|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on November 26, 2018 Pros: General quality, sharpness, stabilization Cons: Sometimes chromatic aberrations and af not very precise Opinion: I can only positively review this lens after selecting it among the many 35mm on the market. The choice fell on Tamron even if f 1.8, for lightness, compactness, Price and stabilization (which never fails). Excellent lens, according to all points of view. Well built, solid and with a nice modern design. At full aperture is very appreciableeven if (of course) a bit soft; From 2, 2.8 onwards remarkable, from 4 outstanding. Vote Ten for Sharpness! The stabilizer is sensational, unmoved shots with Nikon D810 even at 1/6 sec., what do you want more? The colors? Great. At the opening you have to be careful to some chromatic aberration, rather annoying and some "misfires" of the AF without a real apparent reason. Another positive note that made me prefer to other 35mm is the ability to get closer to the subject to make it look almost like a macro! Remarkable. Congratulations to Tamron! Loved! |
 | sent on September 22, 2018 Pros: Quality, performance, price Cons: Opening F Max 1.8 Opinion: Purchased flipping through the useful Juzaphoto tips for now has never disappointed! I have never had the way to test the Sigma and Canon competitors but I must say that this 35mm does its duty very well! The only flaw, in my opinion, is the diaphragm that does not get to 1.4 but at the actual I think it is fine even the opening to 1.8. |
 | sent on July 25, 2018 Pros: Build quality, sharpness, price, flare resistance, colors, MAF at 20cm! Cons: AF sometimes undecided, chromatic aberrations Opinion: I tested this lens on Canon 5d MK3, I find it aesthetically "attractive", solid, compact and generally very well built. Starting with the cons, as already mentioned, I think the autofocus a little ' undecided (as often happens with third optics on canon) in fact sometimes it happens that I have to do a couple of races back and forth before hooking the subject. Other cons are the aberrations, in fact in the backlight are quite obvious but fortunately always eliminable with a click in PP. Moving on to the pros, the 1.8 lens is a soft thread but cmq appreciable while closing a couple of stops becomes a real blade and returns a sharpness, detail and color from true pro lens. In addition to this, the quality that I appreciate most is in portraits the ability to detach the subject from the background to the equal of optics with focal well more pushed, and not only open.... for a 35mm I find it incredible! As a vote I gave 9 for the two cons found otherwise would have been by 10 and definitely of another price range... In conclusion I would buy it back??? Absolutely! I would recommend it??? If you do not have an indispensable need for an F/1.4 absolutely YES! |
 | sent on May 14, 2018 Pros: compactness, aesthetics, stabilization, serious lens hood, weight, price, sharpness Cons: Less fast in AFC than AFS, at least on Nikon D700 Opinion: Bought at a great price in physical store (ex Demo) mounted on the D700 has immediately shown its qualities of sharpness, rendered color and beautiful blurry. A brief comparison with the Sigma Art. It made me prefer it for compactness and weight and I did not regret it, between the two the Sigma is a hair sharper, but this is due to the stabilization of the Tamron which, conversely, is effective. Used with K&F adapter on Sony A6000 and A7II with manual focus: excellent |
 | sent on May 14, 2018 Pros: Construction, compactness, solidity, image quality, stabilization, tropicalization... etc... Cons: Some chromatic aberration at very open apertures. Opinion: Bought a few months after having previously excluded the two Nikkor (the F 1.8 because objectively poorer and the F 1.4 because frighteningly expensive without being so much better) after a quick runoff with Sigma Art. F 1.4. The latter, perhaps better with regard to sharpness and even nicer aesthetically, cost something more by offering something less (see stabilization). Of the Tamron I can only speak well, I like it! Nice solid but not too heavy and cumbersome, hyper effective stabilization so much to get almost 1/4s freehand, sharp (although a little less than the Sigma from this point of view having the stabilizer sometimes makes a difference as well on these focal lengths) , resistance to flare excellent with unique neo of chromatic aberrations at very very open apertures... Recommended! |
  | sent on March 24, 2018 Pros: excellent sharpness, very effective stabilization, accurate construction Cons: nothing Opinion: I have had this lens for several months and I use it on Nikon FF. Tamron has done a good job: the object is solid, has the right balance once mounted on the machine, the ferrules run smoothly, allows a very close focus, the autofocus is very reactive and precise, the resistance to reflections it's excellent. As for sharpness, it is more than good for intermediate diaphragms; at maximum opening the edges lose sharpness, to recover it from f: 2.8 onwards. It is a valid alternative to the Nikon of equal focal length and brightness. Recommended. |
 | sent on February 12, 2018 Pros: Weight, tropicalization, cost, stabilization, TA yield Cons: Not having bought it before. Opinion: I chose this goal, after many reviews of reviews etc. etc., for the reasons that I will list: rnrn1) costs less than Sigma (which has undergone a price increase of almost € 200 in 2 years because of fashions); rn2) weighs less and is less cumbersome; rn3) it is true that the Sigma is f1.4 but it recovers more brightness with the stabilization of the Tamron that with the passage from f1.8 to f1.4 (among other things difficult to manage given the reduced pdc); rn4) stabilization and tropicalization; rn5) compared to the series Art has much less problems than AF. rnrnLent qualitatively impeccable and that comes well calibrated (on D750), unlike the Sigma that with some of its models makes you literally go crazy for the AF. |
 | sent on September 25, 2017 Pros: Construction, aesthetics, sharp opening, blurred, pastel and delicate shades, great price, extended warranty, stabilizer, minimum unmatched maf distance. Cons: In my opinion AF-C (on Nikon) is not as accurate as AF-S; weight: while remaining very well balanced, the 440g make you feel. Opinion: The optic is built really well, with a sense of solidity and care in remarkable details. The selectors are large and comfortable to maneuver, the focus ring is very fluid and soft. Well-balanced (on D750) even though the 440gs make you feel. It is also reassuring to see how tamron is engaging in the construction of lenses with some pluss that are not on the counterpart. I find the stabilizer very efficient, in 1 / 50sec video. free hand Tamron vibration compensation seems to work very well keeping the video very stable. The colors and nuances of blurry remain tender and pleasant, never nervous. Optics that really took me seriously. Bravo Tamron. |
 | sent on May 22, 2017 Pros: Construction; Speed ??MaF; Sharp opening; out of focus; colors; Price and guarantee. Cons: I did not find it. Opinion: I have the Tamron 35mm for about three months, on Canon 5DMkIII. I also had the Canon 35 f2 IS USM, great lens, on the previous body, a 6D. I had some perplexity before buying it, fearing that a third-party lens might hold some unknown. The trusted retailer advised me and he was right. A robust yet not too heavy, well-balanced lens gives a solid sense of solidity; Fiery and always precise focus; Excellent minimum distance (0.20 m) also to afford some blur open all the way; Natural colors.rnThe price is justified by the obvious improvement Tamron has had in its latest productions, plus a 10 year warranty !! The 35mm L series are much more expensive and I do not know, frankly, if this focal length really needs opening Even greater, weighing and much higher price.rn Definitely, I would definitely recommend it, you will not regret it. |
 | sent on January 30, 2017 Pros: sharpness already at f1.8, great stabilizer, weight and weather sealing, materials top of the range, assembly. Cons: nobody. Opinion: given the already posted reviews I will try to shed light on other factors, many complain about the price ... rnora should better analyze the set of the "package deal" rncanon sells similarly priced or maybe (as I found online) 40 € less a 35mm..f2 WITHOUT hood, which puts on the same price the two abbinandocene slow one, then lower specifications, at least on paper, such as quality of the lenses, aperture, tropicalization old .... !! rnsigma instead offers a 35. .f1.4 the grand opening .... even the wallet, not to have stabilized and even less tropicalization, a much greater weight and in my opinion (and personal experience with other models) no sigma gets along with the low temperatures. ..soffrono much already around 6 gradi.rnin all substance I find the most balanced of the Tamron 35mm any purpose and to return the price nobody offers 10year warranty as do loro.NESSUNO |
 | sent on December 15, 2016 Pros: Sharpness at ta, stabilized and tropical conditions Cons: At the moment no, maybe the price Opinion: It took a little over a month on the market of Juza e'ho tested at a wedding on a slack body as the 5d. Excited is the word giusta.Lo further put under stress but the early signs seems more than a great acquisto.rnUnico neo maybe the price, maybe compared to the sigma that is little brighter |
 | sent on October 17, 2016 Pros: Compact, crisp, stabilizer, f / 1.8, the lens hood included Cons: the price? Opinion: I state that I have this goal in my kit (unfortunately) but I'm going to buy it in the near future. I got to try it fine on my 100D, and must say it has given me great satisfaction. I did some first floor and was crystal clear, full-length and has not messed miss you. absolutely great! rnsu APS-C is a 56 equivalent, so for my taste in the portraits he has the perfect focus, well-balanced that depth to the picture but without esagerare.rnla you pay for, and you know ... even online price is not low, clear, it also costs more than the Canon EF 35mm f / 2 iS USM, so in case of Canon use, you should try both lenses before deciding. rnNote positive that I really appreciate from fixed user of Tamron lenses, the lens hood is standard, shame on canon that makes them well-salted pay. |
 | sent on July 05, 2016 Pros: Sharpness already TA, stabilizer, blurred, opening 1.8, color, contrast, minimum focusing distance of 20 cm fire, toughness, 10-year warranty Cons: nobody Opinion: L 'I took yesterday for my D610, after selling the Nikon 24-85 G, I was torn between nikon Sigma and Tamron, but the Nikon has no stabilizer and Sigma has too many negative reviews about the' autofocus, so I decided why Tamron. I did it again only a few test shots, and the first pictures I noticed to 'start the contrast which is great, the colors are very attractive, have a something that makes them very beautiful and blurred what about ..... .. is beautiful and combined with a reduced minimum focusing distance (20 cm) allows you to do some very creative and special shots. But guys ....... sharpness sharpness of this 'objective is amazing already at 1.8, is definitely the' sharpest lens I, even more than the 180 3.5 Tamron macro and Nikon 50mm 1.8; enlarging the 'image at 100% you see an impressive detail, as if the photo had been taken so completely and without defects such aberrations or other, the edges of the subject in focus are perfect. I did thensome shots to test the stabilizer which is really good, like the Tamron 70-300 VC, engages the subject and not let it anymore, I took it to 1/5 seconds and the picture is perfect coming even though I do not know if it is the its limit, try prossimamente.rnIn longer has 10-year warranty. Excellent highly recommended goal. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
