Jonathan Slack risponde su getdpi agli utenti... a mio parere ha pubblicizzato un po' "troppo" il fatto che ha restituito laA7 
Originally Posted by roanjoh View Post
“ So you had issues with the 35 lux? Hmmm..........this is not sounding good. Although the A7 is said to have less issues (corner smearing, magenta shift) compared to the A7r. I will have to see when my camera comes. „
They weren't that serious - and I could have lived with it if there wasn't a perfectly good M sitting here as an alternative.
---
Originally Posted by Quentin_Bargate View Post
“ Difficult, surely, for anyone to reach a definitive conclusion about any camera when it has so far been used for the most part with lenses not designed for it.
My first experience of the A7R, hopefully at the end of this week, will be with the Zeiss 35mm F/2.8 ZE lens.
HI Quentin „
I absolutely agree - and my rejection was not based on any shortcoming of the camera itself - but because I don't want to carry a bag of big lenses around with me, having a teeny body just means that they handle badly!
At first I thought it would be interesting - I could use the A7r with the 24-70 zoom, 1 telephoto and then use M lenses shared between it and the M(240) - and get rid of my µ43 kit. However I realised that there were too many compromises involved in using M lenses between it and my Leica (I was expecting vignetting, but not smearing).
My current setup works really well - 2 M bodies, an E-M1 and an E-P5 together with some excellent lenses - the A7r was going to muddy the water badly, without really bringing anything new to the party . . . . . . . I reserve the right to change my mind later if the native lenses turn out to be excellent quality and small . 
JuzaPhoto contiene link affiliati Amazon ed Ebay e riceve una commissione in caso di acquisto attraverso link affiliati.
