AMD Ryzen 3600/3600x o 3700x per post-produzione raw?

“ In questo caso vai di threadripper „

“
We've tested several of the Ryzen 3000 processors in manually-overclocked configurations, and the results are predictable: You gain some extra threaded performance over automatic overclocking with PBO, but lose too much performance in lightly-threaded apps to make it worthwhile. In other words, outside of a few edge cases, like systems that will only do heavily-threaded work, manual overclocking simply isn't worth your time -- or the egregious power consumption it requires for relatively small performance gains. „

“ The 3600 - In the end we got the proc stable at 4200 MHz on all cores at 1.425V. This, however, was pushing it. I would, in theory, recommend a default voltage usage and a 4.1 GHz all-core tweak if your proc can handle it. Even more, recommended, don't overclock as the benefits are really small if at all as the separate higher turbo bins can go higher then your all-core tweak. „

“ For the most part, the best configurations for DDR4 (and even DDR3) performance have been at multiples of 266.6x MHz, but DDR4-3600 doesn't fit that scheme. Since we're unwilling to take our DDR4-3600 all the way down to DDR4-3466, one might wonder why we don't simply jump up to DDR4-3733? For Ryzen 3000, the answer lies within the assumed stability limitation of its I/O die. AMD switches its onboard Unified Memory Controller frequency (UCLK) to 1/2 of the DRAM data rate whenever DDR4-3600 is exceeded, and further protects controllers on the I/O die from instability by decoupling its Infinity Fabric clock when exceeding that frequency. „

“ The easy conclusion is that every enhanced setting that you'd expect to boost the performance of AMD's Ryzen 3000 series CPUs, does, that it's not optimized for any specific data rate but scales proportionally with all stable data rates. So here's a short list of our findings—that is to say, confirmations:

Going from two ranks to four ranks of memory is by far the best way to improve performance in memory-bottlenecked applications. At current memory density, that usually means having at least 32GB (even if you don't think you'll use that much capacity).
Switching from 2T to 1T command rate provides a similar performance boost to shaving two cycles from CAS Latency.
The only time DDR4-3200 C14 and DDR4-3600 C16 have similar performance is when the slower kit has the better (1T) command rate.
Overclocking to DDR4-3733 provides a nice performance boost, but only if you're able to stably do it with synchronized UCLK and FCLK.
The best practical configuration is four ranks of DDR4-3600 at the lowest stable latencies. Reminder: Four ranks can be achieved from either four single-rank or two dual-rank DIMMs.
Keeping in mind that not every overclocking adventure produces the expected results, a 32GB DDR4-3600 C16 kit such as the one we used today is a great starting point and an acceptable finish line. „