted with my Dell XPS 13 9365 handset, with a meager 1.2 Ghz!
Una foto di prova scattata con la Fujifilm GFX 100, medio formato da 102 megapixel!
Per sfatare il mito che "per le big megapixel servono computer astronomici", la foto è stata post prodotta col mio portatile Dell XPS 13 9365, con un misero processore dual-core da 1.2 Ghz!
|
| sent on June 27, 2019 (11:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Apart from the test value I also like the portrait, the pose and the eyes of the model A parte il valore di test a me piacciono anche il ritratto, la posa e gli occhioni della modella |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful portrait and great pose. Bel ritratto e ottima posa. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (12:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interestingly, I find it superb by definition (but not intrusive) and a wonder for colors. Interessantissimo, lo trovo superlativo per definizione (ma non invadente) e una meraviglia per colori. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Powerful!!! Great Potente!!! Bravissimo |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too bad for the shooting time, 1/50, which lends itself to the micromove, not because of the machine but of the people who are hardly as immobile as statues. Peccato per il tempo di scatto, 1/50, che si presta al micromosso, non per colpa della macchina ma delle persone che difficilmente sono immobili come statue. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (13:33) | This comment has been translated
 |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comments :-)
“ Sad for the shooting time, 1/50, which lends itself to the micromove, „
The photo was taken with the flash, which greatly reduced the risk of chore. The eyes are slightly out of focus because the AF has focused on the lips ;-) Grazie per i commenti :-)
" Peccato per il tempo di scatto, 1/50, che si presta al micromosso,"
La foto è stata scattata col flash, che ha ridotto notevolmente il rischio di mosso. Gli occhi sono leggermente fuori fuoco perchè l'AF ha messo a fuoco sulle labbra  |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (14:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice photo, I like the look of the model.
What do you think of the car?
Is it so better than an FF?
Congratulations
Hello Bella foto, mi piace lo sguardo della modella.
Che cosa ne pensi della macchina?
E' così meglio di una FF ?
Complimenti
Ciao |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (15:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The detail in the area in focus is remarkable (high area of the hair and on the fingers of the left hand where you see the dermatoglyphs).
I expected, instead, something more striking for the tonal gradation, but probably this image does not lend itself much because quite contrasted of its own.
Interesting that you were able to process it without monstrous resources. It's one of the concerns I have when I think about going up with the number of pixels.
... and beautiful also the photo in himself ;-) Il dettaglio nella zona a fuoco è notevole (zona alta dei capelli e sulle dita della mano a sinistra dove si vedono i dermatoglifi).
Mi aspettavo, invece, qualcosa più eclatante per la gradazione tonale, ma probabilmente questa immagine non si presta molto perché abbastanza contrastata di suo.
Interessante il fatto che tu sia riuscito a elaborarla senza risorse mostruose. E' una delle preoccupazioni che ho quando penso a salire col numero di pixel.
...e bella anche la foto in sè |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I believe that having raw files of gendi size does not create big problems in the calculation speed but you just need a carefulness about how much ram you have on the pc.
If you work on individual images at a time without having other programs open 8gb can handle it. Io credo che avere file raw di gendi dimensioni non crei grossi problemi nella velocità di calcolo ma ci sia solo bisogno di un accortezza su quanta ram si ha sul pc.
Se si lavora su singole immagini alla volta senza avere altri programmi aperti 8gb riescono a gestire la cosa. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But only to me does not seem a great thing as general yield (detail, noise etc)? At 64mm and f11 then... I don't understand
Ma solo a me non sembra un granchè come resa generale (dettaglio, rumore etc etc)? A 64mm e f11 poi... Non capisco
|
| sent on June 27, 2019 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think something went wrong...
Beyond the fire, which I don't understand where it is, it seems to me to be a little micromove.
But was the stabilizer active? Secondo me è andato storto qualcosa...
Al di là del fuoco, che non capisco dove sia, mi sembra vistosamente micromossa.
Ma lo stabilizzatore era attivo? |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Maserc because otherwise I don't explain myself. Concordo con Maserc perchè altrimenti non mi spiego. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the comments and opinions!
“ doesn't sound like much to me as general yield (detail, noise etc)? „
if you look at the areas in focus (the depth of field is quite small) I would say they are sharp enough, a couple of examples:
“ What do you think of the machine?
Is it so better than an FF? „
here I published the first impressions: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=3232106
as dynamic range and noise is at the level of the best FFs, while as a detail is much higher. Grazie a tutti per i commenti e le opinioni!
" a me non sembra un granchè come resa generale (dettaglio, rumore etc etc)? "
se guardi le zone a fuoco (la profondità di campo è abbastanza ridotta) direi che sono ben nitide, un paio di esempi:
" Che cosa ne pensi della macchina?
E' così meglio di una FF ? "
qui ho pubblicato le prime impressioni: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=3232106
come gamma dinamica e rumore è al livello delle migliori FF, mentre come dettaglio è nettamente superiore. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (19:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe it's a picture made in haste and fury, ? also because if it were not, it is not worth the 11 thousand and pennies it costs, personally I do not see this striking difference from a full frame reflex but lately I see less and less and maybe I'm wrong. Magari è una foto fatta in fretta e furia, ? anche perché se cosi non fosse, non vale gli 11mila e spiccioli che costa, personalmente non vedo questa eclatante differenza da una reflex full frame ma ultimamente ci vedo sempre meno e magari mi sbaglio. |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (20:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry, I do not understand if it is a tease :-. Only to me opening the photo at full resolution comes a thing smaller than the screen?
The detail on the fingers of the left hand :-or ??? But if it's behind the head!
The tiles cropped by juza in the comment actually have a definition and a detail that have nothing to do with the whole photo, enlarged... Maybe it's a problem with my PC?? Scusate, non capisco se è una presa in giro .. Solo a me aprendo la foto a piena risoluzione viene una cosa più piccola dello schermo?
Il dettaglio sulle dita della mano sinistra??? Ma se è dietro la testa!
I riquadri ritagliati da juza nel commento in effetti hanno una definizione e un dettaglio che non c'entrano nulla con la foto intera, ingrandita... Forse è un problema del mio PC?? |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (21:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the photo.
I think the optics are not up to scratch, but I doubt it. Or the time is too long for such a freehand sensor. Or even the model who moved. In short, something has gone a bit wrong :-D La foto mi piace..
Secondo me l'ottica non è all'altezza ma ne dubito.. Oppure i tempi sono troppo lunghi per un sensore del genere a mano libera.. O anche la modella che si è mossa.. Insomma sicuramente qualcosa è andato un po' storto  |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
quote Peppe :-)
congratulations! quoto Peppe 
complimenti ! |
| sent on June 27, 2019 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ The tiles cropped by juza in the comment actually have a definition and a detail that have nothing to do with the whole photo, magnified... Maybe it's a problem with my PC?? „
try to refresh the page, or you can download the photo from this link to see it on your computer:
https://img5.juzaphoto.com/001/shared_files/uploads_hr/3231982_large50337.jpg
(I recommend opening it with photoshop because the photo Windows viewer sometimes slows down with such large images) " I riquadri ritagliati da juza nel commento in effetti hanno una definizione e un dettaglio che non c'entrano nulla con la foto intera, ingrandita... Forse è un problema del mio PC??"
prova a fare un refresh della pagina, oppure puoi scaricare la foto da questo link per vederla sul tuo computer:
img5.juzaphoto.com/001/shared_files/uploads_hr/3231982_large50337.jpg
(ti consiglio di aprirla con photoshop perchè il photo viewer di windows a volte si rallenta con immagini così grandi) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
101.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
