@Marameo: La Lightjet stampa i poster. La usa Pixart per le "stampe fotografiche di alta qualità".
Da TheLuminousLandscape, Oce Lightjet vs. Epson (ma potrebbe benissimo essere la serie IPF di Canon):
“ There are only two scenarios today that would push me to use a Lightjet. One is if I needed a larger size print than an Epson can deliver. The other is if I absolutely needed to print on a high gloss finish print. That is the one and only area that the Lightjet outperforms an inkjet these days.
The Lightjet will be more economical for high volume printing, but you can pick up an 11880 for under $10K now, and a 9900 for a little over half that.
In all of your criteria, the Epson is better:
Color Gamut - Much larger on the Epson and especially visible in sunsets and images with bright blues, yellows and greens.
Tonal Range - Not sure what is meant here, but if you mean the range from the blackest black to the brightest white, then the nod goes again to the inkjet.
D-Max - depends on the paper, but most photo papers using Photo Black ink will be able to print blacker blacks than the LJ.
Detail - Again, dependent on the paper, but the new Epsons will be equal or slightly outperform the LJ.
Longevity - According Wilhem, the inkjets are significantly longer lasting than LJ
Paper choice - No contest here. The range of papers is literally staggering for inkjet, from photo to fineart, watercolor and canvas, and quite limited for LJ. „
Questo è quello che intendevo con “ purché sappiano quello che fanno „
. 
JuzaPhoto contiene link affiliati Amazon ed Ebay e riceve una commissione in caso di acquisto attraverso link affiliati.
