3,5 stelle su 5 non è male, sono abbastanza severi.
La chiave della loro review sta in questo paragrafo, ecco perchè lo consigliano nonostante come aperture sia "buia" e quindi già in diffrazione già a f5.6:
“
Let's split the verdict into two parts this time because context is important. Lab results are one thing, but that's the beginning of wisdom and not the end of it. Yes, the Fujinon XF 150-600mm f/5.6-8 R LM OIS WR is a slow lens. However, we can see where Fujifilm is coming from here. If you've ever carried a 600mm f/4 lens into the outdoors, you know that it's a PAIN. And slow lenses are simply more compact and lightweight. Realistically, Fujifilm won't be able to compete with a full format 600mm f/4 anyway, but they can compete with similar super-tele zoom lenses. The other aspect that you have to keep in mind is that outdoor conditions are less than perfect most of the time. There's atmospheric interference from heat or haze at longer distances, and there's always a bit of wind at least. In real life, you rarely achieve the same maximum sharpness as in lab conditions. So while the MTFs may not be top-notch, they are more than just "good enough" in the real world on 26-megapixel sensors at least. 40 megapixels may be a different story. Thus based on real-world use, we are happy with what the lens can deliver ... and specifically that the burden of carrying it around wasn't unbearable. „
POi nella pagina precedente spiegano come funziona la diffrazione nei sensori APSC, molto interessante e da leggere bene cong rafici e altro:
opticallimits.com/fuji_x/1150_fuji150600f568?start=1
Paragrafo "Diffraction on APS-C cameras"