| sent on March 16, 2013
Pros: Image quality, size, excellent electronic viewfinder and the integrated flash, customization, ergonomics, size, orientation features, the peacking makes it easy to use the goals to fire manualernQualità constructive high
Cons: Park optic native tight, of the same size that often detract from the advantages of compactness of the body, adjustable screen only in two directions, battery charging system (but there are alternatives). I do not care for now, but that misses the point out jack for an external microphone.
Opinion: I just bought the nex-6n with the 16-50 instead of a Nex-5n with 18-55, additional viewfinder and flash obviously not integrated. Compared to the younger sister, which I think is another great camera in its own way, I gained in compactness, which was my original intention. The body of the 5n is more compact, but with the 18-55, the flash in your pocket and electronic viewfinder mounted in fact the package is more cumbersome and wasteful. Once the camera arrived I was able to appreciate the best ergonomics, interface easier to manage, the convenience of stasto FN. Does not have the touch screen, but to me that's okay, because that board using both 5n EOS I was to give the fingerprints on the large monitor SLR Canon.rnCome said the image quality is not great but greater than that of younger sister , which uses sensor and processors almost identical. The focus is fast, thanks to the use of both technologies. Very convenient customizable FN key to access veiltively to the settings most frequently used. Nice HDR though, almost admitting his own limitations, only works on JPG. The EVF has a very good definition and turns on / off much faster than the optical 5n.rnDivertentissima with vintage, thanks to the wide availability of inexpensive adapters and the focus peaking.rnIl swiveling display is convenient to use the camera by very high or very low, but only in extreme horizontal. Allows vertical instead of shooting from optical nascosti.rnIl park is not at the level of one of the micro 4/3, much less than that of the SLR. Is growing but in a disorderly manner and lack professional zoom. Plus some objectives may be more compact and better exploit the small size of nex.rnTerrificante the supplied charger, which only allows the battery Montanta on fotocamenra. And 'slow, does not allow to use the machine during charging and not charging the batteries from third parties. Luckily there are a few money chargersuniversal conclusion that go far bene.rnIn a great choice for those who want to travel light without sacrificing a high quality image and for those who want to use optical vintage. Used with the 16-50 is little more than a compact, but the result is hardly comparable. |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
