RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on December 25, 2014

Pros: Wide range of focal lengths. Good yield at all focal lengths to be a handyman, at least up to 200 mm., Excellent bokeh. Weight, size, structure. Stabilizer excellent, fast and quiet. MAF fast and precise. Footprint "over all" also contained 300 mm. Tropicalizzazione.rnUna lens all in one discreet for those not looking for great quality, and it is in situations of reportage that vary continuously too quickly to change goal, and in those difficult when it becomes complicated and risky to change the optics.

Cons: For now it reflected the usual defects of this lens range extremes: some distortion, images gradually softer than 200. Color fringing in some situations. Price (I've heard from many quarters that the beginning of 2015 will be applied to the new official list, going from the current 740 to 990 euro)

Opinion: I was always very skeptical about optical forces of this kind and of this price range. The alternative: the Canon 28-300, much more heavy and cumbersome, on the market today to ca. 2500 euro. The need for a versatile and lightweight lens in addition to my kit Canon excellent, to which I trust I have always been and always with me, pushed me to groped with this latest version in order to provide convenience and quick recovery during my work of reportage, and many of the critical condition of travel: sailing, sandy deserts, wind and dust, 7-12 hour drive to the neck continuously for days; too awkward and weight for 2 camera bodies in the most cases. I expect this' optical, of course, the image quality is not of a high standard; will be studied for a moment to figure out how to make the most and I also expect to have to spend a few minutes in PP., I hope it's worth it: I need versatility and reduce risks of continuous changes of optics. I tested it for now only on a 5D Mk2, a few dozen shots; for usethat I do seems to promise as much as I expected, maybe more.

avatarsupporter
sent on July 21, 2014

Pros: impeccable construction, compactness and therefore very contained weight, wide range of focal lengths that make it in fact an "all in one", optical performance of all respect at least up to 200 mm, efficient stabilizer, focus (even in relatively low light) very fast, seamless interaction with the Canon 5D Mk II; oddly, the 1DX the MAF on occasion is a bit distressed and not just in low light and, although rarely, must "give a little help" manual; not detected the presence of significant chromatic aberrations nor of particular phenomena of "flare". A correction of the details on the card, the goal is a full time AF.

Cons: Price not exactly "popular" (paid in the store about 750 euro), understandably to 300 mm, the yield falls, though not dramatically, the absence of true macro capability.

Opinion: Always been an admirer of the wide-range zoom that in my personal view well matched to digital photography for many reasons and having particularly enjoyed the more than good results of the Tamron 16-300 for APS-C I decided "gut" purchasing the latest Tamron 28-300 f / 3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD (being impossible for me the Canon original). Sin'ora I not regretted it: a practical and a "portability" unmatched (important qualities that can sometimes mean being able to bring home the picture) combines optical qualities generally and moderately respectable no details and / or showy qualitative collapses in any parameter. Recommended for amateurs of practicality and compactness lovers!





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me