RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sigma SD Quattro : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sigma SD Quattro)


What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsupporter
sent on December 10, 2020

Pros: Image quality, construction, price, ease of use, No video, not a Bayer, jpeg already great

Cons: It's not a Bayer, totally different approach, basically an ML prototype with Reflex attachment.

Opinion: I write a couple of things after 3 years of use. Solid and well-built machine body, few things and those you need, you don't need the manual to use it. Particular design, too bad the hideous fixed extension tube to accommodate Reflex optics. Spectacular and unapproachable images for any Bayer. No one talks about it but jpegs are already excellent as well as exposure and BW, rarely makes mistakes and you really have to force it to do so. It is not a Bayer and cannot be used as such. 100 fixed iso, you can get to 400 in emergency but with a loss of quality, in Black and White you can reach up to 1600 with grain effect. Essential and slow but reliable AF compared to previous models, AFC does not exist. In 2017 (the year I bought it) there were problems with artifacts, probably an excessive intervention on the NR. Since 2018 the problems have been solved (I believe from FW1.08) and even the subsequent FW have made the machine excellent for file quality, the limits obviously remain such. Raw processing SW (X3F) is slow but acceptable and is the only one that makes the most of your files. They have implemented shortcuts such as DNG files and PS plug-ins to open X3F files but they are all pejorative. The battery consumption is high, I use the screen little, turn off the machine as soon as possible, tends to heat even in Stand-by. For overheating so many legends, I use the event machine, 90-100gb of material on 2 bodies. The symbol (temperature) appeared to me 3 times in 3 years. July 35 degrees. RiminiComix. It is not a machine for everyone, those who come from the film benefit, those born with digital and Bayer will be embarrassed by this machine. We need bright and obviously heavy optics. I've seen a lot of SDQs sold with old Sigma optics blaming SDQ. The low price did damage in this case. It is, however, a flagship and must be coupled accordingly. The SA attack is highly limiting. The machine could be improved with little, they could at least make a version 2 with L attachment. Body defects, front ring on the shutter button too hard, comes from previous models, flash sled attack that sometimes inexplicably loses contact with its flash and trigger. Horrible, unsynchronized shooting noise, sometimes 1/4000s shots and the shot is like shooting at 1/10s.

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2020

Pros: magnificent Foveon sensor; well-robust body; removable IR filter in an instant!!!; monitor divided into two parts super clear, NO VIDEO

Cons: SA attack; it is a mirrorless "false"; very weak battery

Opinion: Last year I had it for about a month, time to test it and decide whether to keep it or not, I had taken it for this purpose. What to say, a magnificent machine. Starting from the body, it is hyper robust with the keys well reachable and that give excellent feedback. Excellent ergonomics, perhaps a little too pronounced. Wonderful screen clear and visible and divided into two that I find very practical Photo Side: Autofocus is not really at the top, but in short it is still a modern AF of 2016 so it does its duty, nothing dramatic, I do not understand all these photographers who if they do not have precise fire at the slightest touch the button of the shot do not live. Knowing how to focus is a capable one that is apparently being lost. held to ISOs say poor? it really depends on the photographer, 1600 are the limit for color photos, for SW photos there are no limits, but I am one of those who takes the time to take a photograph, and I often ride with the tripod, I use practically only manual optics, so having a slightly slow autofocus when every now and then it is not a problem for me at all , just as it's not shooting at low isos. over 1600 I really go there mooooolto hardly. Whereas for the Foveon sensor I had never had one before. Wow. It's great. It returns results that Bayer dreams of. There are no comparisons at all, indeed I am really sorry that Sigma to date is uncertain about the future of this technology, because if developed it would really bring interesting results. The resolution it returns, the colors, the gradients, the shadows, the dynamic range..... Bayer can never get us to such results, it's in everyone's cameras because it keeps the high ISOs better, that's all! but it's not the best technology, that's clear. Then for someone like me who's in love with BN photography, this machine is something exceptional. If you don't try it you can't really explain it, but the photos are special, they are pleasant to look for the eye all those grays so natural ... Unfortunately I did not keep it because it must be taken into account that it has an attack that is very difficult to make on the market of the new and used, and having a mirrorless kit, and since this sigma is a false mirrorless in the sense that it has a horrible protrusion that can allow it to receive reflex optics I could not even adapt my lenses. However, it remains an excellent machine, able to give shots worthy of the middleform. Rating 9.8

avatarsenior
sent on October 13, 2020

Pros: Everyone, when you look at the files

Cons: Nobody when you look at the files.

Opinion: Not for everyone. There's no point in lying about it with its limitations. They're archnotes. It must be a conscious choice and not a "so much for .....". It's a tintaa machine. The focus isn't so horrible, just take a little hand. You can do pretty much anything. Just take our hand. Nothing to say about the battery. It runs out before you finish a glass of water. But just have a couple (better three). Even the viewfinder is not the best especially if you choose BN mode. Excellent construction. My comparison 6d looks like a toy.

avatarsenior
sent on September 30, 2020

Pros: See Sigma sd four h

Cons: . See sigma sd four h

Opinion: See Sigma sd four h (unfortunately I was wrong and I wrote the review of sd four h in the section of sd four). This is not so bad because apart from the resolution the two cameras are identical. I chose the H for the least crop factor that gave me wide-angle side advantages and to be more comfortable with any crop. --?--------------------------------------------------

avatarsenior
sent on June 10, 2020

Pros: Handling, menu intuitiveness, iso 100 shooting quality

Cons: body size, af speed, data saving speed

Opinion: Over time I tried all tastes but in the end the m4/3 was the one that gave me the most satisfaction... at one point I was kidnapped by an online review and decided to look for one: in the end I took a SDquattro with the 30mm. What to say, in its particular form, it is very attractive! Really high handling and feeling of very high solidity. The menu flows quickly, few and essential items... some customization and you are immediately ready to shoot. Strictly at iso 100 the Foveon sensor give its best; however, it requires a more accurate study of the composition in order to make good use of the light. Everything travels slower, the af is slow but very precise... saving the photo also takes a few more moments but, it is a compromise that must be accepted. For now I've only taken a few test shots and so I reserve the right to update the review also because the beauty comes when you print! I update: I resold it only because I did not digest its operational slowness but, its detail is really unreciable. Too bad, however, also for the availability of lenses ... I kind of regret it but I do not recommend it to those who are always running and are not made to wait ... I am now consoling with the GR3.

avatarjunior
sent on December 22, 2019

Pros: Colors and image cleanup

Cons: Slow focus, insufficient crosshair resolution

Opinion: I bought a Sigma SD Quattro because it allows instant replication of the optical image and observation of this replica with an eye isolated from the environment (1) and I bought it because it is equipped with a Foveon sensor, which offers the possibility of a recording high-quality electronics thanks to its unique design (2). I've been working with the device since it was launched in 2017 and I have to say that the mirror replica doesn't have enough resolution to focus the lens with the naked eye. Focus is only possible by activating autofocus that works well but very slowly. Momentary capture of the image is therefore difficult. As for the second reason why I purchased the Sigma SD Quattro, I can say that the sensor is really outstanding. When working at 100 ISOs, the sensor is able to take better advantage of the quality of the lens, especially in terms of detailed resolution. When set to a higher sensitivity, the recording quality of the Foveon Quattro sensor is similar to that of Bayer's sensors, which easily exceed its foveon rival with sensitivity above 400 ISOs. The Sigma SD Quattro was designed and built as a cul-de-sac. It only allows the use of Sigma SA lenses originally designed for the sigma SD1 Merrill corporate DSLR (2012). For Sigma SD1 Merrill, many high-quality corporate optics with an SA-specific bayonet graft have been left, but there will be no new ones. The SA attack has been abandoned and the imminent successor of the Sigma SD Quattro with the size of the FF sensor will already be equipped with a Leica attack.

avatarsenior
sent on October 07, 2019

Pros: Crazy image quality, pleasant to handle thanks to the body entirely in magnesium and its robustness, excellent display, dust filter that avoids dirtying the sensor with dust or other

Cons: it's not for all kinds of photography although not entirely to rule out the attempt

Opinion: Just taken past by canon 7d and fuji xt1, the quality jump is already felt just seeing it. Ok! it's very slow but as soon as you take a shot the monstrous quality that comes out of you pays off all the time waiting for it. you don't need to say much, in my opinion, (personally speaking) there is no apsc comparable to quality/price. super recommended for those who like to take pictures without hurry!! Ps. I edit the post after a year of use, what I'm doing with this mirrorless is absolutely crazy, carried everywhere and still looks new, I repeat how crazy the construction of this room is!! to this day I've paired it with a 50 f1.8 old and a sigma 100-300 f4, lens not at all suitable for the camera but that gave crazy shots, I have to say that coupled to the 100-300 f4 exceeds 2kg and becomes challenging, and with focus peaking you can focus even where the camera fails, because there is to say that if you do not use the art lenses is not guaranteed the correct operation even if so far I have been able to turn the focus only once. I confirm the amazingness of this camera that now is also affordable for everyone.

avatarjunior
sent on September 17, 2019

Pros: well-built machine body,100 iso image quality,shoot raw,jpeg and dng,big buttons,simple menu,great display

Cons: absolute slowness in writing,slow autofocus,bad yield over 200 iso,green flare in backlight,af continuous non-existent,annoying delay in refresh of the viewfinder,battery life,software for development raw very slow,buttons too soft and ghiere too Hard

Opinion: a machine to be used only for static subjects, with low iso and cavalletto.la image quality in controlled situations is fabulous,I had 3 digital medium-formed machines with 36x48 sensor, the results are comparable to these, as long as using serious targets art, with older ones is not guaranteed the proper functioning of the autofocus.beautiful colors, and white balancing in automatic very fedele.il body machine is solid,although the design very questionable. very defined and bright rear display, alongside which there is a smaller display indicating the settings of the machine.imenu is very simple and easy to imparare.la battery life is scarsa.il the viewfinder is large with well-read characters, although although slow in refresh, also between takes it turns all black and an hourglass appears.

avatarsenior
sent on September 13, 2019

Pros: File, Raw directly in BN, robustness, intuitive use, not exaggerated price....

Cons: Slowness, improbable AF, weight and clutter, zero functionalwill additional, heavy and bulky optics, difficult availability for both the used and the new... raw files managed only by the owner SW, which is not that great.... Indeed.

Opinion: I am a user of M43, and eager for novelty I decided to try qs Machine that so new is not... At first I was scared, it seemed huge (compared to my M43) and very heavy, then the heaviness fell back to normal, but the stain is very cumbersome considering then that I used it with a 30mm... The menu is very simple and intuitive, in 20 minutes (without reading any manual) you master the medium perfectly, all this intuitiveness at the end you pay in extreme poverty at the level of settings and customizations... but the real sore notes I found in the AF and in the general slowness of the machine, really impossible even for a machine of 2016! The AF is bad, the facial recognition is unusable and the AF points are only 9, all this made me return to the good and old recomposition to be able to get something decent.... all this combined with the fact that it is a machine practically nowhere to be found, both on the new and on the used... last sore note the management of raw files(3xf) that are read only by the Sigma Software, which for a years-old Lightroom is truly impossible... probably with a frequent use everything improves, but at first impact you are baffled.... But all this is mitigated when you go home and open the files on your computer, show.... The files are beautiful, especially the RAW directly in BN: fabulous! To get the same results with FF and M43 I have to make minimal one step in Lr and one with SilverEfex, here download the File and it is already ready... Finished! Beautiful... even in colors are very beautiful and the Wb is really great... all this as long as you do not exceed 800iso (at least with color)! In conclusion, in my opinion it is a machine that requires several compromises, if one is willing to accept them all, the results will not disappoint him, otherwise better to move on! It's a shame, however, that qs sensor is not developed properly, in my opinion with a couple of extra stops of iso sensitivity and a machine body adapted to the current ML, could really be the ultimate camera.... I dream of seeing a Simil-Foveon as the next M43 sensor... Meanwhile we wait for the next Foveon FF even if for costs and clutter will not be available to everyone... greetings Stephen!

avatarjunior
sent on December 22, 2018

Pros: Remarkable image quality for microcontrast and tonal steps. Clear and essential menu. Mastery of the car after a couple of hours. Double display. Robustness. General approach to photography (induced)

Cons: Sigma SA attack that limits the chances of finding used. It lacks many specific (objective) features. Slow autofocus (only nine points). The size to be mirrorless.

Opinion: After using with pleasure Sigma DP2 and DP0 Quattro, I opted directly for the mirrorless. The system was therefore no surprise. Autofocus objectively slow, but using the manual focus and the hyperfocal you can dare to make street without too much trouble. I bought the machine in kit with the 30 mm f1.4, which is very compact, however the pairing is generous in size and of considerable weight, I dare not imagine it in paired other optics Art series. It is a pity that the availability in the markets of lenses with SA attack close to zero makes it imperative to purchase new lenses and limits very (very) the possibility of trying goals and focals by exchanging them with friends or enthusiasts. Having said that, the feeling that gave me immediately was great, the pleasantness of shooting just as good. I am a user who really uses four functions on the cross of a camera so the essentiality of sd four for me was not a problem. The quality of the shots is really remarkable, the best I have encountered in recent years (with friends I had the opportunity to compare files between Canon 6d Sony a7ii and nikon 7200), although the approach is objectively different: ISO 100, and when the light goes down or or better to store the car in the bag. Great room for landscapes, study and architecture. For professionals it can hardly represent the only machine body, except in exceptional cases.

avatarjunior
sent on September 20, 2018

Pros: Unique camera, fabulous rendition sensor, extremely rugged, tropicalized, quiet, pure photography, NL outstanding

Cons: Heavy and cumbersome to be an ML, slow AF, battery, buffer, niche tool, best not to go over ISO 1600

Opinion: Absolutely unique camera, at the constructive level it is a real tank, the body is entirely in magnesium and transmits a remarkable sensation of solidity. Personally I consider it one of the best built and assembled photographic devices I have had in hand. Once noted what the SD four can not do, that is, all those genres that require speed and timing, forgetting AF Lightning with thousands of points, leaving the GUIs 15fps, not caring of ultradefinite videos and back to photography Once reasoned, the SD gives moments of pure photographic pleasure. The Foveon sensor, thanks to its three-layer RGB structure, returns images of a sharpness and dynamic range in absolutely unique colours. The exposure meter is not mistaken for a shot and the AWB function to light priority always manages to return the same color temperature present at the time of shooting. The JPEG files are great but it is advisable to shoot in RAW and work with the proprietary software free downloadable from the Sigma site. Rather basic and slow software but really able to work at best the files150 MB that churn out the sensor. It must be said that if the image was taken carefully the files do not require much post-production. The ISO seal is not much, the noise is already visible at 400 and becomes heavy at 1600, it must be said that it is a grain all in all pleasant, reminiscent of the film. In short, a machine that is not suitable for everyone, who knows no way, or loves it or hates it. The SD pushes the photographer to observe, to reflect and to shoot only if you are sure to bring home the right shot. For me it was a breakthrough, it made me realize that photography is not just tip and snaps as if there was a tomorrow... made me understand what is photographic art.

avatarjunior
sent on July 25, 2018

Pros: Cleaning the image at ISO Low, layout of the keys, beautiful to behold, tropicalized, extremely resistant, excellent grip

Cons: Pretty poor viewfinder, battery life, operating speed, write speed on SD, given its shape is quite cumbersome

Opinion: The first thing to say is: You can only do a few things, it is not a machine suitable for all styles of photography... Let's start with the body: it is very strong, personally I consider it extremely beautiful. The controls are few, but they are the ones that serve, in the right place, extremely essential, but you will not often go on the menu; it is very good, thanks to an extremely deep grip. The files are also too sharp, paradoxically... Full of details, almost infinite dynamic range, JPEG files already excellent in the car, ability to shoot in dng, also has the ability to shoot in SFD mode, the equivalent of an HDR that produces files of even 400mg, flat when they come out of Machine, but that can be postproduced in an exceptional manner. The viewfinder, however, is a sore part: not huge, has a slight lag and, accustomed to viewfinders like that of Fuji XT1, there is no history (it is usable and absolutely functional). Another sore point are the batteries, which arrive at 200 shots to put it big, and cost, unless you take 3e parts. Continuing with the negative points we arrive at speed: horrible. For writing on board you have to give yourself a book to read, and also the operating speed itself is disarming; It should be taken as if it were an old medium format.. If used for landscapes, on easel, from the best of itself... It can be used generally for everything, but it does not do well in situations of fast moving subjects, or where there is no light: over the 100 ISO, in my opinion, should not be used.. Already at 400 ISO you start to ruin the image. By pulling the sums, if used in the presence of good light, basic ISO, or tripod, is sensational, fantastic, has a body in my opinion perfect, and produces absolutely incredible files, at a price all in all content. In my opinion magnificent.

avatarjunior
sent on October 18, 2017

Pros: Colors, detail, black and white, tropicalized body with a very good ergonomics

Cons: Slow, not fit for everything

Opinion: The SD four is a very high quality car. It only pays to be very special. It is not an instrument that is not suitable for all kinds of photography. It is unbeatable when we talk about color and black and white detail in the sense that it returns a similar response to film, color, but also black and white. used with film philosophy, or a few clicks and reasoning, will become a machine you can not give up, especially for sensor yield. Another point in favor is the ability to shoot in DNG. However, do not expect a commercial mirror type like fuji or sony, the SD 4 is very slow, both as AF and as a save time on the file, and it also suffers big elevations more than a normal car. From my point of view, with the SD four I do unique things that I could not do with any other digital ... but for other things I still need the old and good reflex FF.rnThe use combined with the sigmat 18-35 1.8, a gorgeous lens that allows me to travel with body and optics without giving up a good range of focals and brightness 1.8.

avatarjunior
sent on October 18, 2017

Pros: Colors, detail, black and white, tropicalized body with a very good ergonomics

Cons: Slow, not fit for everything

Opinion: The SD four is a very high quality car. It only pays to be very special. It is not an instrument that is not suitable for all kinds of photography. It is unbeatable when we talk about color and black and white detail in the sense that it returns a similar response to film, color, but also black and white. used with film philosophy, or a few clicks and reasoning, will become a machine you can not give up, especially for sensor yield. Another point in favor is the ability to shoot in DNG. However, do not expect a commercial mirror type like fuji or sony, the SD 4 is very slow, both as AF and as a save time on the file, and it also suffers big elevations more than a normal car. From my point of view, with the SD four I do unique things that I could not do with any other digital ... but for other things I still need the old and good reflex FF.rnThe use combined with the sigmat 18-35 1.8, a gorgeous lens that allows me to travel with body and optics without giving up a good range of focals and brightness 1.8.

avatarsenior
sent on September 01, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, chromium, dynamic range, high zoom focus, crazy black and white, extreme quality images.

Cons: Lack of sensor stabilization, few focus points, annoying noise already over iso200. My sensor gets dirty easily, but I think I'm the only one ... the usual ass

Opinion: I come from Nikon D810, Olympus om d em1 and Sony a7rii, so I have the eye trained to claim and lover of the macros I try very much the detail pushed and the cleaning of the pictures. The foveon has fascinated me so much to give away the nikon d810. Designed to excel with the optics of the new Sigma Park, the Art are amazing, I hit the file quality and the detail it returns ... feeling I NEVER had with the D810. That was enough to accept the challenge. Now i have sigma four sd and optical sigma grafts that I use seamlessly on sony a7rii cn mc11 adapter. Sure ... wants good lenses, it has an equivalent of 39megapixel..ha in the thirst of light its achilles heel for more than 200 iso I refuse to use it ... but to iso 100 with a good fit .. my mouth open .. and pay the limits it has ... so much to understand..what you do weddings well in church go to ff like d810 and sony, in short, bodies that allow bumps of photos, af immediate and cleaning also to iso 4000 ... but x the pictures to the newlyweds who are thought and stuck outdoors ... here is a lived experience ... you will really have a march in more cn the sigma four sd ....and black and white ... sublime ... do a 9 because if this sensor was inside the body and electronics of the sony a7rii ... it would be a vote 20 ... not 10

avatarjunior
sent on August 18, 2017

Pros: Incredible image quality, cost, tropicalized, white balance, gorgeous black and white.

Cons: It can only be used in perfect lighting, heavy, optics and hard-to-find equipment, very slow proprietary RAW retouching software, heavy DNG files (32 gb of memory are approximately 290 clicks), battery life does not excellent.

Opinion: It is a real "film machine" in digital version. Unusable already at 400 ISO. At 100 Iso both the Raw and the Dng and the Jpeg are fabulous, never taken such defined photos that need a minimum (but really a minimum) of post-production. Used to a rather pushed use of Lightroom, I find myself genuinely in trouble (in a positive sense). If you love "slow and reasoned" photography this SD Quattro will love you! Not being comparable to any other mirrorless my rating is absolutely 9.

avatarjunior
sent on July 20, 2017

Pros: jpg

Cons: Viewfinder

Opinion: Just bought it and immediately resold it to Mirino that at long distances flicker to watch and do not see na poker, to render bad with normal targets such as the zombies that on the previous Foveon all goes great, for sideways waiting times for the development of A X3F with amateur PCs, for that thin electronic buzz that is already visible at 100 iso and for that tubule that protrudes into the manifold. That's why I'm repackaged because I need a Foveon that works in color and this is the Best of all, for Run with the various formats 1: 1 6: 7 which makes it so medium format but above all to disable RAW and shoot only in JPG (the best at 100 iso in circulation) which is a luxury that has never been seen before In SIGMA home. The hot car takes fire, eye to temperature, contrast light & quality fixes

avatarjunior
sent on June 25, 2017

Pros: Constructive quality, very high image quality, some really smart solutions that allow you to have quick access to features without having to go through the menus

Cons: For my way of shooting I do not find real limitations is a machine to slowly and therefore unsuitable for photos of pure action even if with small technical details this is not impossible, generous battery

Opinion: The aesthetic appearance may or may not like it, in fact it has a somewhat odd shape, but the machine is really well constructed, looks cured and gives a feeling of solidity. The ring bars and buttons are very well distributed and are comfortable to reach and To be mentally stored as it is reduced to the need. Some performances are as clever as the split monitor, the big picture appears while the smallest is the equivalent of the one placed on top of the reflex with the shutter parameters at each side Voice is a button that lets you access the voice and change the data value (ISO, exposure compensation, exposure method, shutter mode, timing, diaphragms), very convenient is also a button that allows you to access a menu Fast customizable with the most used items. The two ring guides are also customizable for diaphragms and exposure compensation. RnThe use is aIntuitive fun and if you have experience with other cameras there are no problems or complications just a quick reading of the manual. The camera is very peculiar, and forces it to a reasoned use keeping in mind some technical details that were used in analog photography and that You are a little lost with the digital camera. This is why in order to fully exploit the qualities of a sensor that I find extraordinary, I was a bit skeptical, I also own a 5d mark III canon, but I assure you that the difference is there. RnI do not speak of The quality of the picture itself per se, the canon gives wonderful images, but I'm talking about a different reality feeling: the perfect details and the amount of color tones that make realistic almost palpable images look like. Rn you could call a " Three-dimensionality "given by the shades of colors and detail. What is reflected in positive manners even in black and white images that have A wealth of enormous tones. All this contributesEven a perfect white balance. The camera also has defects that have a major impact on those looking for a medium for action photography: limited usable usability, slow self-focus, long write times on the fast-running battery card.rnSecond My experience is a camera that can give enormous satisfaction to those who want a reasoned and slow photography and looking for an excellent quality, especially at the printing stage which in my opinion emphasizes even more the quality of the image that the machine can return. I would say that the machine was designed to get to the last step, that is to print the photo. RnIn conclusion it is a camera that does not do everything but what does it do so excellently.rnrnrn

avatarjunior
sent on April 18, 2017

Pros: Image quality that returns unmatched, and for the range of colors for the definition. Recovery of the shadows and very good lighting. File .jpg more than adequate (apart from the dynamic range)

Cons: It is not a machine for all kinds of pictures, certainly not for sports pictures in low light situations or photographic hunting. slow writing on the board and use as they used analog cameras. Grana already seen 400 asa although pleasant. It takes a long time to process the owner's raw form. It grows only with its original software (free). The JPG, which creates room is very good as the definition and color, but it is not comparable with the dynamic range you can get developing the raw. Battery that does not reach a hundred shots.

Opinion: I also have other far more expensive machines, but when I try a quality that reminds the colors of old slides and a definition where you read the details even more purposes in the distance, I'll take some time and go out with you ;-) optical rnCon Sigma relatively modest price comparison with Canon 5D m2 and 24 -105 f4 L is embarrassing (for Sigma). Of course look good on a monitor 100%

avatarsenior
sent on February 10, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, Body, Quality material, sensor unbeatable 100iso, jpeg files, Cost, and monitor settings as keys etc.

Cons: No one except for high iso

Opinion: I had this machine in a too hectic period in my life, but I could appreciate all its advantages as "digital film" rninfatti is where we must focus piu..questa machine does not forgive mistakes, and needs a certain light. rnSe must have the balls before Techniques able to exploit her gorgeous sensore.In study his honors but also perhaps with external lights contrastate.rnIo recommend it only for those who are passionate but bored by the new cameras without carattere.rnSe me is another update again review;)

avatarjunior
sent on September 05, 2016

Pros: Quality files; viewfinder; handling and balanced, the menu features.

Cons: per hour for the use that I do none

Opinion: It is a particular machine, however, as the sensor that mounts. or like or piace.rnrispetto the sd1 merrill has since its an electronic viewfinder that offers a far more generous view of the scene and a higher magnification and a very useful 8x zoom function for the MP that allows you to make fine adjustments of the focus. rnper regarding the AF much better than the sd1. not fast but at least much more preciso.rnpiù faster than in the processing of the file is sd1m although much slower than the SLR and mirrorless canon and sony (nikon not know) rnqualità files as they exit the machine eccelsa.rnper me beautiful function of previsualizzaizone and previsualization in bn (mainly because I use it for that, at least for now) before scatto.rnforse, after learning to appreciate the directional screen of the sony a7 in some particular circumstances (also loving aiming crosshair) maybe It lacks the ability to have one or swivel screen, although this would make it clearly more fragile.rnsolid structure and very particolare.rnsi line very quickly learns to use it, of course if he first has already entered the world sigma.rnil SPP program does what it has to do and allows you to develop the battery life rawrnLa file does not seem to effectively be so bad as sd1m but it certainly is not as effective as any SLR canon.







 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me