JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Versatility - A variation always come out with one goal
Cons:Pitch dark in many situations, the great stabilizer does not work miracles - up from 200 the image quality becomes a mirage
Opinion:When I took it seemed like a good choice, in hindsight ... is convenient because it allowed me many times to go out without purse, and switch to a landscape, to shoot a bird on a tree in 1 second, but the compromises are many: it is bright, with little light in my hand is almost always been impossible to take pictures freehand, l is is great, in my hand (very firm) compensates for 3 stops, but does not do miracles. The focus is lentina, but acceptable condition No normal, low-light and moving subjects (in particular the focal length of 200-270) is ... I would say eccentric ... because you never know who will combine. Until around 150 mm overall image quality (sharpness, vignettaura, distortion, the difference between corner and center, c) is more acceptable and less homogeneous, more and better standard of classical canon 18-55 etc. .... but above this focal the edges are impastatissimi, and dark, and also in the center, there is not much dettaglio.rnIN CONCLUSION my first picture I made with him, but I would not lor advice, take 2 lenses if you want a hike so great, canon 15-85 and 70-200 f4 if you want long distances, canon 10-22 and 24-105 if you love landscapes and reportage, or cm ², avoid long trips.
Pros:Versatile, practical, handyman and assistance Polyphoto really efficienternrnrn
Cons:is useless, AF inaccurate, very noisy and not particularly focuses on it.
Opinion:Finding myself using this lens despite having liked to have a view all, I realize that it's no use! I no longer take off and put other goals but with this I can not do anything. It's not perfect, nor much less clear and stable is really not very functional. I made a bad purchase I do not know the other versions but this is the worst!
Pros:Versatile, allows you to carry around a single lens (if you do not have too many claims)
Cons:Image quality, focus is not always perfect and noisy.
Opinion:It 'was my first lens on my first digital SLR camera. I've used it a lot and for a long time, often postponing his "retirement." This lens I have read a lot and found many differing opinions and many defects are not always seen by all or all in the same way as if you were speaking of different perspectives. I can personally say that, under ideal light, has offered good results, while suffering from a focus noisy and not always accurate. Failure possibility of Full Time MF has not been helpful. Certainly allowed me to travel "light", always with me a wide angle and a telephoto in a single lens.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
