RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on October 24, 2019

Pros: Almost EVERYTHING!

Cons: Weight.Paraluce. Price but Quality Costa!!!

Opinion: I find a best 24-70 ever produced so far!!! I can compare it to canons and tamrons you've had before... Not that comparison! And my personal opinion! With a7III, a6300 and old lady a7R behaves like God! In 4K video, it can solve the FF sensor to the fullest! Maybe we could complain about the lampshade that Aunt Sony could do a little bit more... I recommend trying!!!

avatarsupporter
sent on December 21, 2018

Pros: Fast, accurate, reliable

Cons: Flare-Plasticous Lens Hood

Opinion: Excellent lens, I use it as everything do with my A7R3. I do not find any faults nor encundiments nor weight, but this is only a purely subjective factor. On a practical level it is a lens that you don't miss a photo. Performing, fast and accurate as I said in the title. The only big flaw in my opinion are the presence of flare... definitely too annoying and you have to resort to stratagems or other to avoid them. I mean, they wouldn't even be such a big problem, but for what it costs and what it promises, it shouldn't suffer so much. For the rest, I have nothing to say: It is definitely a very good target!

avatarjunior
sent on November 01, 2018

Pros: Everything make fantastic-solid construction-aesthetically beautiful-crisp-weather sealed-F2,8 constant-excellent bokeh-excellent for landscapes and portraits-precise, fast and quiet AF.

Cons: Flare – Plasticky Lens hood – price even if justified.-

Opinion: I bought it these days for my Sony Alpha 7riii fabulous binomial. I do not list all the positive things I checked, I would bore you, I do first to say that I did not find anything negative. The flare you OK is boring (the backlight must be really crash) but just open it 1 or 2 stops and everything is solved. A limit in post production with Lightroom resolves the whole thing quickly and easily. I come from Nikon and Nikon lenses, fabulous, this I think has nothing to envy.

avatarjunior
sent on January 07, 2018

Pros: sharpness, speed in focusing, practically a whole do 24-105 (70 to 105 in APS-C)

Cons: the weight, even if in line with the characteristics of the objective.rn

Opinion: I have just made a 16-day trip to Sicily and, as I usually do, in addition to the A7R2, I also brought with me the precious 28 mm to be assembled in the moments when the 886 g are felt. I can say that I have never replaced the formidable 24-70 mm f / 2.8, so the weight, which was an unknown factor, was not a problem. I just looked at the pictures of the trip and I'm excited about the sharpness, the colors and the depth of the images. I will not dwell on the characteristics of the lens already widely described by Giuseppe Proto that I share.rnThe purchase of this lens has simplified my optical systems: I sold both the 55 mm and 90 mm that would have taken dust.rnIn 50 years of photography passed between Nikon and Canon is definitely the best lens possessed (without forgetting the camera body!).

avatarjunior
sent on October 16, 2017

Pros: SONY'S TOP (CONSTRUCTION - YIELD - AF AND BOKEH)

Cons: FLARE and PRICE (but not prohibited)

Opinion: Does the question still make sense to buy this lens? For me, YES! I owned it for two years (2017-2019), sold it to replace this lens with a Sony 50mm, a nonsensical move and here I took it back but without fainting too much together with the Sony a7RIII. An exceptional lens both in its construction and in its performance. The first 24-70GM I owned was resolute but in some cases it was poorly engraved (especially at f2.8) This I find very engraved even at full opening from 24 to 70. The focus engine, despite being an SSM, works very well. Even in continuous af continuo. The Bokeh is very soft and the color is very natural with well balanced contrast. With the sony a7RIII the use for Street photography, portraits, landscape and reportage.. Personally it is a lens that deserves to be bought, although the competition is very ruthless especially with tamron and Sigma. Although many are waiting for a version 2 of the next 24-70, I don't like to give the votes but personally deserves a 9.5 Brava SONY

avatarjunior
sent on September 01, 2017

Pros: Quality, precision, speed, construction and design are at the highest levels

Cons: ONLY ATTACK AND

Opinion: I've been waiting to reconsider this optic so I can get a better idea. I'm coming from the Nikon world where (they all know) that its optics are amazing both in quality and in speed. I recently owned a D810 with 24 70 2.8 VR and I can say quietly that Sony's GM is clearly sharper, soft in the boker and silent than the Canon version I got to know through a dear friend.rn WHAT TO AGGREGATE? PERFECT:) rn

avatarjunior
sent on February 22, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, Boken, costruzionern

Cons: Flare, weight.

Opinion: I waited a little bit before drawing my conclusions for the simple reason that I have not got to try it for a whole day, which, took place last Monday .l'obbiettivo from the great feeling of robustness and accuracy in even the nuts details they are fluid and useful. By F 2.8 to F 5.6 returns a quality sharpness and three-dimensional feeling of detachment and unique plans, even the colors seem good to say nothing of the boken, extraordinary 2.8 .Sadly closing more the lens lose a lot, especially in color rendering and all the eden seems to fade. backlit an annoying flare (I always photographed with fixed, and I like their example, 25 batis of zeiss in against full light does not bat an eyelid but then again being a fixed headlights have less and less possibility of such symptoms) .In Overall a great lens considering that it is a 24/70 weight seems to me too is average competition. I reserve as I will have to play a bit of he reviewedKing more accurately.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me