JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:A stunning performance optics, excellent blurry, great sharpness from F 2.8 to F 11
Cons:A TA great difference in sharpness between center and edges, but in the portrait is not necessarily a defect.
Opinion:I have used for 20 years the little brother 1.7 which I think is more engraved with the intermediate diaphragms, but the blurring and the plasticity of the 1.4 are priceless. It is an extraordinarily light lens, easy to find in the used, but absolutely not to be underestimated, a feature that I tested in the field is the "hold" to the very closed diaphragms, at F 11 presents a sharpness still excellent, I used it in macrophotography with extension tubes and while being less "brought" than his brother Planar 100mm F2 (which has a floating lens just to optimize the shots at the minimum focus distance) offer more than good results. But the speciality of this optics is to place the subject in relief by beautifully defining the three-dimensionality of the subject well highlighted by the splendid blurry. You can find it in the second hand on the 250 Euros, once you have put on your camera you will forget about the autofocus and automation, and you will be YOU again who decide HOW to write with light.... You will throw away the first 50 shots, the next 40 will not please you, but then it will be just love.....
Pros:Large opening that allows, with acceptable times in light shortage, an already more than good definition. In the medium openings offers instead performances, I dare say, beyond the current average: Plasticity and airiness that result in a particularly brilliant rendition of the colors, a superb definition, with a marked impression of three-dimensionality of the subject portrait . Mounted on Sony ML It "self-stabilizes" and the MAF is of a disarming simplicity.
Cons:Fully manual Objective.
Opinion:A glass and a mechanics of The past. Solid, still very fluid rings, damped just enough, despite the venerable age, I think gives a lot of "twisting" to any other 50mm current, any Brand, including its new "close relatives", 50mm C. Zeiss T *-is Not "Partisanry", the I still believe, with data in hand, objective, verifiable, a 50mm of excellence, of pure race... On the way to extinction.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
